Skip to comments.
Dinosaurs may have been a fluffy lot ~~ now they tell us....
The Sunday Times ^
| September 04, 2005
| Jonathan Leake, Science Editor
Posted on 09/06/2005 10:02:44 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
So does this mean that Big Bird is really a velociraptor? That might explain all those rumors of kids disappearing on the Sesame Street set . . .
41
posted on
09/06/2005 11:21:52 AM PDT
by
Buggman
(Baruch ata Adonai Elohanu, Mehlech ha Olam, asher nathan lanu et derech ha y’shua b’Mashiach Yeshua.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
More Godzookie than Godzilla?
42
posted on
09/06/2005 11:23:01 AM PDT
by
Clemenza
(Need new tagline)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Tyrannosaurs might have resembled giant chicks It's one thing to have a flock of 50 chickadees in your yard, but this group would tear up the hedges even worse than moose do.
44
posted on
09/06/2005 11:45:14 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(We in heep dip trubble)
To: Junior
I have never seen a tyrannosaurus that looked like a giant chick. I have seen some big chicks that looked like dinosaurs, but that's another topic.
45
posted on
09/06/2005 12:18:09 PM PDT
by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Implicit in this is that they were warm-blooded.
Why else have feathers?
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The paleoartist Gregory Paul has always insisted on drawing most of his theropods, with the exception of some of the larger carnosaurs, as being feathered. His marvelous book Predatory Dinosaurs of the World was somewhat controversial in this regard when it was published nearly twenty years ago, but instead, it now seems that Paul was ahead of the field in guessing what these magnificient creatures really looked like.
47
posted on
09/06/2005 1:53:57 PM PDT
by
RightWingAtheist
(Creationism is not conservative!)
To: VadeRetro
I have seen some big chicks that looked like dinosaurs, but that's another topic.Dammit VR, I was hoping to finally get a thread without a single Helen Thomas reference! :)
48
posted on
09/06/2005 1:56:46 PM PDT
by
RightWingAtheist
(Creationism is not conservative!)
To: SunkenCiv
Longisquama. In all likelihood, the feathers/scale/whatever were used for mating display than flight or thermal insulation:
49
posted on
09/06/2005 2:00:19 PM PDT
by
RightWingAtheist
(Creationism is not conservative!)
To: RightWingAtheist
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
It's a sketch which is based on the first fossilized skeleton found of Longisquama. I don't know if the general consensus as to what the creature looked like has change in the thirty-five years since, but it hasn't changed much if Google Image Search is any indication.
51
posted on
09/06/2005 2:51:27 PM PDT
by
RightWingAtheist
(Creationism is not conservative!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Wow, another arrogant theory debunked.
52
posted on
09/06/2005 3:17:35 PM PDT
by
Dustbunny
(The only good terrorist is a dead terrorist)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Lame.
When I was a kid I used to have plenty of books about Dinosaurs because I thought they were cool. Now that they look like chickens I doubt I would have been particularly interested.
To: escapefromboston
I may have to keep this news from my youngest grandson.
To: PatrickHenry
Dude! Where can I get a suit like that?? It's just what I need to wear to church, and at appeals to the Property Value Administrator.
55
posted on
09/06/2005 5:11:10 PM PDT
by
Renfield
(If Gene Tracy was the entertainment at your senior prom, YOU might be a redneck...)
To: RightOnTheLeftCoast
Of course they (at least, the "bird-hipped" dinosaurs) were warm blooded. That issue is pretty well settled.
Feathers make good insulation.
56
posted on
09/06/2005 5:13:19 PM PDT
by
Renfield
(If Gene Tracy was the entertainment at your senior prom, YOU might be a redneck...)
To: Renfield
Actually, theropods are saurischians, or "lizard-hipped" dinosaurs. The ornithischians ("bird-hipped" dinosaurs) included the hadrosaurs, ceratopsians, stegosaurs and ankylosaurs, among others, but they were all herbivorous and are not among the candidates for being ancestors of present-day birds.
57
posted on
09/06/2005 6:51:42 PM PDT
by
RightWingAtheist
(Creationism is not conservative!)
To: SunkenCiv
58
posted on
09/07/2005 12:26:53 AM PDT
by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson