I typed in Blasey. The computer changed it to Glassy.
BTTT
So YOU’RE the other conservative in Montgomery County!
I know she’s lying simply because of the circumstance, AND she’s a Democrat.
Her supporters don’t believe her, they find her useful. That’s all.
Correction, not form California but born, raised and educated in Maryland.
Her school yearbooks are very telling of her cultural mores: http://cultofthe1st.blogspot.com/2018/09/why-christine-blasey-fords-high-school_19.html
I still wonder at her scrubbed social media and the scheming done to attempt this assassination of Kavanaugh.
And Ed Whalen offered some serious reasonable doubt, pointing to Chris Garrett. Garrett has been completely, absolutely silent. No denial, nothing.
I almost wonder if the Republicans have some 11th hour surprises in store?
It is obvious she is lying. It is just that Chuck Assley has no balls to deal with it. The GOP-e always caves to Rat traps.
I hate the GOP-e. They are pond scum.
Unfortunately, this makes me wonder how reliable Kavanaugh will be once/if he is sworn in as a SCJ.
I am not easily fooled and I do not believe this pound me to movement is as decisive as the cowardly Republicans think it is.
“Mentally troubled” is kind.
The Republicans are playing into the democrats hands. They risk losing what Trump has been winning. They’re a losing team with a star player.
Well she passed a polygraph test. Most police officers will tell you that even right after an event witness statements are going to vary and the quality of memory will fade over time. There is no way to say whether she remembers what she thinks she does or if maybe she believes it was Kavanaugh because she wants to believe it was him.
The only evidence we have is that she isn’t intentionally lying, and that Kavanaugh himself has been a man of stellar character throughout his adult life. An honest person would give him the benefit of the doubt because this is a 36ish-year-old memory of a man that by her own admission, she never once had contact with after the alleged attack.
What if HER job as a professor were put in jeopardy because she willingly went to unsupervised coed drinking parties when she was 15?
WaPo alludes to conflict between BF and her parents. anything circulating on that? i see that her parents did NOT sign the family letter of support that was trotted out the other day. i wonder what they might have to say.
It is too bad that Republicans have bent over backwards to allow this woman to testify on an unsubstantiated version of her memory or dreams to caste aspersions against an honorable man, and she and her phony lawyers (supported by the rats) made unreasonable demands and she keeps asserting her victim-hood and does not appear to be willing to testify.
The democrats are evil and will do anything to get their way. I suspect they will lose big time in November (deservedly so). Their hatred for Trump will continue to spur a Made America Great Again victories!
I do not believe her story and she has too many details lacking and it is basically unfair for her to bring this up without sufficient details, evidence or corroboration. For her own sake, even if some of this did occur (not criminal), she needs to get over it for her own mental health. Why doesn’t she plead quilty to public drunkenness? Is she a basket case or just full of hatred for Trump? Why doesn’t she press for an investigation now in Montgomery County MD?
It appears to me like a high-tech lynching similar to Clarence Thomas!
Where are the 75 men who know his accuser? No one from her high school years has come forward to stand with her.
This article is really about the elephant in the room. Everyone knows this whole episode was concocted for political reasons. The media knows it, but treats it like it’s legit. Of course the Dems know it’s a fabrication. The strange thing is, the Republicans know it’s made up, and yet act overly concerned about it’s possible truth. And don’t seem to try to expose the scammers. The whole thing is like bad theater, and everyone knows it, but plays along.