Skip to comments.
59-41 WOMEN TO MEN RATION - DRUDGE
DRUDGE REPORT
Posted on 11/02/2004 12:08:33 PM PST by over3Owithabrain
explains a lot
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: bastardmediawhores; drudge; lyingmedia; mediaskerryboost
To: over3Owithabrain
2
posted on
11/02/2004 12:09:02 PM PST
by
mrplind
(The greatest threat to the United States is not "terrorism," it's "liberalism!")
To: over3Owithabrain
Makes some sense, more likely to not be working this time of day.
3
posted on
11/02/2004 12:09:06 PM PST
by
Kornev
To: over3Owithabrain
Sorry, I was excited and didn't preview. Exit polling was 60 percent women!!!!
To: over3Owithabrain
OK, not panicking anymore. The next time there is an incremental piece of bad news, however, I will again panic.
5
posted on
11/02/2004 12:09:48 PM PST
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along)
To: over3Owithabrain
Damn! That's a cause for skew!
6
posted on
11/02/2004 12:09:49 PM PST
by
July 4th
(You need to click "Abstimmen")
To: over3Owithabrain
practicing gluteus protectus with the qualifer, eh Drudge?
7
posted on
11/02/2004 12:09:54 PM PST
by
Keith in Iowa
(At CBS - "We don't just report news - we make it - up.")
To: over3Owithabrain
Ooooohhh. Now I understand. And what a surprise. The MSM is pushing bogus polls. Who'd have thunk it.
8
posted on
11/02/2004 12:10:16 PM PST
by
Rokke
To: over3Owithabrain
IGNORE EXIT POLLING
Why do people get hung up on that crap?!?! Its what got us into the FL mess.
9
posted on
11/02/2004 12:10:26 PM PST
by
smith288
(I have posted over 10,000 times. The more I post, the more intelligent you become!)
To: over3Owithabrain
VOTE VOTE VOTE.
This is obiviously a suprresion attempt.
TELL YOUR FRIENDS TO VOTE! I DID!
10
posted on
11/02/2004 12:10:32 PM PST
by
fooman
(Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
To: mrplind
Women have a higher probability of voting for Kerry, while men are more prone for Bush - means that as men catch up, polls will move to Bush.
11
posted on
11/02/2004 12:10:38 PM PST
by
trebb
(Ain't God good . . .)
To: over3Owithabrain
And this is why...
when in doubt
I vote women out
12
posted on
11/02/2004 12:10:39 PM PST
by
riri
To: Rodney King
"The next time there is an incremental piece of bad news, however, I will again panic"
You can follow my lead!!!
To: over3Owithabrain
59-41 WOMEN TO MEN RATION - DRUDGEWomen are now rationed? ;o)
14
posted on
11/02/2004 12:10:51 PM PST
by
4CJ
(Laissez les bon FReeps rouler)
To: over3Owithabrain
another dumb post w/ no information or sourcing
15
posted on
11/02/2004 12:11:01 PM PST
by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
To: over3Owithabrain
Normally I wouldn't mind that ratio, except at the ballot box.
16
posted on
11/02/2004 12:11:01 PM PST
by
thoughtomator
("!Allahu Snackbar" - the war cry of the pajamadeen - Let's stop VOTE FRAUD NOW! Write your reps!)
To: over3Owithabrain
But when do the conservative mothers and housewives vote? When do the security moms vote?
17
posted on
11/02/2004 12:11:02 PM PST
by
MHT
To: over3Owithabrain
I'm beginning to smell a great big commie rat! :) We should ban exit polls here at FR, but the 59-41 women thing would suddenly have me very worried if I was a Kerry supporter.
18
posted on
11/02/2004 12:11:11 PM PST
by
kesg
To: riri
What is the ratio typically at the end of the day?
19
posted on
11/02/2004 12:11:27 PM PST
by
DAC21
To: over3Owithabrain
So, woemn between the ages of 41 and 59 are rationing men? Are they afraid they will run out of them? Interesting... I hope I don't get rationed. I'm not that kind of guy.
