Posted on 03/24/2005 3:39:26 PM PST by pulaskibush
is that supposed to be funny?
Yes. There is corruption to bilk vulnerable adults out of their money. They probably figured they couldn't get any more out of Terri's case so they're starving her to death now. Gotta make room for more vulnerable adults to bilk.
I'm not waiting on anybody. It was the the judge himself who offered the rehearing. I was just offering my opinion on why he would have changed his mind. I don't think my opinion was illogical - in that being tainted by the Clintons may not be such a good idea anymore since the democrats' power is fading fast.
I just don't believe every judge appointed by Clinton was one of his sycophants. In fact, it's been stated that in some cases - the liberals have had to shop around to find a judge who will do what they want. That tells me that not all of them are willing accomplises.
With judicial immunity--a protection judges have long granted themselves by common law--Greer can do anything he damn well pleases, as long as he's acting as a judge.
I'm sure the photo was real, I was just drawing comparisons to vampires.
Whittemore is probably on the phone as we write, getting his democrat instructions as to how to parse this newer material so that he can say, 'sorry, you don't have much of a chance to win so I'm going to refuse to review this case so admirably judged by our, er Florida's judge Greer'. This appointee is tasked with insulating the starvin' judge so the democrats don't risk being embarassed by a possible Terri Schiavo improvement with therapy.
What's this about a judge ordering a rehearing? I missed that. Which judge? Greer?
That's interesting info - and you're right - just because you ask them about her doesn't mean they're telling the truth.
And .. I guess you could consider that she might have resigned because of the fraud investigation - so while she WAS a member of the board she no longer is.
Well .. I'll keep my eye open for that info.
Our legislative branches were supposed to keep the judicial branches clean through the use of impeachment, but the legislative weenies don't have the backbone to bring about impeachment in all but the worst cases. Furthermore, the 'Rats have found an unruly judiciary to be in their best interests, which makes impeachment even more unlikely. If the legislative weenies won't do their job of keeping the judiciary under control, the people need to take over the job and to do that judicial immunity needs to be eliminated.
Well .. I've been told Greer's wife isn't a board member - so I don't know which is true.
Regardless .. I just feel this judge has leaned toward the husband and just won't take any evidence to the contrary.
And I have read that there was some motion or something about the husband being replaced as her guardian in 11/02 - and it's never been acted upon.
But .. that's how they hide things .. it has so many fingers that you can't find all the pieces.
I've noticed this is a characteristic of the LEFT .. if you look at some of their websites, they have lists and lists of other leftist organizations which support them. It's mind boggling.
I'm not sure I heard that Congress issued Greer a subpoena - I thought it was mainly the Shindler family and Terri.
The federal guy - Whitten?? something - he already turned them down once before - but he called a hearing for 6 pm ET - as far as I know - there has been no ruling from that hearing .. or if there is I missed it.
Here's a link to a new story:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1370152/posts
I would suspect that this would cover him against lawsuits as well?
Red
Thank you!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.