Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RUSH: Live Thread - Schiavo vs Elian - Compare and Contrast

Posted on 03/28/2005 9:18:27 AM PST by fishtank

Rush: The 11th Circuit Court had said "No" to Johnny Reno, but she went ahead and took custody of Elian anyway...........................


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 11thcircuit; elian; janetreno; rush; schiavo; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-137 next last
To: Double Tap
Is Rush really saying that since J. Reno violated the law, it is OK for us to do the same?

I'm not hearing him say that... yet.

21 posted on 03/28/2005 9:35:41 AM PST by Not A Snowbird (Official RKBA Landscaper and Arborist, Pajama Duchess of Green Leafy Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the 9
Jeb Bush could have gone to take a look for HIMSELF, maybe even a photograph.

But then,

22 posted on 03/28/2005 9:35:55 AM PST by Diogenesis (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Double Tap

Rush points out that Terri Schiavo's medical condition has been misrepresented and the media perpetuates it so public opinion goes against Governor Bush going in. He also points out that the Clinton Justice Dept. did what they wanted and had the support of the media and public even though they went against the two courts.


23 posted on 03/28/2005 9:36:15 AM PST by sheikdetailfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TBP
It also shows that Jeb and Dubya have the power to step in and save Terri,,,if they really wanted to.

Ah, so Bush and/or Jeb should emulate Slick and Reno's blatant abuse of power with Elian? I'd hope not.

24 posted on 03/28/2005 9:37:01 AM PST by dirtboy (Drooling moron since 1998...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

"The judges ahve made their decision. Now let them enforce it."


25 posted on 03/28/2005 9:37:42 AM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick

To cubicle bound: Rush is now comparing Tom DeLay's dad's case to that of Terry Schindler.


26 posted on 03/28/2005 9:38:44 AM PST by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

All that may be true. It doesn't justify our following in the steps of the Clinton administration.


27 posted on 03/28/2005 9:38:53 AM PST by Double Tap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TBP
"The judges ahve made their decision. Now let them enforce it."

They did, apparently, at the local police level.

28 posted on 03/28/2005 9:39:05 AM PST by dirtboy (Drooling moron since 1998...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Judges are often wrong. Their mistakes must be resisted.


29 posted on 03/28/2005 9:39:27 AM PST by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
They did order Elian deported, but they had to ignore Federal immigration law in order to make that order.

If a Cuban citizen arrives on our shores, they are automatically allowed to apply for asylum due to the Castro regimes cruel and inhumane aspects. The 11th didn't see fit to 'give' Elian that right, because he wasn't an adult. The law doesn't say that he had to be an adult. So the 11th 'interpreted' the law to mean he had to be.

The rationale behind all of this, IIRC, was that since the mother 'kidnapped' her son in order to make the trip to the US, the father's guardianship rights trumped Elian's human rights. It was, in retrospect, a precursor to the Shindler-Schiavo case. The question decided there leads directly to now. Does a guardians 'right' to make a decision trump the wards right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness?

The answer, disturbingly enough, seems to be yes.
30 posted on 03/28/2005 9:39:33 AM PST by ex 98C MI Dude (Our legal system is in a PVS. Time to remove it from the public feeding trough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

per Rush: "Nobody had to KILL Tom Delay's father in order for him to die."


31 posted on 03/28/2005 9:39:43 AM PST by sheikdetailfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Fan_Of_Ingraham; Double Tap

Fund talks about what Reno did in this WSJ article:

http://www.opinionjournal.com/diary/?id=110006480


32 posted on 03/28/2005 9:39:59 AM PST by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Double Tap
A Court order?

If a court ordered me not to kill someone who is presenting an imminent threat to the life of myself and my family, am I obliged to the court to not do so?
33 posted on 03/28/2005 9:40:20 AM PST by Fan_Of_Ingraham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: fishtank
I cannot agree the Judge Greer's flatulence is the "law".

Sorry, but it is.
If you don't like a law, get it changed, but don't whine about getting a strict judge that enforces the law as it is.

SO9

34 posted on 03/28/2005 9:41:08 AM PST by Servant of the 9 (Trust Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Fan_Of_Ingraham

No. But that is a red herring anyway as the court will not be there at the time to make a ruling like that.


35 posted on 03/28/2005 9:42:37 AM PST by Double Tap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

A good question Rush asks is: Are food and water ..medical assistance?


36 posted on 03/28/2005 9:42:52 AM PST by sheikdetailfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the 9

Exactly which law was Greer adhering to?


37 posted on 03/28/2005 9:42:53 AM PST by Fan_Of_Ingraham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the 9

Just because Dred Scott was a court ruling, doesn't make it good, true, right or even "the law".


38 posted on 03/28/2005 9:43:26 AM PST by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the 9

"And it was wrong, and we still hate her for it.
We should hate either Bush just as much if they flaunted the law so brazenly."

I TOTALLY disagree. The Florida constitution states in Article I, Section 2, that "[a]ll natural persons, female and male alike, are equal before the law, and have inalienable rights, among which are the right to enjoy and defend life ... ." According to the Constitution, "no person shall be deprived of any right [including the right to enjoy life] because of ... physical disability."

The governor has the supreme executive power and the constitutional duty, stated in Article 4, Section 1, to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed," – and he took an oath of office stating the same. He is SWORN to uphold uphold the constitution, and IS OBLIGATED to safeguard our constitutional guarantee of the "inalienable right ... to enjoy and defend life," regardless of physical disability.

Jeb Bush MAY NOT disregard that obligation, even if a member of the judiciary has ordered otherwise. He is NOT bound by a court order that is AT ODDS WITH A CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTEE!! What part of that are people NOT getting?????

Thomas Jefferson said, "[T]o consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy." Maybe some of us should look up what those words mean??

Abraham Lincoln had the backbone to disregard the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Dred Scott when he issued the Emancipation Proclamation. It wasn’t EASY but it WAS THE RIGHT THING TO DO!!!

Jeb Bush has to choose between the clear mandate of Florida's constitution and a judiciary which, in this case, IS RUNNING AMOK and has acted in defiance of that state supreme law.

A rogue judge CANNOT tell a governor he can't obey the law. Florida’s law ALLOWS the DCF to intervene. Even by asking whether or not a judge can or should be defied shows our ignorance of our own laws and we end up playing into the hands of judicial tyrants such as Greer. By the way, ARE YOU AWARE that one of Greer’s last rulings resulted in a woman being stabbed to death by her husband because he REFUSED to grant a protective order?

Rogue judges are NOT a law unto themselves – even though they (and some uninformed people) think they are. Jeb Bush is the last hope in this matter... barring a miracle of some type.

I must admit that I've wondered what all these people who are just licking their chops over Terri's death would do if God reached down and touched her and COMPLETELY AND TOTALLY restored her and she got up with all of her senses and memory intact. What would they do then? Shoot her because Greer said she's supposed to die? This is how ridiculous and preposterous this has become.

If Jeb Bush is afraid to do his duty, I do not believe that he will hold another term in office. I think God will raise someone else up who will take the hard right over the easy wrong.


39 posted on 03/28/2005 9:45:24 AM PST by jkramos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Double Tap
Let's say we have an expectant mother who is diabetic and turns out that her doctor tells he that she has a 95% chance of dying should she carry the baby to full term.

If a Judge orders her to have an abortion in order to save her life, should she?
40 posted on 03/28/2005 9:49:36 AM PST by Fan_Of_Ingraham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-137 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson