Posted on 02/26/2022 2:15:32 PM PST by Enterprise
Don’t be scared. It is bogus. Whoever the doctor is or the writer is should know that red blood cells when in the blood stream do NOT have nuclei. The doc did not mention which blood cells he examined...my guess is he doesn’t know there are different types of cells in the blood. White cells have nuclei....red cells in the blood don’t. He also states the cells nuclei are destroyed and forming gold like tube structures....what is a gold like structure?
The article was obviously written by a psychotic person who is inserting words that he does not understand into phrases.
Go to the intake ward at a emergency psych hospital and you will hear plenty of “word salad” like that.
Take your lady-tiger questions and shove them. You have put no effort into the debate and just keep changing the parameters.
Your conjecture may be rooted in reality.
Look into Jason Hall if you want to touch the monolith.
“Take your lady-tiger questions and shove them. You have put no effort into the debate and just keep changing the parameters.”
What debate. You made a claim which you cannot support and all you have now are personal attacks.
My full post. You picked one sentence snd left the other out.
“Don’t know about this particular story, but Pfizer stated in the beginning that pregnant women should not have unprotected sex. The wording was more obscure so many people interpreted (perhaps rightly so) that shedding can take place by being in close proximity”
I was going by memory from a year ago. So, plz don’t pick and chose from my post. As I specifically said after - “that shedding can take place in close proximity “. There’s no reason to be so nasty. You can think what you want. But, the fact that you had not even heard of this report says you are very limited in your exposure. I’m trying to be civil - you want something entirely different.
Same here
ROTFLMAO!
This will be my last post to you on this subject.
“But, the fact that you had not even heard of this report says you are very limited in your exposure”
I knew the source of your conspiracy. It is well documented.
I am surprised that you linked and misquoted it is disturbing.
“This will be my last post to you on this subject.”
OK. At least you know know your post was false.
https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/118/19/e2024998118.full.pdf
Tell me again there is no vaccine that has used it.
This is utterly ridiculous.
Graphene, if there was any in the vaccine, would be in the picogram levels.
People are not becoming magnetic.
The author is Philippe van Welbergen, who bills himself as: Certified Laser Specialist, Philippe’s area of specialty is aesthetics and health improvement utilising homeopathy and homotoxicology
Shame on you for posting this crap.
Thank you. But did you mean to send that to me?
I think it was meant in reply to 117
Shame on you for posting this crap.
Shame on you for NOT even pinging the OP...just posting a blind post, criticizing the OP. 🙄
Curious to know if you think what happens in the lab is what happens in the processing facility, i.e. what happens on the drawing board is what happens on the manufacturing line?
And secondly, do you think Fauci and high-level individuals at CDC, Pfizer, Moderna are all honorable truth-tellers and inspiring examples of ethics and integrity?
Now, Fury, is this being nice....to talk about ‘one FReeper in particular’, without so much as a courtesy ping?
You’re going to lose your official $hot Warning Thread Monitor status, if this continues.
😂
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.