Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Could al-Qaida take over Pakistan? Terrorists would inherit nuclear arsenal, delivery system
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | February 13, 2006 | Joseph Farah

Posted on 02/13/2006 6:43:19 AM PST by TwilightDog

Could al-Qaida take over Pakistan? Terrorists would inherit nuclear arsenal, delivery system

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted: February 13, 2006 1:00 a.m. Eastern

Editor's note: The following report is excerpted from the latest issue of Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin, the premium, online intelligence newsletter published by the founder of WND. Annual subscriptions have been slashed to just $99 a year and include a free copy of Farah's latest book, "Taking America Back." Monthly subscriptions are just $9.95.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © 2006 WorldNetDaily.com

Could al-Qaida ever take over Pakistan?

That is the nightmare scenario considered in the latest issue of Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin, the premium, online intelligence newsletter published by the founder of WND.

Asia Times and the Times of India both report today the Taliban and al-Qaida have already taken "virtual control" of the entire North Waziristan province of Pakistan and "declared" the establishment of an "Islamic state" in the area, gaining a major base for their operations against the U.S.-led forces in Afghanistan.

Osama bin Laden may be the most popular figure in the nation.

Just one man's life is preventing Laden or his allies from getting their hands not on nuclear weapons, which they already have, but a large nuclear arsenal and the means to deliver it anywhere in the world, G2 Bulletin reports.

His name is Pervez Musharraf, the president of Pakistan.

If fair-and-square elections were held today in Pakistan, and bin Laden or someone like him were allowed to compete, there is little doubt the populace would be with such a leader, according to G2 Bulletin sources.

But they haven't had fair-and-square elections in Pakistan for some time – and President Bush, who promotes "democracy" as the antidote to terror, better hope they don't have one soon.

Pakistan not only has at least 40 nuclear warheads, according to most accounts, but it has some of the most sophisticated and feared delivery systems in the world.

Perhaps the biggest worry is the trio of French-built Agosta 90B stealth submarines, each capable of carrying 16 cruise missiles with nuclear payloads.

The Pakistani military is very proud of its subs – and well they should be. They are at the top of the class for French submarines. They were designed by the French company DCN, which, as incredible as it may sound, has licensed Pakistan to produce more at a commercial base.

The project was completed despite a suicide bomb attack with killed 11 of the project's French engineers in front of their Karachi hotel in May 2002. The deal had to be approved by the US government because the plane contains U.S. parts.

While the specs for the Agosta 90B subs say it is equipped to fire Exocet missiles and torpedoes, at a press briefing following the annual naval exercise Seaspark-2001, Rear Admiral Mohammad Afzal Tahir, the deputy chief of naval staff for operations, announced that the Pakistan navy was considering equipping its submarines with nuclear missiles. He suggested the Agosta 90B submarine, with its air independent propulsion system, can deliver nuclear weapons.

Read the full report by subscribing to Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin now.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.wnd.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=48794


TOPICS: Dimensional Doorway; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Opinions anyone? How extravagantly overblown is this scenario with the submarines appear?
1 posted on 02/13/2006 6:43:21 AM PST by TwilightDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TwilightDog
We made sure, in 1975, that North Vietnam inherited no working U.S. nuclear reactor; and in 1979, that the Ayatollah inherited no functional air-to-air missiles from the Shah. With the help of India, I think we can guarantee that no Pakistani terrorist government had nuclear warheads long.
2 posted on 02/13/2006 6:56:46 AM PST by GAB-1955 (being dragged, kicking and screaming, into the Kingdom of Heaven....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GAB-1955


One can only hope.


3 posted on 02/13/2006 7:17:01 AM PST by TwilightDog (("The world is a stage, but the play is badly cast"--Oscar Wilde))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TwilightDog

Probably one of the reasons we are giving so much to the Indians.


4 posted on 02/13/2006 7:17:02 AM PST by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TwilightDog
Perhaps the biggest worry is the trio of French-built Agosta 90B stealth submarines, each capable of carrying 16 cruise missiles with nuclear payloads. The Pakistani military is very proud of its subs – and well they should be. They are at the top of the class for French submarines.

Wasn't there an article that during the Falklands War, Thatcher pressured the French to give the British some override code for the French-built Argentine ships? Of course, that ain't gonna work if the Pakistanis have built their own subs to French plans - they'll leave step 4197,b, install override chip, right out.

Mrs VS

5 posted on 02/13/2006 7:27:57 AM PST by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson