Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Check out this rundown of all the ways the media is colluding with Hillary Clinton’s campaign
Canada Free Press ^ | 10/12/16 | Robert Laurie

Posted on 10/12/2016 11:31:44 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony

"The media is an extension of the Democratic Party"

If you’ve been staying on top of the ever-increasing severity of the Podesta email leak, you’re probably aware that the media has been deep in cahoots with the Clinton campaign. I know, I know, you were already aware of that. But now, “they” can’t argue when you make the claim, because Podesta’s messages contain incontrovertible evidence.

Today, on Stuart Varney’s Fox Business show, they ran through the list of salient leaks. ...Or, At least the ones that had been revealed prior to airing. After they read each one, Varney appeared to be flabbergasted.


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: collusion; democraticparty; hillaryclinton; media

1 posted on 10/12/2016 11:31:44 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

O’Reilly promised to do a full rundown on his show tonight....


2 posted on 10/12/2016 11:52:12 AM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

From the FCC’s web site:
What responsibilities do broadcasters have?

As public trustees, broadcasters may not intentionally distort the news. The FCC has stated publicly that “rigging or slanting the news is a most heinous act against the public interest.” The FCC may act to protect the public interest when it has received documented evidence, such as testimony from persons who have direct personal knowledge of an intentional falsification of the news. Without such documented evidence, the FCC generally cannot intervene.
What if I have comments or concerns about a specific news broadcast or commentary?

All concerns or comments about a specific news broadcast or commentary should be directed to the local station and network involved, so that the people responsible for making the programming decisions can become better informed about audience opinion.
Filing a complaint

You have multiple options for filing a complaint with the FCC:

File a Complaint Online
By phone: 1-888-CALL-FCC (1-888-225-5322); TTY: 1-888-TELL-FCC (1-888-835-5322); ASL Videophone: 1-844-432-2275
By mail (please include your name, address, contact information and as much detail about your complaint as possible):

Federal Communications Commission
Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau
Consumer Inquiries and Complaints Division
445 12th Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20554
What to include in your complaint

Complaints alleging news distortion, rigging or slanting must contain documented evidence must include documented evidence showing deliberate misrepresentation. Your complaint, at a minimum, should indicate:

name and phone number of the company that you are complaining about and location if the company is a cable or satellite operator
station call sign, radio station frequency or TV channel, and station location
network, program name and date and time of program if you are complaining about a particular program
any additional details of your complaint, including time, date and nature of the conduct or activity you are complaining about and identifying information for any companies, organizations or individuals involved
documented evidence showing deliberate misrepresentation

Accessible formats

To request this article in an accessible format - braille, large print, Word or text document or audio - write or call us at the address or phone number above, or send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov.
Download a printable version of this guide

journalism.pdf Opens a New Window. (50 KB)

Search the Help Center
Related articles

Obscene, Indecent and Profane Broadcasts
Filing a Complaint Questions and Answers
How the FCC Handles Your Complaint
Receiving Television Broadcast Stations From Satellite TV Companies
C


3 posted on 10/12/2016 12:11:13 PM PDT by notaliberal (St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

To them, it’s worth cheating. If they succeed, they know they’ll never have to do it again!


4 posted on 10/12/2016 12:20:03 PM PDT by Dr. Pritchett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: notaliberal

Another fruitful possibility is campaign finance law.

Corporations are allowed to make independent contributions under Citizens United. But they are not allowed to coordinate efforts with individual candidate campaigns.

It seems we have ample evidence of the coordination of political campaigns with media corporation in kind contributions.


5 posted on 10/12/2016 1:32:16 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Bookmark.


6 posted on 10/12/2016 2:18:55 PM PDT by SunTzuWu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Memo to Fox News:

bias

noun
a particular tendency, trend, inclination, feeling, or opinion, especiallyone that is preconceived or unreasoned: illegal bias against older jobapplicants; the magazine’s bias toward art rather than photography;
our strong bias in favor of the idea.

collusion
noun
1.
a secret agreement, especially for fraudulent or treacherous purposes; conspiracy.

This is NOT BIAS. This IS COLLUSION!!!


7 posted on 10/12/2016 2:40:23 PM PDT by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton (Go Egypt on 0bama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson