History just keeps repeating itself.
In Rules for Radicals, Alinsky used his wisdom to provoke societal destruction, and along with it, the free government built upon a civil society.
There is a huge difference between Robspierre and Alinski. Robespierre was motivated for change that would bring Freedom to the individual. Alinsky is a utopian whose ideal society can only be brought about by destruction and the imposition of totalitarian systems of government: what he called “civil society.” Genuine patriotic Americans will have none of it.
This thread article is an attempt to legitimize Alinski. when in fact they are promoting liberal fascism and a diminution of freedom and civil society as we know in within the United States.
No, if you want to know about Alinski read this article:
Barrack Obama: The Quintessential Liberal Fascist
Alinski is no different than those who promoted fascism in Europe and around the world during the 1920s.And when these fascists attained political power in such places as Germany Japan and Italy, we had to shoot them all.
And we can do it again, if necessary.
" That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."
As long as society pursues the truth, it is capable of correcting misperceptions and mistakes. Freedom to pursue the truth doesnt exist under slavish regimes; it is a characteristic of a free society.
"Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free."
OUTSTANDING post/essay Jacquerie. Thanks. BUMP!
History/current events BUMP!