Posted on 12/17/2020 8:42:31 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Diabolical efforts expended upon, and ostesibly from, those who seek the truth.
I might find this more believable if the person who heard this said the justices were in a conference call near one of the justice’s office. I really don’t believe people like Breyer, Sotomayer, and Kagan would sit in a room with the 6 other justices and discuss this during a pandemic.
Works for me.
“Here’s a believable reason”
John Wayne and Ronald Reagan wouldn’t agree. [Well, John Wayne certainly....].
l8r
Clickbait. There is no video of Justice Roberts or any other Justice in the video.
This post isn’t even 4chan worthy.
BTW, it probably did happen... but no one can prove it, so what's the point? And claiming there is a video when there is not is just... fake news.
Interesting analogy. John Wayne backed Gerald Ford over Reagan in 1976 and Reagan never forgave him.
The rumor echo chamber going on is annoying as F.
It’s a purposeful distraction from the real substance.
Good point. I’m thinking that most of them are owned by Chyna and are literally in fear for their lives. The CCP is not as civilized as we are, nor are they as competent. I suspect that another 4 years without funding from the American taxpayers, they will go under.
However, if they make us into Chyna, the whole world will collapse.
RE: Stop posting this crap.
BTW, it probably did happen...
_____________________
The two statements are mutually exclusive.
If it probably happened then it can’t be crap.
The article is crap. It’s got a misleading headline indicating there is video of Roberts going off on the other justices. There is no video, therefore > crap.
He needs to recuse himself.
So the argument against this being true seems to be that the justices have been working remotely for several months meeting virtually only. Someone on twatter posted a link to the press releases as proof of that, but the court does remain open for official business, but is closed to the public. Another poster stated that this was actually a live meeting held at the court because the justices did not trust that the feed for a virtual meeting was secure.
Is there any proof one way or another regarding the meeting format where this loud argument/debate took place where these things were supposedly said? Were all of the justices actually on site at the USSC in a conference room?
I think he is more afraid of the violence that will come against him from CCP than he is of violence in the streets.
It's beyond "misleading", it's a lie. "populist press" and a bunch of other brand spankin' new blogs are just a mirror image of far left blogs that spout lies.
Although i am not happy they didn’t take this case i almost feel like they may be right. Imagine if they had taken it. All future elections would then be turned over to the courts to decide. The SC doesn’t want that role and shouldn’t want that role.
With all the fraud we all know about, none of us are happy with this decision. Unfortunately I think we are screwed unless DJT decides to declare martial law and demands a new elections with in person voting with ID required. Highly unlikely.
The headline is fake.
RE: All future elections would then be turned over to the courts to decide.
The Texas case DOES NOT ASK the SCOTUS to decide who the winner is.
What Texas and the 21 other states that joined the lawsuit seeks is for the Supreme Court to mandate that the defendant states comply with the Constitution, and that means that electors are selected by the states’ legislatures.
Texas makes this point clear, stressing: “Plaintiff State does not ask this Court to decide who won the election; they only ask that the Court enjoin the clear violations of the Electors Clause of the Constitution.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.