Posted on 01/08/2024 6:24:55 AM PST by 1Old Pro
Nerves of steel. Even if you’re smart and have your facts at hand, it’s difficult to pull off a performance like this with such poise. An absolute tour de force. Couldn’t have done better
My takeaway as well.
Yours is a nice take on Elise......enjoyed reading it.
Yep, kept correcting the host with facts, smooth transitions, making strategic points, answering the questions very well.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/07/politics/elise-stefanik-january-6-prisoners-liz-cheney/index.html
I would not use the term “hostages”.
I would use the term “political prisoner” for many.
There were some violent people who should just be called convicted criminals.
Well stated and concise. No reason our reps cannot enunciate it similarly.
BOY, you guys are easy. She’s a Harvard grad and a YGL of the WEF!
Their not all bad, Tom Cotton comes to mine, even Ted Cruz has his good moments.
Their = They’re
If she is chosen by Trump as a VP running mate she will definitely be a MAJOR ASSET and ONE of the BEST CHOICES possible.
+1
I would have no issue with her as Trump’s running mate.
She did not accept the false premises.
“Interesting that the comments on YouTube are overwhelmingly against Stephanik.”
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Because half the country are Leftist nitwits (sorry for the redundancy).
Also, keep in mind that YouTube is owned by Google, who are widely known for censorship, distortion, and mis- dis- mal-information. Doubtless they and other Leftist outlets and entities employ nitwits to saturate comment sections and forums with globalist propaganda.
Never be discouraged to engage online with these zombie lemmings. You are NOT outnumbered, and with the Truth you will ALWAYS have the upper hand to decapitate these Walking Dead.
Which is critical, a tried and true media strategy to play gotcha.
elise doesn’t put up with much... she should have mentioned the fact that the courts didn’t rule against trump’s evidence... they didn’t hear the case in most instances.
Agree, there was an opening there.
I give her an A-
She let the reporterette get away with saying at least 3 times that Trump had "been to court 60 times and lost 60 times" over election fraud. She needed to counter that for 60 times, evidence was not allowed to be presented, which is why the left says there is no evidence of fraud.
But yes, out of the females available for VP, she would be the best. And I only say that because I think Trump has made up his mind that he will have a female running mate.
Nimrata must hate Stefanik -- Mwah-ha-ha!!
agree, see 36 and 37.
You're CORRECT!... and THAT is the CORE ISSUE of the problem!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.