Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jackson's Diamond Wedding Ring to Debbie Rowe For Sale )EBAY)
Ebay ^ | March 3, 2005 | Debbie Rowe

Posted on 03/04/2005 12:59:23 AM PST by A CA Guy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last
To: A CA Guy

I think that your assumption,re this ring,is correct.


81 posted on 03/09/2005 5:17:47 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Deb

Does it? I don't think I get that channel.


82 posted on 03/09/2005 5:19:22 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
If so, that would be an act of financial desperation due to debts.

The OTHER possibility would be that that wasn't Rowe and perhaps why the offer was pulled.

I think it was her, she pulled the offer to screw Ebay and is making a sale to someone.
83 posted on 03/09/2005 5:27:47 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

I don't have a "feel" for this and so,no educated guess from me.


84 posted on 03/09/2005 5:37:03 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
It's all speculation from any of us.

The strange things is that at the time he supposedly gave Rowe the ring in Australia,he was still half a billionaire.

You would think a half billionaire would get a ring with far more perfect stones worth a million, not 2-3 thousand.

Even if this ring is an after thought just before marriage, unless the jewelry show was a goodwill store, there had to be some 50K rings lying around to sell.

It all makes no sense.
85 posted on 03/09/2005 7:03:26 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
NONE of it makes any sense,from Rowe agreeing to be an incubator,to her giving up the children,to this marriage being a fraud,to her never living with her own children or seeing them,or the fact that the kids are white. Michael Jackson used to be fairly dark and have a full compliment of Negroid features,which WOULD have translated into "his" children having more than a few of his physical traits.
86 posted on 03/09/2005 7:18:14 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Maybe the untold portion of that story is that Michael paid to do genetic manipulation to his DNA before introducing to her, or the eggs(children) were manipulated before they were growing into people.

Could be, he would be the person who could pay a million to have some mad scientist do it.

Again, we don't know. IMO, anything on this thread is guesses, speculation, perhaps rumor and our shock at how cheap the ring was.


87 posted on 03/09/2005 7:22:50 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Cheap AND ugly!

I don't think that genes can be manipulated THAT much,at this time...no matter how much money one has.

88 posted on 03/09/2005 7:38:44 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

OK, then those babies being snow white must be the way it goes.


89 posted on 03/09/2005 8:21:45 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

With a WHITE sperm donor,yes.


90 posted on 03/09/2005 8:22:55 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Would have not been necissary I would think.


91 posted on 03/09/2005 8:26:21 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

Oh yes it was,since Michael wanted only white children.


92 posted on 03/09/2005 8:58:09 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson