What exactly are you people all about? You guessed it: ZOT!

10.17.05 | Oooh, look at me. I'm a profane smartass lefty libertarian troll! Stuck on stupid and smug about it.

[CometBaby]

However, fat stinky men need lovin' too. That's why god created the GOP.

My post was specifically in reference to fat, stinky old men who impose themselves on children. So you think that is okay "because they need love too"? And I highly doubt that any members of NAMBLA vote GOP.

So who gets to enforce their code of morality?

Our code of morality is based on tradition. What is it that makes you think that you have to break down morals and values in order to achieve your private brand of morality?

Abusing children or animals is one thing, evil. What you do with consenting adults is your businss, no one else's. Also, parents should be notified if their child wants an abortion .. etc

According to your previous post you ask, "who gets to enforce their code of morality". Suddenly YOU are labeling something as "evil"?? Gosh isn't that imposing YOUR morality? As to your other points regarding abortion and parental notification, that may be *your* Libertarian view .. but I talk to Libertarians everyday who would strongly disagree with you on that. So... tell us .. what is *the official* Libertarian stand on this? Answer: There isn't one. The Libertarians don't take a stand on it .. they just criticize those who do.

"You do not see a War on Terrorism as self-defense in view of 9/11 ??" Sure. Just not the war in Iraq.

We found Al Queda training camps in Iraq. We know that they were operating out of Iraq. You don't consider a War on Terrorism, beneficial to America? Do you not believe there is organized Terrorism? Do you not believe they had training bases in Iraq? Saddam sent his Security Chief to meet with Al Queda in Kuala Lampur.. 3 months before 9/11. Tell me, do you think that Suddam is innocent? Just like the Democrats .. Libertarians are nothing but a party of protest. No ideas, no solutions .. just rail against Bush.

Here are some facts. The cease-fire resolution of 1991 was dependent on Saddam’s compliance with UN mandates—all of them. He didn’t comply with any of them, ever. The cease-fire was maintained only at the sufferance of the powers with military force; Saddam had no right NOT to be attacked at ANY moment from his first failure to abide by the 1991 cease fire’s demands. At any time after his first failure to meet the demands of the cease fire (Res. 689, I believe it is), Iraq was a legitimate target of attack.

I can understand why you are so frustrated .. the majority of Americans believe there was a connection btw Saddam and 9/11. Most americans don’t need PROOF of collusion beyond a reasonable doubt.

The Anti-War bunch said there would never be elections in Iraq and guess what? There were elections. Then they said that there would be no spread of democracy in the middle east and guess what? There is a lot of good news coming out of that area. The Lebanese (pro Syrian) Prime Minister resigned. Syria announced troop withdrawals. Real elections in Egypt with actual opposing candidates .. no more of this vote for Mubarek or die business. Syria turned over saddams half brother. The Palestinians had their first real *legitimate* election. Israel has turned the captured lands back to Palestine. There is a lot of good news coming out of the middle east. It's not ALL good news .. but it sure looks to me like there is enough to show that Bush's plan is working and what are you doing? Sulking!

In answer to some of the other posts....

You go on to list a whole bunch of stuff that I never wrote using your post to me as a "catch all" to respond to a lot of different people. I really resent that you are TOO LAZY to post to the people who said them. Including them in my post, makes it appear that I said them .. which is a cheap shot. As you can see, I am quite articulate and capable of speaking for myself.

[ladyinred]

Honey, you sure picked a strange nickname for someone who spouts the stuff you do. I sure as heck don't wanna be in your bedroom and I pity any baby that gets anywhere near your womb.