Skip to comments.U.S.-Mexico merger opposition intensifies
Posted on 07/10/2006 5:51:15 AM PDT by brain bleeds red
WASHINGTON Are secret meetings being held between the corporate and political elites of the U.S., Mexico and Canada to push North America into a European Union-style merger?
Is President Bush's reluctance to control the border and enforce laws requiring deportation of foreigners who enter the country illegally part of a master plan to all but eliminate borders between the U.S., Canada and Mexico?
Does the agenda of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America include a common currency that would scrap the dollar in favor of what some are calling the "amero"?
It may be the biggest story of the 21st century, but few press outlets are telling it. In fact, until very recently, few in the U.S. were aware of the plans and even fewer denouncing what appears to be the implementation of an effort some have characterized as "NAFTA on steroids."
But opposition is mounting.
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...
If the proposed US/Mexican merger was true....
The entire illegal invader movement is a part and parcel of a monstrous scheme against the sovereignty of the United States and it has more to do with our downfall than with an EU-type cabal.
The accommodators, unfortunately, include most of those who are supposedly serving us in the present and past governments.
Communists flourish within our borders (along with the islamic killers) and they're leading the Aztlan movement, using the castoffs invading us to accomplish their goal.
Aztlan is the subversive group using immigration to break away the Southwest from the United States to destroy us.
Their goal: divide and conquer, in the name of international socialism/communism.
When one considers that California, the sixth largest economy in the world, being joined to Arizona, Utah, Colorado, New Mexico and Texas the puzzle becomes complete and the realization finally sinks in that losing control of this vast area leads directly to the destruction of America.
Our government encourages the invasion of our country and the Aztlan treachery. This scheme is so obvious it has to be by design. To attempt explanation of our government leaders' complicity defies all logic.
Americans who truly care about their destiny and that of our nation need to be aware and to resist this insipid attack on our nation's sovereignty in every way possible.
It is possible to deport and to completely discourage this invasion of the U. S. A. by the dregs of Mexican and South American society. Many of these commit the sexual crimes, the murders, the stealing and the waste of whatever resources cities and states have.
Get them out the way we hunt down murderers and other assorted criminals: one at a time if necessary!
Is this a joke?
I'm serious, because if it's not ..... this is just craziness.
Be prepared. The cleanup crew will be here in a few minutes to call this all lies and to call you stupid. I don't know who or what to believe when it comes to this topic. WND is a dubious source. Something deep down inside of me tells me this is true or in the works.
Beware of the stonecutters!!!!!
We live on a continent whose three countries possess the assets to make it the strongest, most prosperous and self-sufficient area on Earth. Within the borders of this North American continent are the food, resources, technology and undeveloped territory which, properly managed, could dramatically improve the quality of life of all its inhabitants.
It is no accident that this unmatched potential for progress and prosperity exists in three countries with such long-standing heritages of free government. A developing closeness among Canada, Mexico and the United States--a North American accord--would permit achievement of that potential in each country beyond that which I believe any of them--strong as they are--could accomplish in the absence of such cooperation. In fact, the key to our own future security may lie in both Mexico and Canada becoming much stronger countries than they are today.
No one can say at this point precisely what form future cooperation among our three countries will take. But if I am elected President, I would be willing to invite each of our neighbors to send a special representative to our government to sit in on high level planning sessions with us, as partners, mutually concerned about the future of our continent. First, I would immediately seek the views and ideas of Canadian and Mexican leaders on this issue, and work tirelessly with them to develop closer ties among our peoples. It is time we stopped thinking of our nearest neighbors as foreigners.
Ronald Reagan, November 13, 1979.
WND can be dubious sometimes, yes, but read the whole article. There are some undeniable facts here. Mods, please don't move this before reading it.
that american elites would even consider was is obviously a bad deal for americans really hurts.
Specifically which ones?
It is most certainly true. The pro-illegal people are not fighting for the illegals to have citizenship. This is the biggest line of bull propoganda that they feed us. They want open borders so we can have a North American Union. I've heard it in interviews on Fox News, they're not shy about it. Our politicans on the other hand, knowing how much being a citizens means to us, uses the "We are such a great nation, they want to be citizens and enjoy our freedoms", to try and tug at our heartstrings. They've overstepped this time. We have been asleep at the wheel, we've relinquished OUR goverment to the elites, they think they are so powerful that they're calling the shots and us citizens be damned. We have the power to take our country back from these morons, the first thing we have to do is literally clean house. We've let the special interest groups control what goes on but Joe Sixpack holds all of the cards if he opens his eyes and votes.
Are you part of the 'clean-up' crew we were warned about?
I don't need WND to convince me. I've read, seen and heard enough to believe it all on my own. The problem, as I see it, is not so much whether others believe it or not but, rather, whether they actually support it or not. Incredible. To me, supporting such an idea is treason and nothing less.
Can anyone tell me why this was moved to General/Chat? This happened last week, and I don't understand why this isn't a story that deserves News status as it is most definitely current as we attempt to deal with open borders and illegal aliens.
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
This is no joke. The original article has many links to tie everything together.
Bush Administration Erases U.S. Borders With Mexico and Canada
HumanEventsOnline ^ | 06/28/2006 | Jerome R. Corsi
Posted on 06/29/2006 6:06:13 AM PDT by NapkinUser
The Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), signed by President Bush with Mexico and Canada in Waco, Tex., on March 23, 2005, was fundamentally an agreement to erase our borders with Mexico and Canada.
As I have documented below, the SPP working groups organized within the U.S. Department of Transportation are signing trilateral memoranda of understanding and other agreements with Mexico and Canada designed to accomplish the open borders goal incrementally, below the radar of mainstream media attention, thereby avoiding public scrutiny. Congress is largely unaware that SPP exists, let alone knowledgeable about the extensive work being done behind the scenes by the executive branch to advance the agenda articulated by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) to establish a North American Union as a new regional super-government by 2010.
The June 2005 Report to Leaders references that the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America was announced at the Waco summit in March 2005. Yet, the SPP declaration was neither a treaty nor a law. The legal status of the declaration was not much more than a press release issued by President Bush, President Vicente Fox, and then-Prime Minister of Canada Paul Martin. Still, somehow SPP.gov conveys the impression that the Waco declaration created de facto a new NAFTA-plus legal status between the three countries that is designated the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, or SPP for short.
Evidently using this quasi-press release as legal justification, the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC) has proceeded to organize extensive working groups, drawing freely from the executive branch. These SPP working groups are housed under the auspices of the SPP program in the NAFTA office, as directed by Geri Word, a DOC administrator. The June 2005 SPP Report to Leaders makes clear the extensive implementing work already undertaken:
In carrying out your instructions, we established working groups under both agendas of the Partnership -- Security and Prosperity. We held roundtables with stakeholders, meetings with business groups and briefing sessions with legislatures, as well as with other relevant political jurisdictions. The result is a series of detailed actions and recommendations designed to increase the competitiveness of North America and the security of our people.
Ms. Word confirmed by telephone that the membership of these working groups had not been published, not even on the Internet. Neither have minutes or transcripts of the many meetings with stakeholders and others been published, nor the actions and recommendations of the working groups. This revelation prompted a Freedom of Information Act request designed to bring these materials into the light of congressional public scrutiny. I also cannot find U.S. congressmen or senators who will identify any specific congressional examination or oversight that have been exercised over these SPP working groups that apparently have been convened to implement what amounts to only a joint press release declared from the trilateral summit in Waco.
Also found in the June 2005 Report to Leaders is that that the SPP working groups organized in DOC are reporting to three U.S. cabinet secretaries: Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez, Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff, and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. Comparable cabinet-level working groups are referenced to government websites in Canada and in Mexico.
More than 20 working groups are identified in the June 2005 Report to Leaders and decisions have been made to open U.S. borders and skies to virtually unlimited migration and trade from Canada and Mexico.
Regarding open skies, three working groups are working on aviation issues, groups designated as Aviation Safety, Airspace Capacity, and Harmonized Air Navigation Systems. I am told that a tri-lateral agreement to create a North American Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) was signed in 2005, and that five WAAS stations were planned to be put in place in Canada and Mexico in 2005. Implementing WAAS in Mexico and Canada involved sharing the U.S. Global Positioning System with Mexico and Canada. I am told that the three countries executed a Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum (RVSM) agreement in January 2005 to allow for Mexican and Canadian aircraft to confirm to U.S. air spacing requirements. I found that the three countries released a North American Aviation on a Joint Strategy for the implementation of performance-based navigation in North America. This initiative included Area Navigation (RNAV) and Required Navigation Performance (RNP) in North America.
None of the referenced agreements are found on the SPP website. Yet, the working groups on aviation appear to have already accomplished opening U.S. skies to free and unrestricted navigation by Mexican and Canadian aircraft. It could be concluded that aviation authorities in Mexico and Canada have been given the tools to identify the location of all aircraft flying over the United States at any time, including military aircraft. I found no discussion on the SPP website that establishes the SPP aviation working groups were acting within specific authority granted by Congress, or even that the SPP aviation working groups were reporting to Congress.
Later in the June 2005 Report to Leaders I found that SPP working groups have already established a trusted traveler program for North America, including procedures to enhance the use of biometrics in screening travelers destined to North America with a view to developing compatible biometric border and immigration systems. Moreover, a single, integrated global enrollment program for North American trusted travelers would be implemented within the next 36 months.
These descriptions suggest that all trusted citizens of the U.S., Mexico and Canada would be considered trusted citizens of North America, issued the type of biometric identification that would make crossing the border as simple as passing your credit card through a charge-out terminal at a retail store. Once these procedures are fully in place, the SPP working groups will have eliminated illegal immigration for the most part. By definition, all trusted travelers in the three countries would be permitted to migrate, and supposedly to work, wherever in North America they choose to be. Again, there is no SPP reference to congressional authorizing legislation or oversight.
In reference to commercial truck traffic in North America, the June 2005 Report to Leaders notes that FAST lanes are being developed at North American ports of entry such that within 12 months trusted trade commercial trucks with SENTRI electronic identification will be permitted rapid entrance into the United States. This will allow Mexican trucks carrying containers from China off-loaded in Mexican ports such as Lazaro Cardenas to pass through the border at Laredo, Tex., as fast as a U.S. car today equipped with an E-Z Pass zips through toll stops on U.S. limited access highways. Again, there is no SPP reference to Congress.
SPP working group executive branch activity expands over every facet of commerce, trade, environment, and health imaginable -- ranging from e-commerce, to a fully integrated auto sector, to North American harmonized energy and steel policies, to clean air, a reliable food supply, and a healthier North America. Throughout the document there are references to North America as the province for the ultimate planning and regulations, always with an assumption that the current disparate regulations of the United States, Mexico and Canada will be harmonized or integrated into a trilateral structure of common and compatible regulations.
None of the many memoranda of understanding, trilateral agreements, or other accords to which the June 2005 report refers are printed in the report or listed through links to Internet addresses where the relevant compacts can be reviewed.
What the SPP June 2005 Report to Leaders documents is the knitting together of a new regional super-government, the North American Union, being accomplished in executive branch closed committees whose membership remain unnamed. The United States has never experienced a coup detat, let alone a coup detat pulled off by the executive branch under cover of working groups. Yet, what has been described in the June 2005 SPP Report to Leaders demands being scrutinized to see if that charge is here supportable.
I have filed a FOIA request to get the information needed to determine exactly what is going on within the Bush Administration's SPP policy. Is the United States being replaced by a North American Union? This is a question Congress should also demand be answered. Why arent congressional hearings being scheduled?
If the plan is to evolve the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America into a new regional North American Union super-government through executive action, the American people have a Constitutional right to know the truth. Is what is going on within SPP.gov is in accordance with the U.S. Constitution definition of executive branch rights and responsibilities, or not?
President Bush needs to come forward and explain SPP to the American people, explicitly and directly, and he needs to do so soon.
Mr. Corsi is the author of several books, including "Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry" (along with John O'Neill), "Black Gold Stranglehold: The Myth of Scarcity and the Politics of Oil" (along with Craig R. Smith), and "Atomic Iran: How the Terrorist Regime Bought the Bomb and American Politicians." He is a frequent guest on the G. Gordon Liddy radio show. He will soon co-author a new book with Jim Gilchrist on the Minuteman Project.