REVEALED: ‘Simple Math’ Shows Biden Claims 13 MILLION More Votes Than There Were Eligible Voters Who Voted in 2020 Election

Gateway Pundit ^ | December 20, 2020 | Joe Hoft

[Wayne07]

Let me help you out with an example with nice easy round numbers to help you understand.

There are 1000 black voters in 2016, Trump got 8%, 80 votes. Clinton got 92% 920 votes.

It is now 2020, and Trump improves and gets 10% of the vote, but voter turnout is higher, so there are now 1100 black voters. Trump now gets 110 votes (an increase, yay!), but Biden gets 990 votes, also an increase (boo!).

Get it?

[SmokingJoe]

In other words, like I keep saying, President Trump got a higher percentage of black voters in 2020 than he got in 2016 and Dementia Joe got a smaller percentage of black voters than Hilary Clinton got in 2016.
Yet somehow, by some miracle, Dementia Joe managed to garner a black vote percentage in a few select fraud ridden, gangster ruled Dem cities, which is like an older of magnitude vastly out of all proportion than he got in every other part of the country.
Stolen ballots are not real votes.

[Wayne07]

So I take it you don’t understand the math? Trump did slightly better with black voters, but still got crushed. Biden won 85-90% of the black votes. Unfortunately, turnout was way up, so it didn’t help Trump.

[SmokingJoe]

Again , President Trump did better with blacks against Dementia Joe this year than he did against Hillary Clinton in 2016.
And 2, Slow Joe did worse with blacks this year than Hilary Clinton did against Trump in 2016.
And it wasn't by “slightly” either, given how much propaganda was unleashed against President Trump and how divided the country is.
Exit polls conducted by Edison Research show President Trump won at least 18 percent of black men this year, up from 13 percent in 2016, and 8 percent of black women, doubling his percentage from four years ago.
I wouldn't call that a “slight” increase at all.

[Wayne07]

You are getting lost in the percentages, you win by total votes, not percentages of sub groups.

And the same Edison Poll (do you believe polls now>?) shows Trump losing support in other larger groups:

Edison’s polls showed Trump winning seven in 10 white men in Georgia, down from an eight-in-10 advantage over Clinton in 2016. While Trump is winning six in 10 voters who are at least 65 years old in Georgia, that was down from seven in 10 four years ago.

According to the exit poll, Trump appears to have lost support in Pennsylvania, a state that could determine the election, among white men, college-educated voters and people younger than 44.

The poll found that 61% of white men backed Trump’s bid for re-election, down 3 points from 2016.

Forty percent of college graduates voted for Trump, down 5 points from four years ago, and 33% of voters between 18 and 44 backed Trump in the state, down 9 points from 2016.

[SmokingJoe]

There you go quoting fake total votes from PA, GA WI, MI mostly from Philly,Detroit,Atlanta, Milwaukee etc again.
Again votes from ballot fraud in the big Dem run cities don't count.
Now you are shifting from insisting that President Trump did not increase his share of the black vote (which I debunked repeatedly) to talking about the white vote?
There was massive voter fraud I certainly corrupt white Dem enclaves too.
Just looking at Nevada (mostly Vegas etc), alone, we had:

Over 42,000 voted more than once in Nevada.
Another over 15,000 voted from “addresses” which were vacant parking lots, abandoned factories or buildings etc.
At least 1500 dead people voted.
19,000 voted who don't live in Nevada
8,000 voted from non existent addresses
4,000 non citizens voted

Altogether, at least 130,000 unique instances of fraudulent ballots were cast in Nevada this year.
And there are not just estimates. These are actual figures. Its easy enough to work out who voted more than once for example.

And again, even after the massive ballot fraud, President Trump doubled his percentage vote with black women and increased his percentage vote with black men, which totally destroys every single argument you've been making, no matter how you wiggle and slither and keep shifting your position.
What more you got?
Bottom line: President Trump won and he won big.

[Wayne07]

Do you have reading comprehension problems?. I never said Trump didn't increase his "share". I'm simply trying to explain to you that Trump can increase his share of black votes, and at the same time Biden increase the number of black votes he received. They are not in contradiction because the pool of black voters increased. Therefore, citing share or percentage as proof of a win or proof of fraud is mathematically ignorant. Go review the last ten posts, and educate yourself.

Wait a sec, do you know what share means? Did you know it is synonym for percentage? If you are half a man, you'll either apologize for lying, or cite one place I ever said " Trump did not increase his share of the black vote ". Put up or shut up loser.

[SmokingJoe]

Look at this deranged Dem troll spewing out garbage again.
Are you the same guy who claimed that President Trump did not increase his share of the black vote?
And repeatedly insisting you were right until even after I had debunked that nonsense?< And wasn't that your original point in this thread?/p>

[SmokingJoe]

I never said Trump didn't increase his “share”.

Yes you did. Read up.

I'm simply trying to explain to you that Trump can increase his share of black votes, and at the same time Biden increase the number of black votes he received.

That's the beauty of percentages. If President Trump increases his share of the black vote from 2016 (and he did by doubling his share with the female black vote and increasing his share of the male black vote by nearly 50%), then it doesn't matter whether the black vote turn out is high or not, Trump's total black votes is higher than if he'd gotten the same percentage of black votes as he had in 2016 against Hilary Clinton.
A higher percentage means you get a higher total number of votes than you had before if the turnout is higher.

[Wayne07]

You’re borderline incoherent, so no surprise you still don’t understand the math. Sad. Nobody said Trump got a lower share, or that Trump got fewer votes. Pound that into your empty brain. Sad you couldn’t apologize for failing to acknowledge I never said Trump didn’t increase his share. Your Mom would be disappointed in how you turned out. Not only dumb, but poor mannered.

[SmokingJoe]

You're certifiably insane.
You first of all claim President Trump did not increase his share of the black vote (he did), then when that was debunked, you come up with the “but he only “slightly” increased his share of the black vote” (which was yet another lie. President Trump DOUBLED his share of the female black vote,and increased his share of the male black vote by nearly 50%). By no means can that be called a “slight increase” except in the fevered, crazed mind of a a far left fanatic and troll.
In reality, President Trump did better with minorities than and Republican candidate for president since Nixon in 1960.
This is why Republicans gained seats at every single level, county, state legislatures, the house etc, apart from the US Senate where the Dems have so far managed a miserly one seat gain, despite predictions by Five Thirty Eight, Cook Report etc of massive gains by the Dems in the US Senate.
About the only places where the Dementia Joe managed to “win” in the swing states were in the fraud ridden, gangster ruled outlaw cuties of Philly, Detroit, Atlanta, Milwaukee and a few others where massive fraud was carried out. That's about it.
You got clobbered, losing 27 out of 27 toss up seats in the House, plus some more “lean Dem” seats too.
Now why don't you be a good little boy and slither back to the DU swamp you crawled out of?

[SmokingJoe]

“In 2016, the overall voter turnout rate nationwide was 59.2% of the voting eligible population, according to Michael P. McDonald of the non-partisan United States Elections Project. But in 2020, the national turnout rate skyrocketed to 66.7%, while the U.S. population grew by less than 2.8%. Navarro points to sworn testimony from former NASA and MIT data analyst Russ Ramsland, showing that 46 of 47 precincts in Wayne County, Michigan “displayed greater than a 96% voter turnout [while] 25 of those precincts showed a 100% voter turnout.”

Similar apparent overvoting occurred in Milwaukee and other key Democrat strongholds.

“This was theft by a thousand cuts across six dimensions and six battleground states rather than any one single “silver bullet” election irregularity,” Navarro concludes.”