Posted on 01/16/2006 6:48:08 AM PST by beyond the sea
The term "a football move" was purposefully intended to be vague so the referees could keep the games close, TV viewers would keep watching, and the league could charge more for TV advertising.
HOWEVER, when Bettis lost that ball on the 1-inch line, I suddenly started rooting for the Colts: the thought of Bettis ending his career with that play was just too delicious. --- oooh, the sadist in you. ;-)
Hey, is Manning overrated because he's white? ---- Hey, Rush.
The referees did everything in their power to hand the game to Manning.
The interception, the offsides and the pass interference all were blown calls that went to the Colts.
All three were so obvious that it is an insult to say otherwise.
I'm a big fan of the DGFL, the Delayed Gratification Football League. I'm so excited when my team has a great play, but I am even happier because I usually have to wait an extra 5 minutes to see if my cheering is justified. That just makes my elation even more elatier. Of course, sometimes the call doesn't go my way because of the sudden influx of "football moves", but that just gins me up for the NEXT big play where I can sit on pins and needles to see if it really happened or if the opposing team is going to file an injunction against it. Maybe it ought to be called the ACLUFL.....
http://www.nfl.com/fans/rules
Still, that appears to be a "watered down" rule book and definitions...not the "official" NFL Rule Book. I can't find a definition for "football move."
When did I say it was on purpose? It wasnt a clean hit but it wasnt an intention-to-hurt hit.
Im saddened that the Bengals never got the oppurtunity to give it their best shot with the talent that got them there. To me, Pitts win over them isnt as impressive unless Carson plays.
And i dont blame teams not selling to Pitt fans. There is a reason they call it home field advantage.
****
I hear you. You make a great point. I wasn't thinking well. I just let the bizarre fumble cloud my thinking.
God, it would have been nice if THE BUS had just rumbled that ball into the endzone. That fumble was a severe bummer.......... but, thank God for Ben's tackle!
Great idea!
Forget about the call--you have the makings of a real NFL superstar in Troy Opal...opol...apola...this Troy guy.
I love the way he flies headlong over the field and he's not afraid to give up his body by stretching out, knowing he's gonna get hit by the ground or another player.
If it wasn't for the fact he plays for Putzberg, I might become a fan.
How about changing the rules to allow challenges regarding penalties, in BOTH respects. That is, allow a challenge to a penalty that was called, saying that it shouldn't have been called... And, allow a challenge in a play when a penalty wasn't called, but SHOULD have been called.
While we're on the subject: are teams still allowed only two challenges per game? And is a team charged with a challenge EVEN IF they're correct? If so, that's wrong.
LOL!
Karnac The Magnificent?
And that 80 yards away is no guarantee. Pittsburgh's special teams has been know to cough up a long kick return (or 2, or 3, or 4...)
Whenever there's a turnover late by the leading team the first instinct is "what the hell were they thinking", but sometimes they were right. Sean Salsbury said pretty much the same thing on sports center, at first he thought the play was stupid then he started thinking through the numbers and decided that it was the right call, especially when you remember that was the first time in 2 years the Bus lost a fumble. They always say when the game is tight put the ball in the hands of your best player and let him remind you why he's your best player, and that is the call Cowher made, forget the technical name of that play the real play call was "Jerome, go get us to the AFC Championship".
Gotta love Ben's post game interview on that too. Place no blame on the Bus and took no credit for himself, said it was two 1 in a million shots (Bus fumbling and him making that tackle) that just happened to happen on the same play. Good kid.
I hear you.
But, I wouldn't be totally surprised to see him come back again next year. He's running nearly better than ever! He's running over people, and his feet are quicker than ever!
I heard the Sunday Night Football crew discussing the review of a catch and fumble. They made reference to "the receiver must have possession, control and make a football move." Could you define "a football move" as it relates to a catch? --Steve Supica, Canton, Mich.
When a catch is made by a receiver who comes down with both feet on the ground, the "football move" would be: stretching for a first down, diving out-of-bounds or running with the ball. If the "football move" is accomplished, and the receiver is then hit and the ball comes out, it is ruled a catch and fumble, instead of an incomplete forward pass.
Source:Jerry Markbreit former NFL umpire
Just wondering, can you Challenge a Challenge?
Yup, go for the throat and get the two score lead. Fortune favors the bold, I might have even gone for two just because an 11 point lead is a touch more secure than a 10 point lead... might have.
D-CAF! D-CAF! D-CAF!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.