Posted on 11/17/2020 7:25:27 AM PST by SeekAndFind
I worry about ACB not wanting to look like she was put there to protect Trump. She seems solid but she’s in a very tough position to be in. The fate of the republic may be in her hands. That may sound melodramatic, but it could all hinge on her.
Why is practically every single one of these articles from Gateway Pundit?
I see this in the work place all the time. Boss comes out and says we have a problem and declares the head will roll. After that, those with most guilt start finding ways to be the ones who found the causes and solutions without being able to find the culprits.
***********
LOL. Yep, rewards for the guilty and punishment for the innocent.
As I said earlier, the people at the top get there because they know how to avoid blame. Its the one thing they are good at.
Yeah..and my guess is Kavanagh and Gorsuch could go either way...and Roberts will be the turn coat lib that he was born to be.
So flip a coin twice, for Gorsuch and Kavanaugh each...if its heads both times...we win!
It sounds melodramatic and it also sounds almost word for word like a post I put up some days ago :)
Please God don’t let her feel like she has to bow out because she was put in so close to the election.
If anything, she should help the guy who got her the job! :)
I wonder if the dems wanting to expand the SC matters at all subconsciously
And their first order in philly being ignored
Because the mainstream news is BURYING IT.
If you don’t like Gateway, just go to the straight to the links they provide. I have found them to be more accurate than not.
Or follow Sidney Powell, L Lin Wood, Jenna Ellis, Rudy Giuliani on Twitter or Parler. What is coming out is absolutely mind boggling in terms of the scope of this fraud.
Who decides if Scotus will even take the case? Roberts supposedly hates Trump so you can’t count on him. Right now the only justices I really trust are Alito and Thomas. Coney Barrett is a question mark at this point. Kavanugh and Gorsuch..who knows.
Let’s hope she proves to be a vigorous defender of the Constitution and the foundations of our republic.
The professional and personal pressures on her are going to be unreal.
The evidence is overwhelming, it is nationwide, mathematically proven, evisenced with documents and video presentations from the company itself, and they have many affidavits now from people working within Dominion. Also, the method for loosening signature validations wasn’t just a GA thing, it was in many of the swing states. Same with kicking out GOP observers in the same states.
The preponderance and quality of evidence will demand SCOTUS take this up and rule in our favor.
And Obamacare was both a tax (not a fee) and at the same time a fee (and not a tax) ... in the same SCOTUS decision. Many of them are untethered from principles and they find ways to get the result they want. There is zero question that Breyer, Kagan, Sotomayor will support Trump regardless of the merits of the evidence. I’d put money on that.
Just had to fix something:
There is zero question that Breyer, Kagan, Sotomayor and Roberts
If you don’t like Gateway, just go to the straight to the links they provide. I have found them to be more accurate than not.
Or follow Sidney Powell, L Lin Wood, Jenna Ellis, Rudy Giuliani on Twitter or Parler. What is coming out is absolutely mind boggling in terms of the scope of this fraud.
Agree.
GP does a great job of collecting/summarizing, imo, and always gives the direct links.
You mean Biden, right?
Agreed.
Things will only get from worse to MUCH worse if people’s hopes are left up in the air.
After what has gone on for past five years - judiciary corrupted, President Trump under constant attack, FBI spying and coverups, etc. - how can ANYONE expect the coup participants to do what is right?
As much as I pray for President Trump and ultimate victory, I grow increasingly concerned that 2016 was the last election we’ll ever have.
This “evidence” must never be shown SCOTUS.
That is not the correct “court”. It must be shown state legislatures.
The only thing SCOTUS must be allowed to rule on is whether or not state legislatures provided a slate of Electors in accordance with the Constitution.
Have the matter go further than that and the “evidence” will get rebuttals during oral arguments. Don’t allow that. Make the case strictly about the legislatures performing a Constitutional function.
No, I mean that there is zero chance they will support Trump. As in no way, now how, never gonna happen.
Or said another way, there is a 100% chance that they will support Biden, no question aboutit.
Yep, they are more of an aggregate news source in my opinion. With a lot of annoying ads lol
Gotcha, the wording was a little confusing and I agree.
I’m sure Trump’s lawyers know the right route to go.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.