ammonite fossils in Mount Everest and crocodiles NOW in the Sahara - evolution censors fooled

http://www.daserste.de/programm/tvtipp.asp?datum=06.12.2004 ^ | Dec. 6 | self

[Truth666]

December 6, 2004, 9:45 P.M : the first channel of German television shows the premiere for the film "Time journeys", by Adam White and Sara Ford, supposed to be one more in the series of latest documentaries using the latest computer technology to cover-up the evolution hoax.
But this time something unprecedented happened : an audience of more than 3 million gets the chance to be informed about some of the latest facts exposing evolution, that the censors managed to hide so far.
The film starts by asking two of those facts. How comes you finf
- ammonite fossils near the top of Mount Everest, and
- crocodiles (a new species discovered in 2002, much smaller than the Nile crocodiles) living in the middle of the Sahara.

[Truth666]

How the censors were fooled

How comes that what was supposed to be one more computer generated film to "produce" evidence for evolution theory turned in fact to be the most successful attempt to fool the censors responsible for keeping the public ignorant about the facts exposing immediately the bog lie evolution theory ?
Probably the censors were fooled by how straight forwars was the planned goal of the film - keeping repeating the basic lie for evolution, sugesting that it happened for "millions of years".
Since the film makers just kept repeating what they were supposed to ("let's take a journey millions of years to the past"), the censors just weren't able to realise that in fact the film makers were providing more clues to help the brain washed public understand the truth.
For example in the case of the Sahara crocodiles they showed Sahara wall paintings ("5,000 years old") portraying the animals that lived in the Sahara, while immediately after using the "millions of years" magic words ...

[bpcons]

huh?

[satchmodog9]

ok

[elbucko]

If you keep trying to expose the fraud of evolution, you're only going to make the Devil mad.

[John Valentine]

Doh! I suppose that for some these facts must be absolutely mindboggling.

But only to the uneducated would these facts appear to contradict evolution. In fact they support it 100%, so whoever you are, you should blow off so hard.

[don'tbedenied]

I say we take the flat earthers from here and the DUmmies and give 'em their own site. We can call it Tin Foil Underground Republic.

[John Valentine]

Thyat should have been "NOT blow off so hard".

[Dog Gone]

Hate to break this to you, but land masses shift, mountains are born, seas rise and fall.

It's not really breaking news that we find giant seashell fossils in the middle of west Texas, for example.

[cripplecreek]

I have a whole box full of fossilized sharks teeth I found on the eastern shore of lake Huron.

[Truth666]

"flat earthers" - are they the same people that hide the findings on top of Mt. Everest ?

[Whitehawk]

Convinced me! Now I'm gonna put on my aluminum foil hat so the aliens can't read my mind.

[dangus]

I don't get it... How do Ammonite fossils in the Himilayans disprove evolution? Surely, you do realize that when the Amonites were plentiful, according to scientists, the Himilayan mountains did not exist yet. That was about 500 million years ago. Much more recently (I forget exactly when), India supposedly crashed into Asia, resulting in the relatively brand-new mountain range rising up, lifting sedimentary rocks formed on the ocean floor to heights over 25000 feet.

On the other hand, I'm not sure how biblical literalists explain fossilized sea creatures 29,000 feet up.

Oh, and you do realize that the Sahara was recently quite moist, don't you?

[John Valentine]

Or to find ammonite fossils on top of Mount Everest, which was once on the bottom of a tropical sea, as were ALL the Himalayan Mountains.

As for Saharan crocs, as recently as a few thousand years ago, during the great glaciations, the Sahara was a well watered place, a huge granary in fact, and supported very large human populations, and had wetlands and everflowiing streams. It would have been astonishing indeed if there were NOT crocs living there under those conditions.

All in all, a big "duh"!

[avant_garde]

What??? You mean my ancestors weren't hanging from the trees? Ohhhh, the humanity! Are we seeing idiocy as its evolving???

[dangus]

Satan's Tin-Foil Underground. Hopefully, we can abbreviate that in some way that's *not* rude. :^D

[Truth666]

Great, so you will provide me with what google didn't : a page exlpaining the Sahara crocodiles with evolution ...

[JeffAtlanta]

ping

[John Valentine]

Saharan crocs don't really link up with evolution. They are too recent, and probably died off as the Sahara died out. But some may still live.

Maybe you ought to hone your Googling skills, as I found this very interesting item:

http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/natsci/herpetology/NEWSLETTER/news192p4-6.htm

[Irish_Thatcherite]

Um.... an Irish woman discovered them crocs.

[Fatalis]

For example in the case of the Sahara crocodiles they showed Sahara wall paintings ("5,000 years old") portraying the animals that lived in the Sahara, while immediately after using the "millions of years" magic words ..

The Sahara desert as we know it is only a few thousand years old. What's your point?