Pot icon Tommy Chong makes movie of his imprisonment

reuters.com ^ | 9 10 05 | Cameron French

[A CA Guy]

Non-legal other drugs should never be legal.

Being drunk in your home daily would be called a drunk and that isn't good.

[Know your rights]

it's what the Founders called tyranny of the majority.

I think the regular people call it the law.

So you oppose the Founder's ideal of limited government? That's how the liberals feel too.

[A CA Guy]

Yeah, I love it, at least lurkers will realize they aren't normal conservatism and are in way left field.

[Know your rights]

So should it be against the law to be drunk in one's own home with no minor children present?

Being drunk in your home daily would be called a drunk and that isn't good.

That doesn't answer the question. Why do you even bother to post a reply if you won't answer the question?

[BlackbirdSST]

WTF are you doing on a conservative forum?

You could pose that question to a couple of other's posting here tonight. My guess is, you're asking the alter ego. Blackbird.

[A CA Guy]

Well, you posted to me in another thread (#106) in response to my #100, but your post (quotes) had "nothing" to do with what I said in my #100.

[A CA Guy]

The founding fathers lived in savage territory, we do not, deal with it.

[Michael Goldsberry]

"But you would know that if you had a brain."

No insult there?

"feel-good nanny-state socialism."

Keep digging. Oh, and please give examples.

"WTF are you doing on a conservative forum?"

;)
... being conservative...

[Prime Choice]

Now taking bets that this is a photo of KYR...

"Dig me jolly liberalitarian lifestyle, mon!"

[MRMEAN]

Prime Choice wrote:Anatomy of a discussion with a stoner Liberalitarian: No, really! I can handle muh... I work best when ah'm so frickin'... An' it'sss so wrong fuh— You're not free until you...uhhhhhh... I think I'll just lie here for awhile...

A typical drug warrior substitute for argument. This thread like many earlier ones has critics of the War on Drugs offering evidence, reasoning, and the Drug Warriors making silly and unsubstantiated claims (like A CA Guy's claim that Chong would have died if he hadn't been imprisoned) and ad hominems like this, a version of "you must be on drugs!" While the Drug Warriors always resort to this "you must be on drugs" attack, the IQ of the Drug Warriors usually seems, based on the quality of the reasoning, to be at least 1SD to the left of the critics of the Drug War.

[A CA Guy]

You should not be drunk on a daily basis anywhere. That is a problem you would be having and now the issue is beyond rights and would be more about getting you help before you cost us all a gazillion dollars in medical costs.

[Prime Choice]

I think we can safely say that KYR is more confused than an infant in a topless bar.

[Michael Goldsberry]

LOL!

[Know your rights]

The founding fathers lived in savage territory, we do not, deal with it.

Since you reject the philosophy of the Founders as outdated just like the liberals do, what makes you think you're a conservative?

[Prime Choice]

Give it up, man. The only nations with liberal drug laws like the type you guys seek are socialist nations that require the productive to subsidize the leeches.

If you want that kind of society so badly, why don't you move there, chump? Oh yeah...that'd get in the way of living in your parents' basement, now wouldn't it?

[Know your rights]

your post (quotes) had "nothing" to do with what I said in my #100.

The quotation was from MY preceding post.

[185JHP]

And for the worst of that bunch, as you have said, it's not that they don't know how much social breakdown and chaos their wants would bring - they want it. Malignant desires and malevolence.

[Know your rights]

The only nations with liberal drug laws like the type you guys seek are socialist nations

Socialist states like Sweden have tough anti-drug laws, as do China, North Korea, and Iran. Why don't you move there?

[Sam Cree]

Define "conservative:"

Someone who, without necessarily having well defined guiding political principles, wishes things to remain as they are. In the United States, things have moved pretty far towards statism, so it's not surprising that the conservative position can be fairly authoritarian.

I don't necessarily subscribe to that, but in alot of instances, it's appropriate.

[Know your rights]

So should it be against the law to be drunk in one's own home with no minor children present?

Being drunk in your home daily would be called a drunk and that isn't good.

That doesn't answer the question. Why do you even bother to post a reply if you won't answer the question?

You should not be drunk on a daily basis anywhere.

You just can't stop posting cowardly nonresponses, can you?