Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: TBP

The Civil War is extremely complex.

None of us were witness to it. We have to study it.

What we learn is filtered through the memories of the participants and the themes of authors.

Good, bad, right, wrong or indifferent, Lee won when the odds were against him.

He was a very good Commander.


5 posted on 10/13/2018 7:10:14 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: blueunicorn6

Lee was an excellent general and he had many truly excellent generals on his staff.

Lee was brilliant at exploiting the weaknesses of his opponents. It just happens that the weaknesses of his opponents were their generals. Let’s face it, the generals he went up against; McClelland, Burnside, Hooker, and most of the rest were third rate. Primarily political promotes. It’s easy to come out on top when you’re a first rate general with first rate subordinates going against the third string.

Grant and Sherman were very good generals who knew their own shortcomings and they knew how to fight and when they failed they came back even more aggressively. Never give up.

They also knew that Lee was letting his fame influence his decisions. He proved that in spades with the decisions he made at Gettysburg. He came to believe he could not be beaten and convinced his troops of the same. Overconfidence is a fatal flaw in any commander.


6 posted on 10/13/2018 7:54:14 PM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: blueunicorn6

Lee was playing for the wrong team. If a thief were to break into your home or hack into your computer, would you admire his ingenuity in doing it?


17 posted on 10/14/2018 12:50:43 AM PDT by jmacusa (Made it Ma, top of the world!'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: blueunicorn6

“He was a very good Commander.”

What helped Lee to be a great commander was that he had as a subordinate perhaps the greatest tactical general the United States has ever produced: Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson. Lee lost Gettysburg because he fought that battle as if he still had Jackson, who had died just weeks before. Longstreet was no Jackson.


28 posted on 10/14/2018 4:22:31 AM PDT by ought-six (Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson