Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BBC Reporter Tries to Lecture Guyana President on Climate Change, Immediately Regrets It
The Daily Fetched ^ | 31 Janaury 2024 | Jason Walsh

Posted on 03/31/2024 4:36:39 AM PDT by Sam77

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Sequoyah101

The climate has always been changing. Man has nothing to do with it.


21 posted on 03/31/2024 7:12:37 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Sam77

Remind me, does the UK still have a massive oil extraction operation in the north sea?


22 posted on 03/31/2024 8:07:57 AM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam77

BBC climate clown ideologue “reporter” kicked to the curb


23 posted on 03/31/2024 8:10:22 AM PDT by dennisw (Why is the rabbit unafraid? Because he's smarter than the panther.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam77

This is the type of defense/attack all interviewees should adopt when the “reporter” frames the issue with a lie. Challenge the leading comment/question. Don’t let interview/lecture go beyond that.

Saw a similar interview of a Brit politico when some weasel led off with something like: “people are asking questions....”. Politico’s response (while snacking to show his contempt) : “which people, give me names” “which precise questions?”. He refused to let the interview go further without response. Reporter has his script and kept on without responding so when the politico finished his snack he walked off.

Give them nothing. Do not compromise. Not on anything.

These are animals that will corrupt the definition of words and then attack you. Demand definitions or treat them with the contempt they have earned.


24 posted on 03/31/2024 8:19:11 AM PDT by bobbo666 (Baizuo, )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101

[[I enjoyed that. Just one problem, he still gives credence to globull warming by arguing his forests offset it.]]

Yup- good point- i was a bit dismayed that he did that- He could have pointed out that the earth’s total forests are way more than enough to absorb CO2 with lots to spare- and point out how insignificant man’s total CO2 really is- and point out that there is nothing that needs to be done about a purely natural process-


25 posted on 03/31/2024 9:14:43 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Sam77

The more CO2, the better the world will be - because that means longer growing climates, more areas that can grow better and longer food.

The plants absolutely have to have CO2 to live. If we reduce CO2, we reduce the planets growing season, and then, reduce the actual CO2 the powerful want to reduce, us plebes.


26 posted on 03/31/2024 10:18:29 AM PDT by ro_dreaming (Who knew "Idiocracy", "1984", "Enemy of the State", and "Person of Interest" would be non-fiction?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson