Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Don Feder] The Da Vinci Code: Blasphemy Hits the Big Screen
Human Events ^ | May 19, 2006 | Don Feder

Posted on 05/19/2006 6:28:58 PM PDT by rhema

The Da Vinci Code -- which opens in the U.S. on May 19 -- might be subtitled "Religion for Morons" or "Gnosticism Meets The New Age."

It's fantasy posing as reality. The Sony Pictures film is blasphemous, defames the Catholic Church, and promotes neo-pagan Goddess worship.

I find it offensive, and I'm not even a Christian.

Director Ron Howard (who specializes in visual candy) assures us that Opie's opus will be true to the novel -- a pretentious, overwritten piece of trash that makes Bridget Jones's Diary look like one of the 100 Greatest Books Ever Written.

The plot of Dan Brown's mega-best seller (45 million copies sold) goes like this: Jesus married Mary Magdalene, who bore his children, who became the Merovingian monarchs of France, whose descendants are running around Europe today -- being chased by Opus Dei or Mormon missionaries or Martians or someone.

Again, according to The Code, The Catholic Church has for centuries concealed the truth about Jesus to maintain its power. Mary Magdalene represents the "sacred feminine" -- which supposedly predates monotheism -- and which wicked patriarchalists have spent millennia trying to suppress, the better to deny man's sexual nature and subjugate women.

The book (and presumably the film) even has a ritualistic orgy, where communicants dance with orbs and the grand master of the book's mysterious order gets frisky with a plump, middle-aged lady. The scene is described on page 311: "'The woman you behold is love!' The women called, raising their orbs again. The men responded, 'She has her dwelling place in eternity.'" (All I want is lovin' you, and music, music, music?)

Brown may have achieved the impossible -- devised a type of mumbo-jumbo that makes "healing" crystals seem serious.

Orthodox Christians are rightly offended by The Code's plot, denying as it does the divinity of Jesus and his mission.

People are free to believe, or not believe, in Jesus. Jews and Christians have been debating the identity of the Messiah, what God requires of us and how salvation may be achieved for almost 2,000 years. But to turn the life of a man almost a billion people on this planet worship into a soap opera beggars the term insensitive.

At least Christians can take comfort in the fact that their's isn't the only faith maligned and misrepresented by Brown's book.

On page 309, Brown writes of his protagonist: "Langdon's Jewish students always looked flabbergasted when he first told them that the early Jewish tradition involved ritualistic sex. In the Temple, no less. Early Jews believed that the Holy of Holies in Solomon's Temple housed not only God but also His powerful female equal, Shekinah. Men seeking spiritual wholeness came to the Temple to visit priestesses -- or hierodules -- with whom they made love and experienced the divine through physical union."

This would be amusing, were it not so disgusting. Jews daily pray for the rebuilding of the Holy Temple. For what -- so men can "experience the divine" by getting a little nookie?

In Judaism, "Shekinah" refers to the Divine presence, at one time said to reside at the Temple. Because the Hebrew word is feminine, in Brown’s fevered imagining, it has morphed into a female deity.

There were no "priestesses" in the Temple. The Torah condemns the ritual prostitution practiced by the Canaanites as "an abomination" -- its most severe censure.

It was Judaism that first related sexuality to morality. (Christian sexual ethics come from the Jewish Bible.) Where did Brown get his understanding of ancient Judaism -- from that noted Kabbalist, Madonna? Did he discover Jewish polytheism among the documents hidden away in the Templars’ secret crypt, along with Jesus’ marriage license?

In an article on nationalreview.com, David Klinghoffer argues that Jews also should be concerned about The Da Vinci Code because of its disturbing parallels to "The Protocols of The Elders of Zion."

"The Protocols," a forged document, postulates a conspiracy of Jewish leaders to conceal the truth about their alleged control of humanity through various political movements. The Da Vinci Code claims the Catholic Church is involved in a massive cover-up to hide the real history of Jesus, in order to maintain its control of the faithful. In both cases, the public is invited to scorn the sinister conspirators -- Jews or Catholics.

As a Goddess-worshipping, neo-pagan, Brown seeks to reverse the Bible's process of taming man's erotic nature (by channeling it to fidelity and family), once again divorcing the sexual from the spiritual -- freeing man's hedonistic urges from Judeo-Christian constraints. That Brown has so many admirers among Hollywood libertines is unsurprising.

But why all the fuss? After all, it’s only a movie, right?

The novelist/philosopher Ayn Rand was once asked why she primarily wrote fiction, instead of works of philosophy. Rand explained that it's far easier to convey ideas through fiction than non-fiction -- witness Dante's The Divine Comedy, witness Uncle Tom's Cabin, witness Ben-Hur, The Screwtape Letters and To Kill a Mockingbird.

Novels and films aren't footnoted. The author or screenwriter can create a thoroughly convincing universe that powerfully projects his message. From The Birth of a Nation and Triumph of The Will to Thelma and Louise and Brokeback Mountain, films have told us how to think about the world around us.

Most movies present the world according to Hollywood (and the word became flesh -- lots of flesh) -- that the sex act is good in and of itself, that people should follow their feelings (which invariably will lead them to right conduct and happiness), that prayer is like throwing a penny in a wishing well, that God is within us, that God is love, that God makes no demands of us and that the followers of traditional religion are a bunch of uptight, puritanical, hypocritical killjoys.

Debunking Christianity -- which is The Da Vinci Code's mission -- advances this worldview.

All too many people read novels or see films and think they're experiencing reality. Their understanding of the complicated history of settlers and Indians comes from Dances With Wolves. They are informed about the crusades by Kingdom of Heaven. Their understanding of the theory of global warming comes from The Day After Tomorrow.

According to a Barna Group survey, 24% of those who read The Da Vinci Code said it aided their "personal spiritual growth and understanding." In other words, one in four of its readers believe the book’s thesis (as opposed to its storyline) is true. Our "personal spiritual growth" isn't aided by what we believe to be a lie.

The best response to The Da Vinci Code -- besides derisive laughter -- is a boycott. Resist the urge to determine just how bad it is by buying a ticket. You'll only be rewarding the perpetrators -- perhaps encouraging The Da Vinci Code: Part II, wherein Dan Brown reveals that Jesus was really married to Lazarus.


TOPICS: Religion; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: davincicode; donfeder; moviereview
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

1 posted on 05/19/2006 6:28:59 PM PDT by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rhema
It's fantasy posing as reality

A good working definition of fiction. Good ole' Aristotle would call it Mimesis.
2 posted on 05/19/2006 6:31:22 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caleb1411; BibChr
Most movies present the world according to Hollywood (and the word became flesh -- lots of flesh) -- that the sex act is good in and of itself, that people should follow their feelings (which invariably will lead them to right conduct and happiness)

Well, Bill Clinton was paying rapt attention, anyway.

3 posted on 05/19/2006 6:32:26 PM PDT by rhema ("Break the conventions, keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Excellent review.


4 posted on 05/19/2006 6:34:40 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges
A good working definition of fiction. Good ole' Aristotle would call it Mimesis.

For this movie, I had a different noun in mind: soporific.

5 posted on 05/19/2006 6:34:50 PM PDT by rhema ("Break the conventions, keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rhema
The best response to The Da Vinci Code -- besides derisive laughter -- is a boycott.

I am a conservative, practicing Catholic, and my wife and I plan to see the movie this weekend. My brother is a conservative Catholic priest, and he looks forward to seeing it. I enjoy fiction, in books and movies. That's what this is, as well as good, old fashioned entertainment. I suggest you stop taking life so seriously. Relax, it's, A MOVIE!! Everyone, see this movie!! It should be as much fun as the book!

6 posted on 05/19/2006 6:36:06 PM PDT by ExtremeUnction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
Opie's Opus. Good one.
7 posted on 05/19/2006 6:36:52 PM PDT by satchmodog9 (Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
But why all the fuss? After all, it’s only a movie, right?

The novelist/philosopher Ayn Rand was once asked why she primarily wrote fiction, instead of works of philosophy. Rand explained that it's far easier to convey ideas through fiction than non-fiction -- witness Dante's The Divine Comedy, witness Uncle Tom's Cabin, witness Ben-Hur, The Screwtape Letters and To Kill a Mockingbird.

