Consumer Reports gave Planned Parenthood condoms the worst possible score for strength & durability

wordpress ^ | February 19, 2017 | Dan from Squirrel Hill

[Pearls Before Swine]

Why is “durability” a criterion for condom quality?

It has to be good for long sessions as well as "quickies."

This article reminds me of a crossword puzzle I was working on last night. It took me a long time that the answer to the clue "full of holes" was "porous."

[moovova]

“How many times do they think it is going too be re-used?”

Believe me, it’s difficult to get a rubber back on the tinfoil package.

[Yaelle]

WHY the hell would an abortion mill want condoms to WORK?

[trisham]

Exactly.

[Yaelle]

[wildbill]

{the following to be sung to the tune of My Bonnie lies over the Ocean}

Planned Parenthood sells cheap prophylactics.
They puncture each tip with a pin.
‘Cause PP gets rich from abortions
My God, how the money rolls in.

Rolls in, rolls in, My God how the money rolls in.

[metmom]

I’m so surprised.......

[mad_as_he$$]

I wonder if they are made in Mexico or China.

[Lizavetta]

More condoms that break, the more abortions. More abortions means more money. More money means...

.... more donations to Democratic politicians who vote on legislation that gives more funds to PP who make more donations to Democratic politicians who vote on legislation...

The endless slush fund.

[VaeVictis]

Well of course they are absolute junk. What better way to drive up abortion money if you sell a product that has a high ‘accident’ rate.

[servo1969]

Hey, they don't make their money preventing pregnancies; they make their money ending pregnancies.