Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North American Union Already Starting to Replace USA
HumanEventsOnline ^ | May 30, 2006 | Jerome R. Corsi

Posted on 05/30/2006 10:01:14 AM PDT by NapkinUser

In March 2005 at their summit meeting in Waco, Tex., President Bush, President Fox and Prime Minister Martin issued a joint statement announced the creation of the “Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America” (SPP). The creation of this new agreement was never submitted to Congress for debate and decision. Instead, the U.S. Department of Commerce merely created a new division under the same title to implement working groups to advance a North American Union working agenda in a wide range of areas, including: manufactured goods, movement of goods, energy, environment, e-commerce, financial services, business facilitation, food and agriculture, transportation, and health.

SPP is headed by three top cabinet level officers of each country. Representing the United States are Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez, Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff, and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. Representing Mexico are Secretario de Econom�Fernando Canales, Secretario de Gobernaci󮠃arlos Abascal, and Secretario de Relaciones Exteriores, Luis Ernesto Derbéz. Representing Canada are Minister of Industry David L. Emerson, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety, Anne McLellan, and Minister of Foreign Affairs Pierre Stewart Pettigrew.

Reporting in June 2005 to the heads of state of the three countries, the trilateral SPP emphasized the extensive working group structure that had been established to pursue an ambitious agenda:

In carrying out your instructions, we established working groups under both agendas of the Partnership – Security and Prosperity. We held roundtables with stakeholders, meetings with business groups and briefing sessions with Legislatures, as well as with other relevant political jurisdictions. The result is a detailed series of actions and recommendations designed to increase the competitiveness of North America and the security of our people.

This is not a theoretical exercise being prepared so it can be submitted for review. Instead, SPP is producing an action agreement to be implemented directly by regulations, without any envisioned direct Congressional oversight.

Upon your review and approval, we will once again meet with stakeholders and work with them to implement the workplans that we have developed.

And again, the June 2005 SPP report stresses:

The success of our efforts will be defined less by the contents of the work plans than by the actual implementation of initiatives and strategies that will make North America more prosperous and more secure.

Reviewing the specific working agenda initiatives, the goal to implement directly is apparent. Nearly every work plan is characterized by action steps described variously as “our three countries signed a Framework of Common Principles …” or “we have signed a Memorandum of Understanding …,” or “we have signed a declaration of intent …” etc. Once again, none of the 30 or so working agendas makes any mention of submitting decisions to the U.S. Congress for review and approval. No new U.S. laws are contemplated for the Bush administration to submit to Congress. Instead, the plan is obviously to knit together the North American Union completely under the radar, through a process of regulations and directives issued by various U.S. government agencies.

What we have here is an executive branch plan being implemented by the Bush administration to construct a new super-regional structure completely by fiat. Yet, we can find no single speech in which President Bush has ever openly expressed to the American people his intention to create a North American Union by evolving NAFTA into this NAFTA-Plus as a first, implementing step.

Anyone who has wondered why President Bush has not bothered to secure our borders is advised to spend some time examining the SPP working groups’ agenda. In every area of activity, the SPP agenda stresses free and open movement of people, trade, and capital within the North American Union. Once the SPP agenda is implemented with appropriate departmental regulations, there will be no area of immigration policy, trade rules, environmental regulations, capital flows, public health, plus dozens of other key policy areas countries that the U.S. government will be able to decide alone, or without first consulting with some appropriate North American Union regulatory body. At best, our border with Mexico will become a speed bump, largely erased, with little remaining to restrict the essentially free movement of people, trade, and capital.

Canada has established an SPP working group within their Foreign Affairs department. Mexico has placed the SPP within the office of the Secretaria de Economia and created and extensive website for the Alianza Para La Securidad y La Prosperidad de Améica del Norte (ASPAN). On this Mexican website, ASPAN is described as “a permanent, tri-lateral process to create a major integration of North America.”

