Lindell Announces Launch Date for New Social Media Platform FrankSpeech and New Documentary

No, I watched the video although it was torture. The x axis is age and the two curves are actual and registered voters. Framk fit a polynormial to the actual voter curve, then claims the fit is proof of the manipulation. Even if the machines manipulate votes, which is entirely possible, the curve fits is not proof of that.

You lost the plot here. Start with old fashioned ballot box stuffing. Back in 1948 LBJ was losing his Senate primary after the polls closed. (That when only the Dem primary mattered in the South.) Miraculously, a box of 202 undiscovered ballots was found in Ward 13 of Alice, TX, which was enough to give LBJ a 87 vote win. Not coincidentally, the last 202 people to vote did so at the last minute alphabetically. Furthermore, many of those people had died, or where otherwise not in town on Election Day.

Now most people would call that evidence of fraud. Dead people shouldn't be voting, and if they did, it shouldn't have happened alphabetically. We are smart enough to identify that kind of cheating now, so the cheaters have gotten much more sophisticated. They first create an army of phantom voters they can summon when needed. Then they only call on them by age in exact proportion to the U.S. Census report on population. That's how they blend in the fake ballots with the real ones. The problem is that when there is no meaningful statistical deviation from one county to the next in a state from the key, it becomes proof in itself of fraud. Nothing is that perfect. There should be statistical deviation, if Frank is right, there wasn't. So, if correct, that is proof just like LBJ's alphabetical voting of 202 dead or absent voters of election fraud.

Also, ask yourself, why do these multi-million dollar machines take longer to process the election returns than traditional hand counting? What else were they doing that took so much extra time?

But the main problem is Frank doesn't understand vote counting and voter recording. The counting machines don't know who the voters are, they just count anonymous ballots. So they can't do what he says. Furthermore the actual voter curve doesn't come from the counting machine, it comes from envelope sticker scanning. The anonymous ballot is removed from that envelope. That's a big reason why ignoring the signature in GA, PA and elsewhere allowed so many fraudulent votes.

You are in denial here. That isn't a river in Egypt. The voting machines aren't admitted to be able to connect to the Internet and be part of a carefully managed and manipulated tabulation process, but Frank's statistical evidence is that is what they do. Otherwise, the voters wouldn't find the same key from county to county. It makes no difference where it was done, but Frank's data shows it was done. Unless his data was wrong, it proves that the machines were networked to process the needed ballots from the army of phantom voters by age, and that required a centralized controller at the county and state levels, even if you don't want to believe that's what happened. What other explanation is there? That this was all just a coincidence like LBJ's alphabetical voters? It's all too perfect.

Discovery will be costly for the plaintiffs. Lindell would end up paying a lot of money to voting machine companies because Frank is so obviously wrong. I think that's part of the goal here. But the main reason there are so many bonehead theories about algorithms is to distract from the actual massive fraud.

Hey, he's already in court with them, so what does he have to lose now? This isn't about money for him. As they audit the actual ballots, you will see the results. Further proof of the algorithm will come when they audit the results in places that used the machines in states that Trump won. That will show that he won by greater numbers than what was reported. The more traditional fraud to which you refer occurred in states where the algorithm by itself was unable to beat Trump. That was plan B, but plan A was the algorithm.

One of the things they were doing was the weighting of votes.That is a feature offered in the Dominion system, it is in their manual. Also, in Dr. Shiva's video, he showed from the Diebold system ( which was later bought by Dominion )in the 2004 election in Alaska, data from the systems tabulation software that revealed the vote total is stored as a double floating point variable ( a fraction) and not as an integer. There is NO need to calculate vote totals as fractions rather than integers unless you are doing that to manipulate the total.

These machines have been used to cheat in elections for around 20 years now. People are only slowly realizing something is wrong, but even when they realize something is wrong, they jump to the wrong conclusions. These voting systems are very good at hiding the fraud. They need to go, and we need to audit the ballots everywhere they were used in 2020. I expect that a few more Dem Congresscritters will be discovered to have lost in 2020.

Simply put every jurisidiction large enough and the country as a whole has a sixth order fit where the wiggles in the actual voters curve match the wiggles in the registered voters curve. That's because adjacent age groups vote at the same percentage except for the gradual rise from a lower percentage of younger to a higher percentage of older voters voting. The larger the jurisdiction, the more likely that is true.

Then they only call on them by age in exact proportion to the U.S. Census report on population. That's how they blend in the fake ballots with the real ones.

First, there's no need to do that. Second, the machines don't have the information to do that. Third, the curve fit is not proof, it's the real outcome of voting. The ballots are anonymous and fed into counting machines. The recording of voters by name was done prior by scanning the sticker on the envelope. And your answer to that is:

why do these multi-million dollar machines take longer to process the election returns than traditional hand counting? What else were they doing that took so much extra time?

They use mechanical paper feeds. The fastest ones scan 800 ballots per minute. That's an eternity in computer time. The time spent scanning is not evidence of anything. And your other answer is:

The voting machines aren't admitted to be able to connect to the Internet and be part of a carefully managed and manipulated tabulation process, but Frank's statistical evidencee....

Now you don't simply have an algorithm bias allegation. It would be easy enough to multiply Biden votes from the anonymous balots by 1.X or whatever makes sense given the prior numbers that the counting machine has in its database having been used for counting all day.

But instead you and Dr. Frank are proposing that the counting machines internet connections are used to connect to the voter databases, access the data and use that data to bias the vote according the "mathematically proof" of a curve fit.

Most ludicrous of all, you are proposing that the counting machines use their internet connection to update the actual voter tallies unbeknown to the people that maintain those databases, the people who scan in the voters from the envelopes or enter each in-person voter before they vote. That the counting machine is secretly updating the database of who votes even though it can't. And yet nobody notices that, except Dr Frank.

Dr. Shiva is slightly less wrong than Dr. Frank, but only slightly. He at least knows that voting counting machines do not have access to the voter registry and certainly do not update that registry. That fact appears to be beyond Dr Frank's comprehension.

But Dr. Shiva's fatal methodological flaw was to not perform the same analysis of straight party D versus Biden voters. Those results show the same downward slope. His wrong assumption is very simple: he believes that alll voters in any jurisdiction should vote the same percentage for Trump whether they vote straight party or not. But it is obvious with just a little thought that people who decline to vote straight party are going to be less likely to vote for Trump which is what the curve shows. The higher the percentage of straight party in a given district or precinct or county, the more likelly that the remaining voters are not Trump voters.

And the same is true for straight party D and Biden votes. In the counties with the highest straight party D votes (e.g. Wayne), the remaining voters will more likely be Trump voters. For example Dearborn MI went 30,718 Biden (70%) to 13,239 Trump. Straight party D voters were 20,766 (74%) to 6,780. Split tickets were therefore 9,952 to 6,459 or 61% Biden.

What is most amazing about Dr Frank and Dr Shiva is neither of them has the least bit awareness of the other. If they had something they could pin on Dominion they would collaborate, but they don't. Instead they contradict each other.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.