Skip to comments.Was JonBenet Murder an AIM Signature Crime?
Posted on 02/05/2005 8:41:49 AM PST by Snapple
For some historical background link to http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1335495/posts
Don't blow me off too fast. I am pretty up to speed on my radical (alleged) Indian groups and their activities.
Google some of the information. These events all went to court because they were crimes and terrorism.
Do some searches.
Would you believe it if there was a one armed man seen fleeing the Ramsey House? What if he had a tomahawk in that hand?
Just out of curiosity...how many John Ramsey's are listed in the Boulder phone book? I mean, why choose this John Ramsey? And wasn't there evidence of semen? What's the point of that if they just wanted to kill her?
Have you run your theory by the Ramsey's?
I've been looking since 1996 for someone capable of explaining the Mission Impossible script. I think your the one.
We already know who is directly responsible for JonBenet's death. The evidence points in their direction. Their behavior following her death was highly questionable for people who were supposed to be grieving (e.g., promptly leaving the state, insisting police detectives submit questions in advance and being questioned together).
You want to know who killed JonBenet? It was not some domestic terror group. IT WAS HER PARENTS.
Read the book by Laurence Hogan called The Osage Indian Murders. Hogan is retired from the FBI and a former Congressman.
AIM took the FBI file on the Osage and reworked the material into their propaganda and lies about Pine Ridge.
They even stole the same term, "Time of Terror" to describe the fabricated allegations of killing they made up at Pine Ridge.
The FBI files are on the Internet but are difficult to read and very long. Do a search for FBI+osage+indian
AIM takes this case and turns it on its head. They claim that the FBi protected killers/even killed Indians.
For good information on Pine Ridge go to http://www.noparolepeltier.com
This is very complicated because the people are so crazy that it doesn't seem to make sense.
Very interesting. I never heard anything about this before. You have noted some intriguing coincidences indeed.
AIM was also behind the assassinations of Presidents Lincoln, Garfield, and McKinley, and has been holding Amelia Earhart at an undisclosed location. They are also suspected in the unexplained death of Scipio Aemilianus.
I don't think what we read in the papers or on the Internet about this case is exactly what the police have.
They failed to make a case against the parents. I don't know about you, but if I flipped out and killed my child the police would find my fingerprints and evidence everywhere. The average parent can't clean up after a murder.
It is a well-documented fact that AIM activist and Peltier's lawyer tried to manipulate the Ramsey investigation through his clients.
You need to wonder why an AIM activist is cooking up fake witnesses and why his clients are trying to illegally manipulate grand juries. Read the Boulder papers.
Bump for reference
You're entitled to your opinion and I'm entitled to mine....the parents had nothing to do with it.
Okay I didn't blow you off. I read your article. Now, I'm blowing you off. hogwash
You are going to have to eat your words. I have been watching Lee Hill manipulate the Ramsey investigation for years. He even gives information to an internet site.
But when it is time to test his credibilty in a court of law--he heads for the hills.
He carries guns, bags of knives and little thin knives that I think are burglar knives. They have a special name.
Time to up your meds?
I have never thought the parents were involved.
I've always suspected that someone entered their home earlier, waited in the basement for them to come home that night, and then waited for them to go to sleep.
"It is a well-documented fact that AIM activist and Peltier's lawyer tried to manipulate the Ramsey investigation through his clients."
This is intriguing.
Then provide the documentation.
On the other hand, if the Ramsey's are guilty (As I think they are) the secret is concealed by the discipline of only two conspirators, each of whom has a vested interest in maintaining the secret. IMO A much more plausible explanaton for this murder.
Also, a wealthy individual such as Ramsey would have a personal attorney. That attorney would immediately, upon hearing of the murder, call his client and say, "do not talk to anyone without me present, and don't answer any questions." --S.O.P.
It makes them look guilty, but if they are innocent, they haven't wound up in prison.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.