The extensive working group activity being implemented right now by the government of Mexico, Canada, and the United States is consistent with the blueprint laid out in the May 2005 report of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), titled “Building a North American Community.”

The Task Force’s central recommendation is the establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community, the boundaries of which would be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter. (page xvii)

The only borders or tariffs which would remain would be those around the continent, not those between the countries within:

Its (the North American Community’s) boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly, and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America. (page 3)

What will happen to the sovereignty of the United States? The model is the European Community. While the United States would supposedly remain as a country, many of our nation-state prerogatives would ultimately be superseded by the authority of a North American court and parliamentary body, just as the U.S. dollar would have to be surrendered for the “Amero,” the envisioned surviving currency of the North American Union. The CFR report left no doubt that the North American Union was intended to evolve through a series of regulatory decisions:

While each country must retain its right to impose and maintain unique regulations consonant with its national priorities and income level, the three countries should make a concerted effort to encourage regulatory convergence.

The three leaders highlighted the importance of addressing this issue at their March 2005 summit in Texas. The Security and Prosperity Partnership for North America they signed recognizes the need for a stronger focus on building the economic strength of the continent in addition to ensuring its security. To this end, it emphasizes regulatory issues. Officials in all three countries have formed a series of working groups under designated lead cabinet ministers. These working groups have been ordered to produce an action plan for approval by the leaders within ninety days, by late June 2005, and to report regularly thereafter. (pages 23-24)

Again, the CFR report says nothing about reporting to Congress or to the American people. What we have underway here with the SPP could arguably be termed a bureaucratic coup d’etat. If that is not the intent, then President Bush should rein in the bureaucracy until the American people have been fully informed of the true nature of our government’s desire to create a North American Union. Otherwise, the North American Union will become a reality in 2010 as planned. Right now, the only check or balance being exercised is arguably Congressional oversight of the executive bureaucracy, even though Congress itself might not fully appreciate what is happening.

Mr. Corsi is the author of several books, including "Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry" (along with John O'Neill), "Black Gold Stranglehold: The Myth of Scarcity and the Politics of Oil" (along with Craig R. Smith), and "Atomic Iran: How the Terrorist Regime Bought the Bomb and American Politicians." He is a frequent guest on the G. Gordon Liddy radio show. He will soon co-author a new book with Jim Gilchrist on the Minuteman Project.


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: aspan; bloodinthestreets; bushtreason; cfr; chickenlittle; corsi; crapola; cuespookymusic; doomedweredoomed; freetrade; jumptheshark; mexico; morethorazineplease; nafta; northamerica; northamericanunion; propaganda; spp; theboogeyman; theskyisfalling; tinfoil; trade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 351-385 next last

1 posted on 05/30/2006 10:01:18 AM PDT by NapkinUser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

BFL


2 posted on 05/30/2006 10:03:22 AM PDT by mnehring (Those who advocate, and act to promote, victory by Democrats are not conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

George Bush: first President of North America.


3 posted on 05/30/2006 10:03:45 AM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: NapkinUser

We can't even keep the 50 states from slitting each others throats. I can't imagine that a North American union would stand much chance of success.


6 posted on 05/30/2006 10:17:18 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I mean the filth in the administration and the senate that support this crap.

I doubt that the illegals want us to revolt, it would get very, very bad for them very, very quickly.


7 posted on 05/30/2006 10:18:11 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

"George Bush: first President of North America."




If you can popularize the notion that George W. Bush is the inevitable first President of the North American Union, then you can be certain that it will never happen.


8 posted on 05/30/2006 10:19:12 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
We can't even keep the 50 states from slitting each others throats. I can't imagine that a North American union would stand much chance of success.

It's absurd with two diametrically opposed economic nations such as the U.S. and third world Mexico.

It might work, economically, between say Canada and the U.S., but this would be like trying to throw Sudan and Somalia into the mix of the European Union.

GEE! I wonder what the logicial conclusion would be there, ... Hmmmm...

This is surreal!

9 posted on 05/30/2006 10:21:20 AM PDT by Fruitbat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

As well, will the 50 states stick together should this really begin taking on reality?


10 posted on 05/30/2006 10:22:24 AM PDT by Fruitbat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

My God. It's about time somebody writes about this. I've been posting links to this for months now.


11 posted on 05/30/2006 10:23:20 AM PDT by Sweetjustusnow (Mr. President and Representatives, do your duty to uphold our laws or you are all gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

The title may be granted by history, or presently by whatever secret societies are pushing the agenda. (Don't bother with the straight-jacket, I can slip right out of them...)


12 posted on 05/30/2006 10:25:30 AM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1594084/posts

George Washington - The First President.

Abraham Lincoln - The First Yankee President.

Jimmy Carter - The First Muslim President.

Ronald Reagan - The Last American President.

George HW Bush - The First 'New World Order' President.

Bill Clinton - The First Black President.

George W. Bush - The First Globalist President.


13 posted on 05/30/2006 10:25:38 AM PDT by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sweetjustusnow

Here's the bones of the sweet heart deal.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/03/print/20050323-1.html


14 posted on 05/30/2006 10:26:27 AM PDT by tertiary01 (Obsessive Compulsive Thread Nannyism. I hope I don't catch it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

LoL since when is shooting off the mouth equal an "armed revolt".

This is sooo secret that only millions of people know about it.


15 posted on 05/30/2006 10:29:53 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

bump and save


16 posted on 05/30/2006 10:31:06 AM PDT by krunkygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

My shampoo bottles have been printed in French (Canadian), spanish and English for 10 years now.


17 posted on 05/30/2006 10:32:15 AM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tertiary01

http://www.cfr.org/publication/7912/creating_a_north_american_community_chairmens_statement.html?breadcrumb=default

http://www.oas.org/main/main.asp?sLang=E&sLink=http://www.oas.org/OASpage/press_releases/home_eng/press.asp


18 posted on 05/30/2006 10:33:50 AM PDT by Sweetjustusnow (Mr. President and Representatives, do your duty to uphold our laws or you are all gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing
Oh, this conspiracy goes back far before NAFTA. There is another organization that has has worked towards unifying the military functions of our continent for decades.


19 posted on 05/30/2006 10:35:31 AM PDT by mnehring (Those who advocate, and act to promote, victory by Democrats are not conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: fishtank
John Hanson - The First President of the United States.

George Washington - The First Constitutional President.

Abraham Lincoln - The First Yankee President.

Jimmy Carter - The First Muslim President.

Ronald Reagan - The Last American President.

George HW Bush - The First 'New World Order' President.

Bill Clinton - The First Black President.

George W. Bush - The First Globalist President.

20 posted on 05/30/2006 10:37:13 AM PDT by ASA Vet (Those who know don't talk. Those who talk don't know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: All
In Quebec, the Amereaux?
21 posted on 05/30/2006 10:39:47 AM PDT by BOATSNM8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit

Millions know about this crap, thanks to the WWW. Without it the MSM would be saving it as a SUPRISE! SUPRISE! SUPRISE!


22 posted on 05/30/2006 10:45:58 AM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (Dear US Senators, Reps. and Mr. President: Why are y'all abetting the destruction of our culture?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
[ In March 2005 at their summit meeting in Waco, Tex., President Bush, President Fox and Prime Minister Martin issued a joint statement announced the creation of the “Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America” (SPP). ]

The Coup D'etat.. is alive and well.. progressing as planned..
Is it TREASON?... How can 20 plus million brand new democrats be a GOOD THING?.. -OR- are "they" the gambit that forces the Coup D'etat?..

If you do not know, you had better find out.. Because the voting demographics in the United States are changing massivly DAILY.. And many many Americans are bleating like sheep un nerved by all the wolves howling..

The Coup D'etat is well on its way.. The "Chief" with the most "coup"(feathers) is George Bush.. Lovely headdress he has but his dance is for the demise of the United States.. (as we have known it)..

And the republican Congress is being run by Custer..

23 posted on 05/30/2006 10:49:01 AM PDT by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Heh. Maybe.


Off-topic, but I have seen the political model you have in your profile. Notice that "very republican" makes one a fascist, but "very socialist" is not assigned any proper label. In other words, "communist" does not appear anywhere on the chart. (And it goes without saying that the nazis were socialists, so whole chart is BS really.)


24 posted on 05/30/2006 10:49:05 AM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
I don't believe it.

If it has funding then it is subject to congressional oversight.

If it is a treaty it will been to to be ratified.

The President is empowered to negotiate with foreign governments but implementing policy requires congress.

Not to mention security cooperation is a good idea - if we can stop cocaine, heroin and terrorists from getting onto North America in the first place this would be a good thing.

Now, it looks like Mexico is about to elect leftists with support from Chavez and Fidel - if that happens we may have to go unilateral but as long as they have a semi-rational government it makes sense to talk and work together where its in our best interest.
25 posted on 05/30/2006 10:53:13 AM PDT by gondramB (He who angers you, in part, controls you. But he may not enjoy what the rest of you does about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

Yeah right.


26 posted on 05/30/2006 10:54:38 AM PDT by NapkinUser (Why isn't there a 'virtual fence' around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing
I actually agree with you on that chart. It falls under the same fallacy that Fascism is 'Right Wing', albeit, it was only Right Wing in relation to the Marxist governments it sprung up around- but in relation to a capitalist society, it is very Left Wing.

As Ayn Rand put it (paraphrased)- Fascists are the same as Communists, they are all about collectivism, they just have better uniforms.
27 posted on 05/30/2006 10:57:52 AM PDT by mnehring (Those who advocate, and act to promote, victory by Democrats are not conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
The thing is the only different between Fascists and Communists is there both forced collectivism.. but one a nationalist and one internationalist

I have not problem with some bunch of people willing going off in to there little corner of the world and forming a collective

collectivism is like Sex there "love" and "rape"... it's do you want to freely "give it up" to whoever vs forcing some one to "give it up" ...Fascists, Communists both practice Rapist collectivism...

the other aspect that makes it akin to Rape is it really all about having power and control over others and the extent of the brutality they will go to

28 posted on 05/30/2006 11:46:06 AM PDT by tophat9000 (If it was illegal French Canadians would La Raza back them? Racist back there race over country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

HELLO, SHEISSEKOPF!

Pussy Martin hasn't been the PM here since the January 2006 election.

Take a look at what our genuinely Conservative PM has done so far with a decidedly MINORITY government, and then post something relevant.

DUMBKOPF.


29 posted on 05/30/2006 12:59:14 PM PDT by Don W (Stoneage man survived thousands of years of bitter-cold ice. Modern man WILLsurvive global warming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
The only borders or tariffs which would remain would be those around the continent, not those between the countries within.

The ballot box will decide that, A$$holes!

30 posted on 05/30/2006 1:32:46 PM PDT by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser; All

Big 1100-post thread on this topic over the Memorial Day weekend with tons of research and links. Go here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1634942/posts

Also, please note that on August 25, 2000 Bush gave what's known as his Century of the Americas speech. Before we elected him the first time, he told us what he wanted. An alliance of all the Americas. Here it is.

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a39a6ee1f3ae7.htm


31 posted on 05/30/2006 1:47:16 PM PDT by Veto! (Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

George W. Bush is the inevitable first President of the North American Union

Jeb Bush President of the member state America in 2010.

A man with a plan.


32 posted on 05/30/2006 1:47:26 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Abram; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Allosaurs_r_us; Americanwolf; Americanwolfsbrother; Annie03; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
33 posted on 05/30/2006 1:48:47 PM PDT by freepatriot32 (Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
The ballot box will decide that

ONLY if we can keep the elections fair and fraud free with accurate ballot counts and no 'lost' ballot boxes.
34 posted on 05/30/2006 1:49:31 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

bump


35 posted on 05/30/2006 1:55:33 PM PDT by Dark Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: c-b 1

Uh oh looks like the news is out. I won't hold my breath though.AWB


36 posted on 05/30/2006 2:03:53 PM PDT by Americanwolfsbrother (Minutemen - Building the fence YOUR government refuses to build.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

Poppa bush has a hispanic grandson that will assume the throne when the time is right.


37 posted on 05/30/2006 2:13:10 PM PDT by winodog (Its the constitution, dummy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

This has already been posted infinity times.

Please use the search function in the future. :D


38 posted on 05/30/2006 2:32:56 PM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XIII; NapkinUser

Nope, only once. Possibly you are confused with this one?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1634942/posts


39 posted on 05/30/2006 3:09:50 PM PDT by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XIII; NapkinUser
This has already been posted infinity times. Please use the search function in the future. :D

Infinity times? Really? Since it was only published today, that seems hard to believe.

Search... nope. Nothing there. Only this article.

Corsi wrote two other different but related articles in the past week. Perhaps you are thinking of one of those?

40 posted on 05/30/2006 3:14:08 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

The thing we ought to be doing is voting out anyone in Congress, Republican or Democrat, who is a CFR member. There are a bunch of them. It only took 14 senators to kill the whole filibuster confrontation. Instead of having the gonads to take it to a vote, they weaseled out. These CFR elites need to be stripped of their power by the people. It doesn't take a majority of them to control Congress. It takes just enough of them to keep a majority from happening.

As far as presidents go, Bush (41), Clinton, Carter, and Nixon were all CFR members or members of the Trilateral Commission. If you want to know why it doesn't make a difference if the Dems or Republicans are in power, there's your answer right there. It totally "creeped me out" to watch the 2000 election get argued all the way to the Supreme Court with CFR/Trilateralists James Baker and Warren Christopher representing the sides.


41 posted on 05/30/2006 3:24:27 PM PDT by gregwest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
This isn't rocket science- Follow the money and you'll find the truth

Bump! So true.

42 posted on 05/30/2006 3:24:45 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

whoops, maybe!


43 posted on 05/30/2006 5:36:59 PM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl; jeffersonschild

Thanks for the ping, calcowgirl. Jeffersonschild, you'll be interested in this article, too.

I just happened to read through the document to which he refers earlier today. He's right, there's absolutely nothing in it which states any of this is a recommendation, or conditioned upon approval by the representatives and senators of the American people. It only refers to "stakeholders", business interests and other elite politicos.


44 posted on 05/30/2006 6:29:29 PM PDT by nicmarlo (Bush is the Best President Ever. Rah. Rah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Czar; Borax Queen; janetgreen; Smartass; JustPiper; La Enchiladita; DumpsterDiver

ping; another corsi article.


45 posted on 05/30/2006 6:31:05 PM PDT by nicmarlo (Bush is the Best President Ever. Rah. Rah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

Thank you.


46 posted on 05/30/2006 7:21:57 PM PDT by Borax Queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Borax Queen

yw


47 posted on 05/30/2006 7:31:14 PM PDT by nicmarlo (Bush is the Best President Ever. Rah. Rah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Fruitbat

"It's absurd with two diametrically opposed economic nations such as the U.S. and third world Mexico."

It's very simple, thru massive mexican imigration Bush eliminates the American middle class and lowers the standard of living to that of Mexico and the mexicans do the same to Canada and when everyone is equal it happens very easily.

Read the last part of NAFTA, it's spelled out.


48 posted on 05/30/2006 7:37:11 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

You're right, that's exactly where this is headed.


49 posted on 05/30/2006 7:40:19 PM PDT by Fruitbat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

BTW, which part specifically?


50 posted on 05/30/2006 7:45:47 PM PDT by Fruitbat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 351-385 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson