Skip to comments.Democratic Response to President Bush's Speech 11/30/05 (Vanity)
Posted on 11/30/2005 8:18:50 AM PST by pillut48
John Kerry is responding to the President's speech this morning, and I may be mistaken, but did he just out and out call the President a liar??
Not a single word of encouragement for the mission. They are calling for our surrender. Kerry is a french fag afterall. That's why he is a loser and Bush is a winner. He is spouting lies that 80% of Iraqis want us to withdraw. Not a single reporter will ask him where he gets those phony polls.
I could only stand about 10 minutes of Hanoi John on Fox. He spent the entire 10 minutes complaining that Bush used straw men in his speach, while he busily set up his own straw men.
It's often amusing to watch Dem. politicians try to wiggle out of the box W puts them in. It's like watching a train wreck - interesting in a terrible kind of way - to watch liberals try to convince us of their military-support and foreign policy credentials as they quietly sabotage both.
John Kerry has been a traitor for 30+ years. He should be tried as such and given the proper pusnishment that all traitors deserve.
The dems keep making up numbers and keep citing polls with no evidence to back it up. Reed and Kerry now are trying to claim Bush's victory as their own.
I'm sure 80% of Iraqi's DO want us to withdraw, the question has ALWAYS been when - not if. I'm also sure that ALL of those 80% if asked honstly would say, "We want Americans to leave AFTER they help us finish the job properly.
More liberal subterfuge to hide their anti-military, anti-US, anti-Bush agenda.
I sure didn't appreciate his comments that the President always gives speeches like this in front of troops/cadets--what a slap to the face for our military people! >:-(
BTW, did you know Kerry served in Vietnam, and Reed was in the 82nd Airborne? I sense a drinking game coming up from these constant reminders!
When the "insurgency" crumbles in the next few months and Zarquawi is hung from a lamp post, Kerry and Reid will be jumping in front of the cameras claiming it was their advice to the Prez that made it all happen. If I ever meet either of these idiots, I will have a difficult time not b*tch slapping the hell out of them.
That part sounded like prima-donna whining to me, I had to laugh. I'm sure it's not because the President can command audiences in front of troops - it's because the soldiers would boo Democrats off the stage.
Liberals/Democrats can't risk being booed by military folks in a national forum. Ever wonder why Kerry hasn't visited Iraq or Afghanistan? Or why Hitlery (or any Democrat) doesn't talk about her visits or contacts with the military much?
It's because the military KNOWS who is really on its side, they are not fooled by the 'we support our troops but not their CIC' BS.
Be happy Kerry did not get to be POTUS.
I am happy. He retained POS title, though.
Am I the only one who thinks that the dims go home at night and wish to God (or whoever they wish to) they could have the right(!) position on this issue if only the kooks would let them?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.