Robespierre's motivation was equality, not freedom.
There is a huge difference between Robspierre and Alinski. Robespierre was motivated for change that would bring Freedom to the individual.( Correct)
Robespierre’s motivation was equality, not freedom.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>( Wrong.)
Nope. You are wrong:Robspierre was motivated by FREEDOM!Without liberty the others could not exist.
The French Revolution began as a sign of hope as intellectuals rushed to see their enlightenment ideas put into action. The Declaration of the Rights of Man, the symbol of the revolution, radically declared rights for all men including that of freedom of speech and the right to vote. However as the Jacobins Club gained control the revolution took a dark turn where the guillotine and blood became the symbol of this radical revolution with Robespierre at its head in what would famously be known as the Reign of Terror.”
Equality of material benefit is a communist idea introduced by Marx et. al. much later. Bread riots do not equate with the reason for energy of a freedom movement. The equality of the French revolution was the equality of commoners to the nobility, not equality of materialism as touted by Alinsky Alinsky would enslave the people rather than free them , his civil society is utopian and draconian. Just look at what Obama had wrought following Alinsky, he almost ruined America and it will take years for us to dig our way out of Alinsky’s “civil society.”
As Patrick Henry said , true today as it was then: “ Give Me Freedom, Or GIVE ME DEATH!”
That will put Alinsky in his coffin, for good.
History cannot be rewritten no matter how hard one tries.
We may have to shoot every Alinsky liberal fascist radical in America, and if we have to, so be it.