20
posted on
11/02/2004 12:11:34 PM PST
by
Chad Fairbanks
("I don't worry about Muggers. My biggest fear is Poachers." - Elizabeth Edwards)
To: 4ConservativeJustices
LOL - I wish ! Mod, feel free to delete this thread - I see there is one with better typing already up!
To: over3Owithabrain
Drudge is posting this GARBAGE to get people to his site.
EXIT POLLS ARE WORTHLESS IN CLOSE ELECTIONS.
22
posted on
11/02/2004 12:11:58 PM PST
by
1Old Pro
To: thoughtomator
hopefully the next sample will be 70% male white business owners...
...f*cking ridiculous.
To: over3Owithabrain
60% women and Kerry only got a one point lead out of it? There is hope for my sex yet!
24
posted on
11/02/2004 12:12:25 PM PST
by
Eepsy
(Today's Read-Aloud: Doctor Who and the Talons of Weng Chiang Junior Target)
To: over3Owithabrain
25
posted on
11/02/2004 12:12:38 PM PST
by
Crawdad
(Take a camera to the polls.)
To: over3Owithabrain
Thats because most men will go after work!
26
posted on
11/02/2004 12:13:00 PM PST
by
TheGunny
To: Eepsy
Suddenly bad news turns to good!
To: over3Owithabrain
Mod, feel free to delete this threadWhy? This IS FreeRepublic!
28
posted on
11/02/2004 12:13:44 PM PST
by
4CJ
(Laissez les bon FReeps rouler)
To: over3Owithabrain
If we are that close base on that ratio, then we will be fine considering we were tied or kerry was slighty ahead with 45% 47% ratio in some polls with women.
Chill pills for everyone!
29
posted on
11/02/2004 12:14:17 PM PST
by
The South Texan
(The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCNN NYLATIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
To: finnman69
another dumb post w/ no information or sourcingDrudge is reporting at his website that this exit poll is based on 59-41 women. Thinking out loud, if the rumored four point lead for Kerry in Ohio, or rumored one point lead in Florida (or even four points, makes no difference) is based on this sample, he is so screwed.
30
posted on
11/02/2004 12:14:42 PM PST
by
kesg
To: SoCal Pubbie
OMG! This pisses me off to no end.
That's it for me. No more exit polling today. Fool me once...
31
posted on
11/02/2004 12:15:27 PM PST
by
CSI007
To: kesg
FYI in 2000, the breakdown by sex was 52% women 48% men
32
posted on
11/02/2004 12:16:24 PM PST
by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
To: DAC21
What is the ratio typically at the end of the day?Slightly more than half women -- 52-48 or 51-49.
33
posted on
11/02/2004 12:19:14 PM PST
by
kesg
To: over3Owithabrain
34
posted on
11/02/2004 12:20:53 PM PST
by
Round 9
To: over3Owithabrain
Actually, it makes some sense then. First of all, only about 1/3 of Americans actually vote before they go to work. The reason is obvious...who really wants to get up early in the morning? I never do!
Secondly, it makes a lot of sense that early exit polls consist more of women than men. Think about it. What major group of Americans would have the ability to vote during the day? Stay-at-home Moms, perhaps? Polls have consistently shown Kerry beating Bush among women, while Bush is solidly beating Kerry among men.
All this means is that an exit poll done in the middle of the afternoon is as useful as the old kickstand on a Sherman tank and screen door on a submarine.
35
posted on
11/02/2004 12:21:52 PM PST
by
Calvarys_Soldier
("Election Day is my Christmas...and I have a feeling I'm getting that gift I wanted...")
To: kesg
Thinking out loud, if the rumored four point lead for Kerry in Ohio, or rumored one point lead in Florida (or even four points, makes no difference) is based on this sample, he is so screwed. *Assuming* that the women in the exit polls are representative of women in general, which may not be the case. Stay-at-home mothers may be overrepresented in this sample, and I'd imagine they tend Republican. Many single women who tend Democratic are working, and may be voting later (of course, this goes for working married women as well).
36
posted on
11/02/2004 12:23:22 PM PST
by
ThinkDifferent
(A plan is not a litany of complaints)
To: over3Owithabrain
This is BAD news for Kerry-if this ratio of men to women is correct. Democrats only win when they get 55-60% of the women's vote. With that ratio he should be way ahead. If women are splitting evenly Bush is a shoo-in(assuming Bush holds the male vote which 90% of pre-election polls have him doing.
37
posted on
11/02/2004 12:23:59 PM PST
by
Larry381
(The Democratic Party-Celebrating 60 years of aid and comfort to America's enemies)
To: MHT
That's what I'm saying. Just having 60% women voting doesn't excuse the poor showing. The women who are voting are likely GOP women-- stay-at-home moms and homeschool moms and such.
38
posted on
11/02/2004 12:27:30 PM PST
by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
To: ThinkDifferent
I saw working moms and dads at the polls this morning before 8 AM. A couple had kids with them to show them the process, etc. I know that my husband was in line before the polls opened and there was a line out into the parking lot, full of working people. I only saw four elderly people there at that time of day. I was #336 at 8 AM. My son just voted at 1:30 PM and was #956. We usually have about 400-max during an off-year election. That means that we will have a turnout of 1500-2000 people, at least double our usual number--and we're in an upper-middle-class strongly Republican precinct.
BTW, no one has ever polled me in advance of voting or as I exited.
39
posted on
11/02/2004 12:33:51 PM PST
by
MHT
To: ThinkDifferent
*Assuming* that the women in the exit polls are representative of women in general, which may not be the case. Stay-at-home mothers may be overrepresented in this sample, and I'd imagine they tend Republican. Many single women who tend Democratic are working, and may be voting later (of course, this goes for working married women as well).When I voted -- which was on the first day of early voting -- everyone else in line was either a retiree or a stay at home mom. These exit polls reflect people who voted in the morning, mainly people on their way to work.
If it helps, the last set of major polls showed Kerry leading among women voters, but by only about half of the margin that Gore won four years ago. Even so, if you take this fact, and then skew the sample so that 60% consists of people who support Kerry -- and even THEN he isn't ahead by much (and actually behind in other places) -- trust me, he's in big trouble. Either that, or the sample is too small to be meaningful. The second possibility is more likely.
Bottom line: ignore exit polls. They are meaningless until the end of the day.
40
posted on
11/02/2004 12:38:35 PM PST
by
kesg
To: kesg
Even so, if you take this fact, and then skew the sample so that 60% consists of people who support Kerry -- and even THEN he isn't ahead by much (and actually behind in other places) -- trust me, he's in big trouble. Either that, or the sample is too small to be meaningful. The second possibility is more likely. Agreed.
41
posted on
11/02/2004 12:40:43 PM PST
by
ThinkDifferent
(A plan is not a litany of complaints)
To: ThinkDifferent
Also, word is beginning to get out that the reported numbers are themselves bogus, although the reported sample mix by gender appears to be genuine.
42
posted on
11/02/2004 12:44:58 PM PST
by
kesg
To: kesg
If that's the case, Bush wins easy in WI, wins in FL and Ohio, and MIGHT pull off PA if the rest of the day goes well.
43
posted on
11/02/2004 12:48:13 PM PST
by
RockinRight
(Bush's rallies look like World Series games. Kerry's rallies look like Little League games.)
To: RockinRight
If that's the case, Bush wins easy in WI, wins in FL and Ohio, and MIGHT pull off PA if the rest of the day goes well. FL and OH are the key. If he wins these two, it is almost certainly game, set, and match. PA looks very close.
44
posted on
11/02/2004 12:52:56 PM PST
by
kesg
To: kesg
Santorum was saying earlier that PA looked good for Bush.
45
posted on
11/02/2004 1:06:49 PM PST
by
RockinRight
(Bush's rallies look like World Series games. Kerry's rallies look like Little League games.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson