Image stolen from LibWhacker
Posted on 09/24/2018 6:13:30 PM PDT by Libloather
**SNIP**
While most Democrats are taking Ramirez’s allegation seriously — if not to the extent they're publicly backed Ford — they’re stopping far short of giving the same treatment to a third, unknown woman tied to the nominee and represented by celebrity lawyer Michael Avenatti.
Avenatti has tweeted that his client is a “woman with credible information” concerning “the targeting of women with alcohol/drugs” by Kavanaugh and his longtime friend Mark Judge, whom Ford has identified as the third person in the room during her alleged assault. But Democratic senators are treading lightly on the claims from Avenatti, who also represents Trump antagonist Stormy Daniels and is weighing a presidential run.
"You know I never have no comment, but I have no comment about Michael Avenatti," Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) said.
“Until we have more information, there’s not much that anyone can do with that,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), like Sanders a member of Schumer’s leadership team and leading 2020 presidential contender, said of Avenatti’s client.
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
Creepy open lawyer acts just like Schumer.
Porn not open. Creepy Porn Lawyer acts just like Schumer or Feinstein.
If avanatti’s claims were to turn out to be true, it would make FBI background checks worthless. :)
Not fair! Democrats need to let everyone in!
Michael Avenatti ✔ @MichaelAvenatti Warning: My client re Kavanaugh has previously done work within the State Dept, U.S. Mint, & DOJ. She has been granted multiple security clearances in the past including Public Trust & Secret. The GOP and others better be very careful in trying to suggest that she is not credible 10:32 AM - Sep 24, 2018
:-)
Can’t wait.
He’s a man. Dems run scared from men. Even male dems.
I doubt if these liars believe the accusations. They are sold to the devil. They will knowingly lie and cheat. Scrutiny for all leaders should be equal. Do they all want any accusation by any psycoloco put in the papers and media?
I don’t tbink it’s right to use “stiff” when decribing the Creepy Porn Lawyer. I think this just triggered me....
Wrong place to make this claim. A Secret clearance only requires a national agency check - e.g. send the name around and see that no federal agency has anything negative on the individual. The standard is staying out of jail. It does not require a background investigation much less an intensive background investigation (SSBI).
Avenati needs to try out his BS somewhere else.
Exactly. Every family can see itself out on the street, jobless, homeless and penneyless under a believe the survivor standard. How many women want to risk that for themselves and their children. How many grandparents what to have to provide food and shelter to their grandchildren until the reach adulthood.
my secret was way more involved than that. I saw my file once. It had comments from my college counselor and Dean,my HS counselor. It had comments from employees and owners of several places I worked.
That is a BI, not a. NAC. Based on a BI you cant get a TS clearance.
Image stolen from LibWhacker
No worries; I stole it, too! :-)
Of course,he is a male
Gee, she doesnt sound very "tolerant and compassionate" about this poor woman (smirk).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.