Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can Trump Supporters Legally Shoot Left-Wing “Antifa” Attackers?
bearingarms.com ^ | March 6, 2017 | Bob Owens

Posted on 03/06/2017 8:55:01 AM PST by PROCON


According to The Blaze, a group of President Donald Trump’s supporters attempting a political march barely made it two blocks before they were violently attacked by left wing radical associated with the so-called “Antifa”or “anti-fascist” movement in Berkeley, California on Saturday.

A small riot erupted Saturday afternoon in Berkeley, California, after violent protesters confronted pro-Trump demonstrators and allegedly began a confrontation that turned violent.

The confrontation occurred on a day when Americans across the country held peaceful demonstrations in support of President Donald Trump, free speech and America.

According to the Los Angeles Times, the pro-Trump demonstrators participating in the “March 4 Trump” rally began marching at 2 p.m. PST Saturday at the Martin Luther King Jr. Civic Center Park. Just several blocks up the road, they were met by counter-protesters dressed in masks and black clothing who began the confrontation.

Photos and videos posted to Twitter and other social media showed fistfights, shouting matches, people being beat with sticks and signs, people pulling hair and some counter-protesters pepper-spraying the pro-Trump marchers, including an elderly man.

(Excerpt) Read more at bearingarms.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: banglist; deadlyforce; rioters
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
There are several short videos at the link of the rioting at Berkeley that the author based his opinion on.

Author's opinion:

Both sides acted childishly and violently, but there was no violence that came close to justifying the use if firearms to stop a deadly force attack. Put simply, the fights I saw weren’t nearly as bad as bar fights I’ve seen in real life.

These were mostly incidents of very brief mutual combat where no one was seriously hurt.

No, introducing firearms to such a scenario is not justified. It’s frankly stupid, as you’re much more likely to hit innocent bystanders downrange than you are likely to hit the person you’re shooting at in such dense crowds.

Comments?

1 posted on 03/06/2017 8:55:01 AM PST by PROCON
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PROCON; mylife; Joe Brower; MaxMax; Randy Larsen; waterhill; Envisioning; AZ .44 MAG; umgud; ...

RKBA Ping List

This list is for all things pertaining to the 2nd Amendment.

If you would like to be added to or deleted from this Ping List, please FReepmail me.

2 posted on 03/06/2017 8:55:37 AM PST by PROCON (Defending the Border isn't a Political Option, it's a Constitutional Obligation ~ Rick Perry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Happened already Seattle.


3 posted on 03/06/2017 8:56:06 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (The Washington Post is Jeff Bezos' Fake News unregulated SuperPAC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Put simply, the fights I saw weren’t nearly as bad as bar fights I’ve seen in real life.


Well, here in KY, all you need is to percieve that you are at risk of receiving great bodily harm.

I say pop ‘em when they come at you.

But then, like I said, I’m in KY. I doubt they’d try that stuff here.


4 posted on 03/06/2017 8:57:44 AM PST by Mr. Douglas (Best. Election. EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

One sucker punch will kill you.

Just sayin.


5 posted on 03/06/2017 8:57:45 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (The Washington Post is Jeff Bezos' Fake News unregulated SuperPAC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

If someone came at me with a stick I’d feel justified in pointing my gun at them and shooting if they kept coming


6 posted on 03/06/2017 8:57:59 AM PST by Chengdu54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

I imagine that in most large cities and on the left coast, they are totally protected against self defense by their victims.


7 posted on 03/06/2017 8:58:25 AM PST by yarddog (Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

My Opinion -

Legal, yes.

Backlash, yes.

Outcome, poor = arrested, jailed, tried, found guilty, loss of property, job, reputation, etc.

As I just typed the last sentence, I am reminded of the signers of The Declaration of Independence.

And I am convicted.


8 posted on 03/06/2017 9:02:33 AM PST by Scrambler Bob (Brought to you from Turtle Island, otherwise known as 'So-Called North America')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie
Happened already Seattle.

Was it ever determined which side he was on?

9 posted on 03/06/2017 9:03:23 AM PST by PROCON (Defending the Border isn't a Political Option, it's a Constitutional Obligation ~ Rick Perry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Collectivist revolution craves blood. It lubricates their engine. Opting for a bloody action against them is just what they want.

A better way: find out where they are getting their money and go after that. And sue the pants off of anyone who does harm to people or property.


10 posted on 03/06/2017 9:04:01 AM PST by lurk (TEat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
violently attacked by left wing radical associated with the so-called “Antifa”or “anti-fascist” movement in Berkeley, California

How about that. An anti-fascist movement that utilizes fascist tactics.

11 posted on 03/06/2017 9:06:23 AM PST by MAexile (Bats left, votes rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Why are “anti-Fascists” attacking Trump supporters?


12 posted on 03/06/2017 9:12:58 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
Can Trump Supporters Legally Shoot Left-Wing “Antifa” Attackers?

Of course, as long as the legal requirements are met: A Reasonable assessment... of Imminent... Danger... of Lethal Harm. If a reasonable person would acknowledge that the danger is imminent, and potentially lethal (basically any grievous injury, which includes rape), you're following the law. Now, as to whether a jury or Liberal Prosecutor will also follow the law is a different latter these days. A man carrying a gun is not meeting the criteria. A man pointing a gun (at anyone) is. Parading Leftist idiots is not. Four masked men with sticks beating an elderly man is. Got it?

13 posted on 03/06/2017 9:13:32 AM PST by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Ask them.


14 posted on 03/06/2017 9:16:16 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
Let's play the leftist game. Define "legal" these days. I can be "legally" declared dead at the hands of a mob of thugs or I can be alive from "illegally" using my 2A instrument to defend myself.

It isn't a complicated decision for me.

15 posted on 03/06/2017 9:16:31 AM PST by TADSLOS (Reset Underway!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Because they are hypocrites and the movement of peace and nonviolence is and was (from the 60s) a lie.

Until I hear their leadership condemn the violence, it is reasonable to assume that they support it.

16 posted on 03/06/2017 9:17:00 AM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Why are “anti-Fascists” attacking Trump supporters?

They don't know and don't care. They are weaponized feral youth, being told and taught that they are Good People for beating women and the elderly, while wearing masks, and that Virtue Signaling is all they want, need or crave... but they likely are being paid for their services as well. The fact that neither Trump nor anyone else advocates for Fascism is irrelevant. The fact that they use Fascist violence and terror tactics to enforce their ideology, while calling it anti-fa, is ironic, but the irony is lost on them.

17 posted on 03/06/2017 9:17:04 AM PST by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
Can Trump Supporters Legally Shoot Left-Wing “Antifa” Attackers?

Yes, ...

IF you have Constitutional Rule Of Law and honest cops, in the area in which you defend yourself.

18 posted on 03/06/2017 9:17:05 AM PST by Navy Patriot (America returns to the Rule of Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Because they are actually fascists, but can’t see the irony.


19 posted on 03/06/2017 9:17:39 AM PST by ConjunctionJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sport

Good idea.

I don’t suppose you have their home addresses....


20 posted on 03/06/2017 9:17:45 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson