Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Experts Discover that Prince Charles and Camilla Parker-Bowles are Related
My Family ^

Posted on 08/20/2005 11:24:37 PM PDT by restornu

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: battlegearboat

Are you illiterate or did you just post in haste?

No! I am dyslexic but your unkindness is not going to shame me from posting!

There is room on this planet for all of God's children!


21 posted on 08/21/2005 10:39:51 AM PDT by restornu (me and my shadow strolling down the ave.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

What's A Second-Cousin Twice-Removed?


22 posted on 08/21/2005 11:14:56 AM PDT by restornu (me and my shadow strolling down the ave.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: restornu
she said to the prince, “My great-grandmother and your great-great grandfather were lovers, so how about it?”

Must be some stiff, stilted British pick-up line that the rest of the planet can't understand.

23 posted on 08/21/2005 11:16:13 AM PDT by HitmanLV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HitmanNY

I don't know sounds like it...

But than what's in your family tree!:) LOL


24 posted on 08/21/2005 11:44:04 AM PDT by restornu (me and my shadow strolling down the ave.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: restornu

It's hard to determine my family tree. While some people agressively persue marrying into notable families and getting that surname, our family appears to be a collection of people trying very hard to get rid of their surname.

Oh well! :-)


25 posted on 08/21/2005 11:47:52 AM PDT by HitmanLV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: restornu
THAT explains why they look alike ...


26 posted on 08/21/2005 11:52:31 AM PDT by maggief (No 'luffs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
GENEALOGY n. ... In the English-speaking world, all those who take up this pursuit announce sooner or later that they can trace their descent back to Edward III. This should surprise no one with a rudimentary knowledge of mathematics; there are probably one or two well-bred basset hounds who could also trace their descent back to Edward III. What is really surprising is that Edward III seems to be regarded as some kind of ultimate antecedent beyond whom the genealogist does not venture, even though anyone descended from Edward III is also descended from his father Edward II, and so on. The author can guess only that the prudery of the late Victorian age (when genealogy became a family pastime) chose to draw a veil before the memory of Edward II in view of the sybaritic Plantagenet’s bisexual reputation and appalling death (see impalement).

.
-- Peter Bowler, The Superior Person’s Book of Words.


27 posted on 08/21/2005 12:43:52 PM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: investigateworld
"Camilla looked good on here wedding day."

LOL! Good grief, what were you using that day?????

28 posted on 08/21/2005 12:50:54 PM PDT by Selous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: maggief

If you must join the johnny one note posters!

Now this thread on Geneology was not ment to be a place for the inconsiderate to vent......but you are one among many who have no boundary if it feels good do it!

so now what do I do to seek out those after they read all of the silliness going on here!


29 posted on 08/21/2005 12:52:57 PM PDT by restornu (me and my shadow strolling down the ave.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: HitmanNY
she said to the prince, “My great-grandmother and your great-great grandfather were lovers, so how about it?” Must be some stiff, stilted British pick-up line that the rest of the planet can't understand.

No, it's actally Monarchial code. Unscrambled it really means..."Hey, let's not waste a perfectly good mutant gene" ;-)

30 posted on 08/21/2005 12:54:41 PM PDT by Selous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Selous

That sounds like it!


31 posted on 08/21/2005 12:55:50 PM PDT by HitmanLV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: restornu
"Experts Discover that Prince Charles and Camilla Parker-Bowles are Related"

They needed a genealogist for this??! The old-fashioned, Mark I Eyball could have told them that.

32 posted on 08/21/2005 12:58:07 PM PDT by Selous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HitmanNY

It is fun to go back to serveral generation and so much is being harvest everyday of one family history!

You will read things that will make you smile, laugh, cry, or understand some of your mannerisms...some of you will feel so proud for those who enduring and had they not you might NOT be here today!


33 posted on 08/21/2005 12:58:40 PM PDT by restornu (me and my shadow strolling down the ave.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: investigateworld
or B.The new Iams Horse Chow.


34 posted on 08/21/2005 3:54:06 PM PDT by YankeeinOkieville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: YankeeinOkieville

(Takes bow) But series, she did look tons better, maybe I'm a romantic at heart:^).


35 posted on 08/21/2005 6:47:56 PM PDT by investigateworld ( God bless Poland for giving the world JP II & a Protestant bump for his Sainthood!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: restornu
If you would have taken the time to read this thread you would see this is a discussion on Geneology and in the scheme of things and events how you and your family fit in!!

I know this. I'm making a joke. Take it easy.

You must be a Celine Dion fan.

36 posted on 08/21/2005 10:19:10 PM PDT by MitchellC (Foolishness isn't a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Brainhose
Icke is a Coast to Coast regular. His main proof that all the 'important people' are really reptilian aliens seems to be that the fat African chieftain in the picture says so.
37 posted on 08/21/2005 10:23:21 PM PDT by MitchellC (Foolishness isn't a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC

To be honest I have little use for pop culture!


38 posted on 08/21/2005 10:32:59 PM PDT by restornu (me and my shadow strolling down the ave.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: restornu

David Icke is part of popular culture?

We're doomed.


39 posted on 08/21/2005 10:34:27 PM PDT by MitchellC (Foolishness isn't a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: restornu
so now what do I do to seek out those after they read all of the silliness going on here!

No one will be dissuaded by a few jokesters lightening up the topic. Anyone here as long as you should've realized by now that any topic that doesn't have someone hopping mad will make for a thread of 90% silliness, 10% seriousness.

And look at it this way - if we weren't tacking our posts onto your thread, it'd be buried by now.

40 posted on 08/21/2005 10:41:39 PM PDT by MitchellC (Foolishness isn't a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson