PREDICTION VALIDATED: Trump Poll Numbers May Be Vastly Inflated Due to Name Recognition

Director Blue ^ | February 7, 2016 | Malcolm X. Cromwell

[ifinnegan]

TV is reality.

I’d like to see a poll that compared TV watching with support for a candidate.

[FreedomForce]

Likely so. 10% of college graduates think Judge Judy is on the Supreme Court.

[Read Write Repeat]

If this is all about name recognition, Jeb would be polling in the top three.

[Byron_the_Aussie]

.. the term "low-information voter" may be too harsh, but I suspect that many Trump supporters ..

Isn't it great that we don't have to into the fever swamps anymore, to find out what the libs are thinking?

You can get it brought to you, here on FR.

[Lib-Lickers 2]

Tuesday night is just a few hours away..

[2ndDivisionVet]

I heard a lot of that back on February 1st.

[LowOiL]

"The Trump Effect"

Higher negative numbers than Hillary?

[UnwashedPeasant]

"Trump Poll Numbers May Be Vastly Inflated Due to Name Recognition"

We might have the answer in less than 2 days.

Trump has to win NH. If he can't win a Liberal state like NH, he is done.

[Lib-Lickers 2]

then you predict the outcome I’d love to hear it .. you seem like you are trying to say something by posting all that crap.. say it already

[spokeshave]

Grasping at straws redux

[2ndDivisionVet]

Trump 1st, Cruz strong 2nd, Rubio 3rd, Kasich 4th.

[spokeshave]

I think tat the title is wrong...

Should be:

Prediction Postulated

[Windflier]

I don’t think I’ve ever seen so much denial of concrete reality on the part of any Freeper. I can only hope you come out of this with your head on straight, and a clear eye toward the future.

You’re about to land hard. Real hard.

[Helicondelta]

Nonsense. The RCP average had Trump and Cruz in a statistical tie before the Iowa caucus.

The polls were accurate.

The late deciders broke for Cruz and Rubio because Trump did not attend the debate.

[Windflier]

...you seem like you are trying to say something by posting all that crap.. say it already

Not his style. He only posts cryptic half replies and hundreds of articles that bolster his personal point of view.

[SubMareener]

So if Ted Cruz doesn’t come in a strong second you will consider that a loss?

[2ndDivisionVet]

That’s what I was told prior to February 1st.

[PghBaldy]

This may be true, but there has only be one vote so far, and Cruz, who has been campaigning in Iowa since early 2013 (a few months after he was Senator), won. One would think Cruz would have done better in Iowa.

[Lib-Lickers 2]

Cruz a strong second?.. just wondering does that mean strong close to Trump’s numbers(like within 5 points) or strong compared to Rubio’s numbers?.. be fun if you put up a prediction thread requiring the order of the first 4 or 5..

I’ll go Trump, Kasich, Cruz, Rubio, Bush, Christie..