Posted on 04/19/2006 10:56:14 AM PDT by girlangler
By Stephen Hunt The Salt Lake Tribune
Janet Lane - who on Monday got in trouble with a 3rd District Court judge for having too many dogs - was rearrested Tuesday because of yet another pet-related crime. Two years ago, Lane allegedly "dog-napped" a neighbor's registered golden Labrador retriever and paid a veterinarian to neuter it. Lane then dropped the Lab off in the night at a county animal shelter. Lane, 45, was charged with criminal mischief, a class A misdemeanor, in June 2004, but had never appeared in court. She was arrested Tuesday on the outstanding warrant and spent the night in jail. The Lab's owner, Yvette Brimhall, of Herriman, said Wednesday she was stuck with her own vet bills because "Duke" was not provided with a neck cone and injured himself by gnawing at the fresh surgical wound. The dog required emergency surgery. Furthermore, Brimhall said, she and her husband lost potential fees they could have charged for Duke's services as a purebred stud. Lane is a well-known advocate for spaying and neutering pets who has spent thousands of dollars sheltering homeless animals and getting them fixed. But Brimhall said Lane had no right to steal and neuter her dog. "It's not for her to decide," Brimhall told The Tribune. "And how could she drop our dog off without the proper protection? He could have died. I don't see that as a humane act." On Monday, Lane had appeared in court to be sentenced for having five more dogs than the two-per-household allowed by Herriman city. Four months earlier, she had pleaded guilty to three misdemeanors. Judge Stephen Henriod was shocked to learn Monday that Lane had not gotten rid of the extra dogs. He told her she should have shot the extra dogs rather than come to court in blatant violation of the law, and he sentenced her to 180 days in jail. The judge was vilified by animal lovers for making the dog-shooting comment. But he apologized at a Tuesday hearing, insisting he was trying to make a point with Lane and meant no harm to her dogs. Because Lane's friends had meanwhile taken her surplus dogs to a shelter, Henriod said she could be released from jail. But jailers discovered the outstanding warrant in the neutering case and she remained behind bars until Wednesday afternoon. Lane's next court date on that case is April 25 before Judge Paul Maughan. The alleged dog-napping occurred on March 2, 2004, when Lane took Duke to a Salt Lake City veterinarian, according to the charges. A camera at Salt Lake County Animal Control Services caught her dropping the dog at the shelter that night, and recorded the license number of her van. Meanwhile, Brimhall had contacted Lane and other neighbors looking for Duke. She said Lane - who knew Duke - twice denied any knowledge of the dog's whereabouts. Two days later, Animal Services called to say they had identified Duke from his implanted chip, and said the dog had apparently suffered a botched neutering. Lane eventually admitted she was the culprit, but told investigators the Brimhalls were "not completely blameless" because their dog was running loose, according to court documents. Brimhall said Lane typically walks a half-dozen unleashed dogs. And Lane's own female dogs are not spayed, Brimhall said, which is an attraction to male dogs. "I think she's baiting dogs," Brimhall said. But Cheryl Smith, director of Wasatch Humane, called Lane a "long-time responsible dog rescuer" who fosters for shelters, cares for homeless dogs and is "saving animals [and] serving our community." Smith wants Henriod removed from the bench for his dog-shooting comment and is urging pet lovers to file complaints with Utah's Judicial Conduct Commission. shunt@sltrib.com
LOL
Well, at least our dogs are useful! Pauli (my newest) if pretty useless so far, but she has learned to catch a treat!
susie
My dog catches them in the air, so the cats don't have a chance at them. She is pretty good at waiting and watching a treat between her front paws until I tell her to "take it," but we haven't mastered setting the treat on her nose and having her wait to flip it into the air and catch it. She can actually sneak her tongue up and lick it off her own nose without moving her head . . . we gotta work on that.
In my case, it was more than just a dozen years. I spent 17 years with my beloved Bradley and therefore I have lots and lots of memories. Unfortunately, right now they're painful to recall. I'm told that that will change.
I find it interesting that you still miss your dear dog even after a year's time. That is indicative of the strength of the bond.
One wonders whether there can be a "Rainbow Bridge." I certainly hope that there is. Call me sentimental but sometimes it is the hope that one can be re-united in the hereafter that can keep us going.
I think that you are right to worry about your Mom. When her baby (and that's what some dogs and cats become, your baby) passes on, it is going to be devastating to her. It might even affect her health (God forbid!); I pray that it doesn't. She'll need some heavy-duty counseling to get her over her loss. The good thing is that she has had her darling dog to comfort her all this time. That, girlangler, as you well know, is a blessing all to itself.
And thank you for that last paragraph. Dogs and cats are little angels, given to us for a brief time, to comfort us, make us happy. They truly are God's gift and we should treat them that way.
Again, thanks for your post. I really appreciate it.
It does get better. I've lost special cats (Siamese all, the most doglike of the kitties) and I grieved for a long time. But now I remember them fondly and happily.
My poodle, Prissy, died in 2001. I said I grieved over her for a year, but I was referring to the serious grieving part, where my heart still ached very badly.
Now, five years later, I still dream about her often. And I am crying as I type this, so I guess I'll really never get over losing her, but I can talk about her now (most of the time) without crying.
Her quality of life was getting pretty bad in the end, and, although she would never let on, to keep from alarming me, I could tell she was starting to suffer.
I cherish every moment I had with her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.