Novels and films aren't footnoted. The author or screenwriter can create a thoroughly convincing universe that powerfully projects his message. From The Birth of a Nation and Triumph of The Will to Thelma and Louise and Brokeback Mountain, films have told us how to think about the world around us.

This is for all of the "It's only Fiction, get over it!" crowd out there.

8 posted on 05/19/2006 6:36:53 PM PDT by frogjerk (LIBERALISM: The perpetual insulting of common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

I wouldn't doubt it. The aesthete in me is sort of pleased that a work of fiction, albeit one as trashy as this, is generating so much serious discussion about the effect that Art has on a culture. Maybe it will drive others to write their own pulp thrillers with a Biblical point of view. Something about the rapture perhaps and those who would be left behind...


9 posted on 05/19/2006 6:37:59 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ExtremeUnction

If you are a practicing Catholic, why would you go see a movie that blasphemes our Lord?


10 posted on 05/19/2006 6:38:26 PM PDT by frogjerk (LIBERALISM: The perpetual insulting of common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rhema

My wife bought me the Angels and Demons audiobook for a long trip. It was putrid.

I didn't get past page 86 of The Da Vinci Code.

No more Dan Brown for me!


11 posted on 05/19/2006 6:40:26 PM PDT by 2nd Bn, 11th Mar (The "P" in Democrat stands for patriotism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
This is for all of the "It's only Fiction, get over it!" crowd out there.

Yep. Thanks. I am taking my entire Catholic family. My kids loved the book. They know fact from fiction, at their young age. Apparently, some people never "get it."

12 posted on 05/19/2006 6:40:36 PM PDT by ExtremeUnction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rhema

ping


13 posted on 05/19/2006 6:42:07 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

ping


14 posted on 05/19/2006 6:42:08 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2nd Bn, 11th Mar

I glanced at The Da Vinci Code in a book store just to gauge the prose. I was duly confronted with setences like "She was so surprised that she made a call from her cellular phone." He's a terrible writer.


15 posted on 05/19/2006 6:42:18 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ExtremeUnction
I am a conservative, practicing Catholic, and my wife and I plan to see the movie this weekend. My brother is a conservative Catholic priest, and he looks forward to seeing it. I enjoy fiction, in books and movies. That's what this is, as well as good, old fashioned entertainment. I suggest you stop taking life so seriously. Relax, it's, A MOVIE!! Everyone, see this movie!! It should be as much fun as the book!

It's a turkey, actually, about 80 percent of whose reviews are redolent with adjectives like "ponderous, pompous, tendentious, laughable." Even the liberal Minneapolis Star Tribune critic panned it.

I do enjoy life so much that I'll probably see a film I can giggle about this weekend: Over the Hedge. Its lack of pretension will make it far more palatable than a snore-fest like Da Vinci Code.

16 posted on 05/19/2006 6:44:43 PM PDT by rhema ("Break the conventions, keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
If you are a practicing Catholic, why would you go see a movie that blasphemes our Lord?

Because I do not think that it blasphemes our Lord. That's it! Because you are so upset, I now plan to take my family and my kids, AND THEIR FRIENDS to the movie. All Catholic school kids. All exposed to the movie. THE HORROR!!

17 posted on 05/19/2006 6:44:57 PM PDT by ExtremeUnction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Oh geez, not this nonsense again....

Hey, I've got two words that will make Feder's head spin around...

HARRY POTTER


18 posted on 05/19/2006 6:46:12 PM PDT by Lord_Baltar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Thank you for posting that. I haven't read anything by Don Feder for far too long a time, and that was excellent. His assessment of "The Code" as a terrible piece of literature was spot on, but I particularly loved this line:
"This would be amusing, were it not so disgusting. Jews daily pray for the rebuilding of the Holy Temple. For what -- so men can "experience the divine" by getting a little nookie?"


19 posted on 05/19/2006 6:46:52 PM PDT by Robwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges
I glanced at The Da Vinci Code in a book store just to gauge the prose. I was duly confronted with setences like "She was so surprised that she made a call from her cellular phone."

Dante and Milton, move over.

20 posted on 05/19/2006 6:47:45 PM PDT by rhema ("Break the conventions, keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson