Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Doctor Who travels to The SCI FI Channel
Gateworld ^ | 01/12/2006

Posted on 01/12/2006 5:04:33 PM PST by Panerai

The good Doctor is finally coming to the United States! The SCI FI Channel and BBC Worldwide Americas announced today that the new Doctor Who series will debut this March on the cable network.

The 13-episode first series (or 27th season of Doctor Who, depending on who you ask) will air Fridays at 9 p.m. Eastern/Pacific starting in March -- taking over Stargate Atlantis's regular timeslot, no doubt after new episodes have finished. The series drew big ratings when it premiered on BBC ONE in the U.K. last spring.

Doctor Who stars Christopher Eccleston as the Doctor and Billie Piper as Rose, his travelling companion. The duo risk their lives in new adventures battling monsters and aliens and travelling in time and space via the famous TARDIS.

"The Doctor's made all sorts of journeys in time and space, but this is one of his most exciting yet," head writer and executive producer Russell T. Davies said. "I'm a huge fan of The SCI FI Channel, and I'm delighted that Doctor Who is appearing on a channel that supports and enhances the entire genre."

The deal also includes an option for the season season of the new series, which stars David Tennant as the Doctor's latest reincarnation and begins airing in the U.K. this spring.

Meanwhile, Who's upcoming North American DVD release has been pushed back from February to July 4 to capitalize on the television debut.

The classic Doctor Who series won the hearts of many science fiction fans in the U.S. during its run on public broadcasting stations, but has never had a wide distribution in the States. As the longest-running genre series in TV history, Who's ever-changing leading men, TARDIS, K-9 robotic dog, and evil Daleks have become cultural icons since the show's original debut in 1963.

Read the BBC's complete announcement at the network's official Web site. Check out fan site Outpost Gallifrey to learn more about the Doctor Who universe!


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: bbc; doctorwho; scifi; scifichannel

1 posted on 01/12/2006 5:04:34 PM PST by Panerai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Panerai
Dullest...sci fi show...ever.

Whenever one criticizes this show, the fans respond that the show isn't about special effects or action. And yet the science fiction ideas are routine, and the characters are twits.

2 posted on 01/12/2006 5:06:42 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (Corporate income tax collections totaled a record $73.5 billion last month-AP 1/12/06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Panerai

I watched it here (in the U.S.) for several years in the late '70s, I believe on PBS. Tom Baker was by far the best of the Dr. Whos.


3 posted on 01/12/2006 5:08:13 PM PST by rightwingintelligentsia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Panerai

I remember my boys watching Dr. Who, during the late 70s and early 80s, I think, when Tom Baker was in the role of Dr. Who...they loved the series, and watched it faithfully...then we moved, and the new area we moved to, had no TV coverage of Dr.Who, so they just did not watch it anymore...I also enjoyed watching it...so maybe now, with Sci-Fi channel picking it up, I will begin watching it again...thanks for the heads up on this one...


4 posted on 01/12/2006 5:09:53 PM PST by andysandmikesmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Just like Battlescar Craplactica, huh?


5 posted on 01/12/2006 5:10:10 PM PST by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afganistan and Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Panerai
Really like the old version from the 80s with Tom Baker and the Darlicks.

The cheesy special effects added character. Like listening to a weak AM radio station.
6 posted on 01/12/2006 5:10:38 PM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

I was in London last April, and caught one show from the new series. Parts of it were interesting, but their casting was horrible. The latest guy that plays Dr. Who has the most insipid grin on his face at all times, and his "acting" (if you can call it that without laughing) ability is at best second rate...


7 posted on 01/12/2006 5:10:56 PM PST by Zeppo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Agreed.


8 posted on 01/12/2006 5:11:05 PM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Panerai

YES!


9 posted on 01/12/2006 5:12:09 PM PST by xcamel (Exposing clandestine operations is treason. 13 knots make a noose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andysandmikesmom

Baker was good. I also like Pertwee's rendition of The Doctor.


10 posted on 01/12/2006 5:13:16 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

I agree, how anybody can torture themselves with that refuse is beyond me.


11 posted on 01/12/2006 5:13:51 PM PST by aft_lizard (What does G-d look like then if we evolved from nothing?See Genesis Ch 1:26-27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

ping


12 posted on 01/12/2006 5:14:53 PM PST by No Longer Free State (No event has just one cause, no person has just one motive, no action has just the intended effect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aft_lizard

I guess some should go back to watching the crap on Oxygen


13 posted on 01/12/2006 5:15:38 PM PST by xcamel (Exposing clandestine operations is treason. 13 knots make a noose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

Battlestar has gone downhill since the first episode aired, I am perfectly happy watching reruns of the old episodes thank you very much.


14 posted on 01/12/2006 5:17:36 PM PST by aft_lizard (What does G-d look like then if we evolved from nothing?See Genesis Ch 1:26-27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

NEW Doctor Who on Sci-Fi ping !


15 posted on 01/12/2006 5:19:08 PM PST by Panerai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia
I watched it here (in the U.S.) for several years in the late '70s, I believe on PBS. Tom Baker was by far the best of the Dr. Whos.

And Sarah Jane Smith ( Elisabeth Sladen ) for the guys.

16 posted on 01/12/2006 5:21:43 PM PST by carlr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: carlr

Oh, man did I have a crush on her. Loved her accent.

Even better than Mrs. Peel.


17 posted on 01/12/2006 5:24:16 PM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

I never saw him...the only one we ever saw was Tom Baker, and we sure did like him...


18 posted on 01/12/2006 5:25:34 PM PST by andysandmikesmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: andysandmikesmom

Pertwee was the actor who immediately preceded Tom Baker (the 4th incarnation of the doctor). Sylvester McCoy also did a good job as the 7th incarnation/regeneration. Hartnell was a little spooky as the first incarnation.


19 posted on 01/12/2006 5:31:26 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: carlr

Sarah Jane Smith was one of the best of the Doctor's stable o' chicks. Birgadier Leftbridge Stewart was also a good sidekick for The Doctor (he provided a stodgy foil for The Doctor).


20 posted on 01/12/2006 5:35:13 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Although I did like Baker as Dr. Who...the 2005 Doctor was even better. And Piper.../tiger growl...if only I were 15 years younger.../sigh


21 posted on 01/12/2006 5:46:10 PM PST by Dr Stormfist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: carlr
And Sarah Jane Smith ( Elisabeth Sladen ) for the guys.

My (then) boyfriend was fond of her too--he said she was a good "screamer."
22 posted on 01/12/2006 5:48:37 PM PST by rightwingintelligentsia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Panerai

Brings back memories of my college days, of being ad hoc faculty contact of my college's SF club (called the Survivors of the Big Bang abreviated SOB2), being a member of a group called Companions of Dr. Who and spending many hours at SF conventions....ah, those were the days...

But I don't think I want to do that again.


23 posted on 01/12/2006 5:51:52 PM PST by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wingnutx; Brett66; RightWhale; EsmeraldaA; Paul_Denton; ShakeNJake; N3WBI3; Nachum; discostu; ...

24 posted on 01/12/2006 5:53:55 PM PST by KevinDavis (http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr Stormfist

Yep, Piper is a stunner.


25 posted on 01/12/2006 6:06:35 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: carlr
And Sarah Jane Smith ( Elisabeth Sladen ) for the guys.

How about Louise Jameson (Leela)?

26 posted on 01/12/2006 6:17:31 PM PST by supercat (Sony delinda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
Whenever one criticizes this show, the fans respond that the show isn't about special effects or action. And yet the science fiction ideas are routine, and the characters are twits.

The stuff may be routine today, but it wasn't in 1963 when the show debuted.

Some parts of the show were just plain silly, granted, and certain production decisions seem pretty questionable, but the show nonetheless provides an interesting glimpse into how television production has changed over the years.

Since the 19th century, people have realized the possibilities for editing film by cutting and splicing. Video, however, was not readily edited. Sections of tape could be cut and spliced together, but such cuts were not precise. Many early episodes of Doctor Who were shot in four or fewer sections. Even when it was necessary to insert film footage, that would often be done "live" during recording. If there was a four-minute film insert, the actors would wait four minutes while the film ran before the camera returned to them.

One of Jon Pertwee's innovations, which some of his fellow actors liked and the producers hated, was swearing when something went wrong in production. This would force the director to stop and reshoot the scene. Otherwise, if not forced to, the director would just keep going right on through mistakes. Even when a wooden sword broke during a sword fight in "The Aztecs", recording continued as the character grabbed another sword off a table and kept fighting (according to the DVD commentary, the sword wasn't supposed to break).

To be sure, the special effects in Doctor Who could be hit-or-miss. This was largely a consequence of doing many of them "live". If tape was rolling and an effect didn't work, too bad. Unless it made a scene unwatchable, it wouldn't be worth re-recording (especially since it may be necessary to redo not just the effect, but scenes before and after).

I will confess to being puzzled by some of the effects, though. Perhaps most notably in "The Dalek Invasion of Earth". In the early days of Doctor Who, each episode's recap of the last episode's cliffhanger would usually be produced by having the actors re-act it. It might not match perfectly, but since nobody had VCRs in those days, nobody would notice. One episode of TDIoE ends with a model shot of a warhead being partially-lowered into a shaft.

The aspect that puzzles me is that when the cliffhanger was shot, the model wasn't completed; it was finished in the week before shooting the next episode. The recap, however, reuses the previous week's shot of the unfinished model, though, which produces a highly-visible continuity error when the continuation of the episode uses the finished one. I wonder why they didn't reshoot the lowering of the warhead since it would only have taken a few seconds and nobody would have noticed the discontinuity from the previous week.

27 posted on 01/12/2006 6:35:37 PM PST by supercat (Sony delinda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: supercat

These guys were cool

28 posted on 01/12/2006 6:54:32 PM PST by Samurai_Jack (ride out and confront the evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Panerai; KevinDavis

"Rose, you were fantastic. Simply fantastic..."


29 posted on 01/12/2006 7:12:22 PM PST by mhking (Tell me what you don't like about yourself...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carlr
And Sarah Jane Smith ( Elisabeth Sladen ) for the guys.

Pssst! Sarah Jane -- with K-9 -- will be back in at least one episode in Season Two (starting in March)...

30 posted on 01/12/2006 7:13:38 PM PST by mhking (Tell me what you don't like about yourself...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dr Stormfist
And Piper.../tiger growl...if only I were 15 years younger.../sigh

She is definitely "drool-worthy"...

31 posted on 01/12/2006 7:14:16 PM PST by mhking (Tell me what you don't like about yourself...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

32 posted on 01/12/2006 7:35:50 PM PST by mhking (Tell me what you don't like about yourself...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mhking

I am stuned! Series!


33 posted on 01/12/2006 7:38:01 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

That's four whole fried chickens and a coke.


34 posted on 01/12/2006 7:50:52 PM PST by satchmodog9 (Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: satchmodog9

Don't forget the dry white toast...


35 posted on 01/12/2006 7:51:59 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Panerai
Ohmygawd, so now there will actually be something worth watching on the Sci-Krap network!?! I watched the Twilight Zone marathon on New Year's Day this year and last year, and I don't think much of anything in between.

Doctor Who is definitely an acquired taste, it's an odd show and if you like British comedy you''ll like it, otherwise... well... The best description I've heard of it was as Star Trek done by the Monty Python troupe. The FX were cheap looking, the acting was over-the-top, the scripts were often silly, but the show was FUN! You never knew where or when the TARDIS would end up, say what you want but it was never boring.

The new show is IMHO the only SF show on worth watching. The FX are top notch, as good as or better than 'Enterprise' or any other Hollywood series and keeps the wacky off-the-wall mood of the original series. The current Doctor isn't my favorite though, and yeah Sarah was far and away my favorite companion, Rose is ok, but kinda in the boring, dime-a-dozen Hollywood blonde mold.

Anyway, fun show and waaaayyyyy too intelligent and well written for the Sci-Krap network. Wonder how long they'll run it???
36 posted on 01/13/2006 7:31:38 AM PST by Gamera977
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Panerai

It's about time.


37 posted on 01/13/2006 8:37:02 AM PST by exile (Exile - Helen Thomas tried to lure me into her Gingerbread House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

It’s the show that’s most highly regarded by SF writers like Harlan Ellison who hated stuff like Star Trek. The SF Encyclopedia, which is a primary scholarly source on the subject matter, ranks it highly as well.


38 posted on 01/07/2008 9:15:04 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Panerai

What, I’ve been watching this on SCI FI for years now, I love it ...


39 posted on 01/07/2008 9:18:29 AM PST by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
Sylvester McCoy also did a good job as the 7th incarnation/regeneration.

When he had a good script to work from (e.g. The Curse of Fenric). With poor scripts (e.g., Dragonfire) it was hard to watch.

The beauty of Tom Baker, and to a lesser extent, Jon Pertwee, was that they could carry the show over the bad storylines.

40 posted on 01/07/2008 9:22:50 AM PST by kevkrom (All those in favor of Thompson, don't raise your hand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

I agree with that 100%. Both had personalities that lent themselves well to good and bad scripts.


41 posted on 01/07/2008 9:27:32 AM PST by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

Have you seen a recent photo of Tom Baker? He has aged something fierce!


42 posted on 01/07/2008 9:36:28 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson