Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fani Willis’ Case Is So Tainted By Self-Dealing and Impropriety That The Entire Case Must Be Dismissed Without Prejudice
GATEWAYPUNDIT ^ | 1/17/2024 | Paul Ingrassia

Posted on 01/17/2024 7:04:23 AM PST by bitt

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: bitt

Fanny will keep pushing this case forward as if nothing happened. No one is going to hold her accountable for her crimes. She and her BF know this, which explains why they had no fear of getting caught stealing money from the taxpayers and fabricating a phony case against Trump and his associates.


41 posted on 01/17/2024 8:01:59 AM PST by Dan in Wichita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piytar

Agree with you about the word “prejudice”.
That error alone reflects very poorly on the article writer’s ability to communicate; suggests he/she is less than competent as a reporter of legal matters.


42 posted on 01/17/2024 8:09:32 AM PST by Honest Nigerian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bitt

bttt


43 posted on 01/17/2024 8:39:00 AM PST by Pajamajan (Pray for our nation. Never be slave in a new Socialist America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

The author wrote, “without prejudice.” And based on this sentence, he meant what he wrote:

“Therefore, the only just remedy is to dismiss the indictment without prejudice, reassign the investigation to another District Attorney, and let them start from scratch with a new special purpose grand jury and, depending on the outcome, a new regular grand jury to see if a new indictment can be returned.”


44 posted on 01/17/2024 8:41:55 AM PST by Theo (FReeping since 1997 ... drain the swamp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44
"have the same concern, that vote tampering evidence is about to come out in court that the left has been trying to keep suppressed. Killing the case will let the lie that Biden won in GA stand."

🤔

45 posted on 01/17/2024 8:42:25 AM PST by Pajamajan (Pray for our nation. Never be slave in a new Socialist America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Honest Nigerian

You didn’t read the article.

If you had read the article, you’d realize that the author indeed meant “without prejudice.”

And no need to refer to the author as “he/she.” The name “Paul” means that the author is a “he.”

That error alone reflects very poorly on your ability to communicate.


46 posted on 01/17/2024 8:44:08 AM PST by Theo (FReeping since 1997 ... drain the swamp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

Maybe read the article.


47 posted on 01/17/2024 8:45:15 AM PST by Theo (FReeping since 1997 ... drain the swamp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bitt

too tainted...should be dismissed “with prejudice”


48 posted on 01/17/2024 8:45:51 AM PST by stylin19a (A study found that women who carry a little extra weight, live longer than the men who mention it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

The author meant what he wrote: “without prejudice.” Read the article.


49 posted on 01/17/2024 8:45:57 AM PST by Theo (FReeping since 1997 ... drain the swamp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

Why use the pronoun “they”? The author is a man. The pronoun is “he.”

And, yes, HE meant what he wrote: “without prejudice.”


50 posted on 01/17/2024 8:46:42 AM PST by Theo (FReeping since 1997 ... drain the swamp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: piytar

I agree that this case should be dismissed *with* prejudice.

That said, the author does understand what “without prejudice” means, as he explains in his article.


51 posted on 01/17/2024 8:47:33 AM PST by Theo (FReeping since 1997 ... drain the swamp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Theo
That said, the author does understand what “without prejudice” means, as he explains in his article.

Yeah caught that on the re-read...

52 posted on 01/17/2024 8:48:32 AM PST by piytar (Do NOT forget Ashli Babbit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Theo
In particular,

Therefore, the only just remedy is to dismiss the indictment without prejudice, reassign the investigation to another District Attorney, and let them start from scratch with a new special purpose grand jury

Long article. Missed that on the first skim/quick read...

53 posted on 01/17/2024 8:55:00 AM PST by piytar (Do NOT forget Ashli Babbit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: piytar

Sounds like Fani may be trying to emulate her idol, kamalamadingdong. Perhaps someday there will be a streaming movie, “Fani Does the GA Statehouse”


54 posted on 01/17/2024 8:57:10 AM PST by jpp113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: jpp113
“Fani Does the GA Statehouse”

Ewww. That would have to be a pay-per-view, as in Fani would have to pay people to view.

55 posted on 01/17/2024 9:13:29 AM PST by piytar (Do NOT forget Ashli Babbit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: bitt

High up Georgia Republican officials are all in for putting Trump in prison. That’s might just be a problem here.


56 posted on 01/17/2024 9:15:25 AM PST by Sir Bangaz Cracka (Poor 'lil Travon bees slamming dat white cracka'a head into dat sidewalk causin he be scared)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

“I could not even count all the cases I’ve seen of incompetent gubmint employees “failing upwards” to high-paying positions.”

But only if they’re Democrats or RINOs.


57 posted on 01/17/2024 9:20:30 AM PST by Danie_2023
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bitt

People forget that Democrats ran Georgia for over 100 years. Just because some “became” Republicans in order to get elected and take over the Republican party in Georgia doesn’t mean they are really Republicans.


58 posted on 01/17/2024 9:29:02 AM PST by Rlsau1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theo
Yes, me too.

I'd have preferred "WIth Prejudice", so it could not be refilled or prosecuted by another team.

59 posted on 01/17/2024 9:39:52 AM PST by G Larry ("XFKAT" We can't keep spelling out "X Formerly Known As Twitter"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Theo

I figured that out because the idiot wants the Governor to tell the AG to start all over again from the beginning, which is just another way of keeping Trump bogged down in endless legal process.


60 posted on 01/17/2024 10:09:15 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson