Posted on 12/13/2004 7:37:47 AM PST by B4Ranch
To bring attention to themselves
Bureaucratic arbitrariness. Abuse of power. Does it matter?
It's exactly the same reason that "they" decided for all 330 million Americans, that they could not choose to view most of the video shot that day.
Arbitrary and capricious. Abuse of power. Bureaucracies do that. Very well. If allowed to.
Are you for real?
Why would someone fabricate such a story, indeed.
Oh, brother.
"Why would someone fabricate such a story?"
Huh? I can think of dozens of reasons, beginning with seeking publicity.
This story is crap. There's no reason for the government to hide the 9/11 black boxes, had they been found. It's so unlikely that this one guy found any black boxes that the story strains credulity.
He's a publicity-seeker or a nutjob. The site this is posted on is a tinfoil hat site and nothing printed there should be taken seriously.
Use your reasoning ability and you'll come up with several reasons this man might lie.
Or maybe it's just not true.
Just a thought, which apparently didn't occur to you.
I have agree, it would be extremely unlikely that three of four black boxes would be discovered while traversing the site in an all terrain vehicle. I guess they are claiming that the boxes were just lying on top of the rubble in plain sight.
It's pretty evident that the government screwed up without consulting the black boxes.
Not to mention the cleanup at Roswell.
If he could find where I left my TV remote, then I'd be impressed.
"I have agree, it would be extremely unlikely that three of four black boxes would be discovered while traversing the site in an all terrain vehicle. I guess they are claiming that the boxes were just lying on top of the rubble in plain sight."
Of course. Nobody saw them but this guy. The story is so transparent you have to be careful not to bump your head on it as you read it.
Yet, we have Freepers who are willing to accept anything that sounds like a conspiracy, even if it makes no sense. It's amazing.
Just for speculation's sake, what motive could there be to pre-emptively deny or cover-up the discovery of the FDR's BEFORE it was known what was on them?
Of course, it was widely known from the outside that the aircraft were hijacked by the Islamofascists because of the numerous personal cell phone calls describing the scenes inside the doomed aircraft.
So, what reasons could there be to deny or supress this information...?
:cough, cough: Bullsh*t :cough, cough:
- < ;-) (with a tinman tinfoil hat)
At that point, I doubt they would have been recognizable orange boxes with white stripes.
Not just fishy, spoiled fishy.
Unnamed FBI agents ... other witnesses who won't talk ... honorary firefighter ... retired firefighter
This is typical conspiracy theory stuff. I think the guy is just trying to get his fifteen minutes.
Alex Jones has probably already had this guy on and is using him as a source in his videos claiming the WTC attack was carried out by the CIA.
The CVR and FDR in aircraft are fairly easy to recognize. They're painted bright orange and are labeled. However, they are not designed to survive a 2,200 degrees fire for more than a few minutes. While it is certain they survived the impact, they were incinerated in the ensuing fire which was hot enough to melt the large steel rod in the center of the WTC.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.