Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2 Durham officers charged with assault (Another DukeLax Coverup)
Durham HeraldSun ^ | July 28, 2006 | Ray Gronberg

Posted on 07/28/2006 4:52:22 AM PDT by abb

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 401-420 next last
To: pepperhead

There ain't enough money on Earth.


121 posted on 07/28/2006 11:34:53 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights
Has anyone seen that stripper Precious. Shes a wack job! Don't tip her, she'll stalk you

Well we do know the FA is crazy as a bat......

122 posted on 07/28/2006 11:36:48 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights
"The phrase I would do her with my worst enemies ____" comes to mind.
123 posted on 07/28/2006 11:38:25 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: pepperhead

Re: Cabbie Shot in Durham

YES.

I'm not saying it's connected. Not at all, HOWEVER, I'm saying the crazy, unbelievable things that have happened in this case, have made almost everything believable in Durham!

As we get farther away from the night of the party, the discussion slows, and the shock has worn off.

When you insert another person and place and consider the treatment of these LAX players - it illustrates how egregiously they've been treated.

If I fashioned a false news report and one read that Sgt Gottlieb has been banned charged with assault and he has been BANNED from Raleigh. One would think how harsh and unusual of a sentence to impose.

There wasn't much of that reaction to Finnerty in Georgetown. People are expecting this kids to get screwed at this point. IMO, it has, in large part, become the status-quo.


124 posted on 07/28/2006 11:42:01 PM PDT by Mike Nifong (Somebody Stop Me !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: pepperhead

would = wouldn't


125 posted on 07/28/2006 11:51:49 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: All; abb; Protect the Bill of Rights; JLS; Ken H

. . . . . . . . . . IS NIFONG SPEAKING IN CODE HERE?

I think Nifong is speaking in code here, when he says, (the LAX Gang-rape) "demands a Durham solution."

"A Durham Solution." More race baiting? Justice is Justice, no matter the address, but Nifong has other ideas.

Cheek says he never had the conversation that Nifong describes in his press conference on Friday.

In multiple ways, Cheek implies that Nifong's statements don't even make sense.
http://www.heraldsun.com/durham/4-756712.html

One more person calling in question Nifong's truthfulness.


126 posted on 07/28/2006 11:54:18 PM PDT by Mike Nifong (Somebody Stop Me !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Mike Nifong
One more person calling in question Nifong's truthfulness.

But yet he will not run against him............

127 posted on 07/29/2006 12:05:55 AM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: pepperhead

Yes, but, Nifong is continuing the same charade that he is this caring compassionate man and that his valiant fight for justice is being done at the risk of his personal interests.

He chose the case BECAUSE of his personal interests. He secured the indictments BEFORE the election and used a fixed ID lineup to get them in time for the election.

Now, Nifong is basically telling the public in an offical press conference that he was approached by 2 influential people and they advised him to Drop the Case or he would suffer personally - AND the NIFONG stood up against such back door dealing and did what was right and just for the world !

If you eliminate Cheek from the equation and just listen to what Nifong says about himself - he's saying that he has done all this in the name of Justice and he has suffered personally for his good deeds. He is saying that he will continue to ignore the personal consequences to him (he's not a politician, according to him) and go full steam ahead in the pursuit of a "Durham Solution".


128 posted on 07/29/2006 12:26:56 AM PDT by Mike Nifong (Somebody Stop Me !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: All

* * * * * CLUES TO THE MOTIVATION OF THE INVESTIGATION? * *

"Durham Police Chief Steve Chalmers said the incident allegedly involving officers Gary Lee and Scott Tanner would have NO EFFECT on his department's LACROSSE rape investigation. Neither of them is working on the Duke investigation.

"As far as I'm concerned, they're two totally different areas of concern, and WE'RE NOT TYING ONE TO THE OTHER," Chalmers said Thursday."

http://rdu.news14.com/content/top_stories/?ArID=88321&SecID=1


"WE'RE NOT TYING ONE TO THE OTHER,"

Sounds like the goal of the entire investigation


129 posted on 07/29/2006 12:36:40 AM PDT by Mike Nifong (Somebody Stop Me !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Mike Nifong

This morning's stories...

Nifong says some criticism justified
http://www.heraldsun.com/durham/4-756712.html

Nifong accepts merits of criticism
http://www.newsobserver.com/102/story/465647.html
Buried in the sidebar of this story this very important development...

Court officials have taken steps toward having the Duke rape case declared "exceptional," which would allow a single judge to schedule and manage the cases against three lacrosse players.

Durham Trial Court Administrator Kathy Shuart said the parties in the case have agreed in principle to the designation, which would remove the case from Durham's case management system. Instead of monthly court hearings being set, a single judge, who would be appointed by state judicial officials, would decide when to hear motions or call the parties into court, Shuart said.

Duke president offers reply to criticism
http://www.newsobserver.com/102/story/465495.html


130 posted on 07/29/2006 3:10:10 AM PDT by abb (The Dinosaur Media: A One-Way Medium in a Two-Way World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: JLS; Dukie07; Guenevere; Howlin; Locomotive Breath; Jrabbit; investigateworld; maggief; TexKat; ...

Pinging DukeLax List. Very important developments. See post above...


131 posted on 07/29/2006 3:11:30 AM PDT by abb (The Dinosaur Media: A One-Way Medium in a Two-Way World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights; maggief
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
132 posted on 07/29/2006 4:48:58 AM PDT by TommyDale (The wheels are coming off the Nifong wagon...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: abb

"a single judge, who would be appointed by state judicial official"

Well, if it's a judge from outside the Durham crowd,
then there is a chance that may be an improvement.

But right now I am so disillusioned with and disgusted by
N. Carolina that I'm really not expecting much.

(The SBI should be in there investigating Nifong and the Durham prostitution rings and all the rest of the city
government. The AG should have taken control of this case
from Nifong--which despite his ridiculous denials, he has the power to do. And the governor should be asked by the lapdog press--or rather, the accessory press, since they have at each step of the way contributed to this crime of a prosecution--why he appointed Nifong and whether he is now disappointed in him.)


133 posted on 07/29/2006 5:13:14 AM PDT by CondorFlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: CondorFlight

Keep up the pressure, folks.

It's only the spotlight of public opinion which is keeping the Durham crowd from getting away with this (they've operated in the dark before); and NC is only acting at all because of embarassment (justice has little to do with any actions taken by the bar or the judicial system or the law schools in NC--witness the great Duke University school of law, remaining piously silent while a lynching takes place on its front lawn. What magnificent moral authority they will have after this is all over--NOT!)


134 posted on 07/29/2006 5:22:35 AM PDT by CondorFlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: CondorFlight

And of course, no pissant Durham County judge wants to have this hot potato(e) handed to him...


135 posted on 07/29/2006 5:27:36 AM PDT by abb (The Dinosaur Media: A One-Way Medium in a Two-Way World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: abb

"And of course, no pissant Durham County judge wants to have this hot potato(e) handed to him..."

Which shows how far they are from the ideal of what judges are supposed to be. Being afraid of the public reation if they should make a just ruling, is not in the job desciption.


136 posted on 07/29/2006 5:37:12 AM PDT by CondorFlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: CondorFlight; abb; Mike Nifong

I'm optimistic about this news. And considering the timing, I think that this is "the deal" that allowed Cheek to drop out of the race. Heck! The story is a side bar to Nifong's reaction to Cheek's announcement that he would not run. Don't tell me that this isn't related!

And really! Why did Nifong even have to have a news conference? Think about it. Nifong is the sole candidate on the ballot, then enoough signatures are collected to place Cheek, a Democrat, on the ballot (and to keep GOP Monks off of it), then Cheek decides not to run for some lame excuse, and Nifong holds a news conference and releases a statement. Is this bizarre or what?

Cheek's platform was the appointment of a special prosecutor. He didn't get quite that much to drop out of the race (which I'm convinced that he never wanted to run, but the entire matter had to be contained by the local Democrats), but he did get a judge who would not be beholden to the Durham voters.

And this comes right before the third setting when all of those dispositive motions are going to be heard. And the third setting is before the Duke students are back. I wouldn't be surprised if the case is gone before Labor Day.

It strikes me that the only purpose for Nifong to have that news conference was to assure his black constituency that he still believes in this case. But out of the other side of his mouth, Nifong is talking about mistakes and lack of evidence. By appointing an out-of-Durham official to make the call and take the heat, Nifong gets out of this mess and keeps his office.

Sorry that was long.


137 posted on 07/29/2006 6:32:11 AM PDT by Mad-Margaret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Mad-Margaret

It's definitely good news, MM. It would be interesting to learn who/what/where/when the negotiations took place...


138 posted on 07/29/2006 6:35:53 AM PDT by abb (The Dinosaur Media: A One-Way Medium in a Two-Way World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

Re: Re: The Blinco's line cook says,
Author: TRYTON77VI

EVERYONE knows DPD is pulling a cover up to keep the two Duke Lacrosse Investigators clean. .. . BREAKING NEWS... You ballbags at the Durham Police Dept.... ARENT FOOLING ANYONE! OH ... and

BTW ... someone should tell that COP with black hair and mustatch that he should be Driving that SILVER DURHAM POLICE RECURIT VAN when he's drinking up at TEASER'S MENS CLUB.. people are starting to talk.
Posted: 7/29/06 12:28 AM

///

We found the mustache!

Seriously, who can ID this cop, and the others?


139 posted on 07/29/2006 6:36:32 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Link to said establishment...
http://www.teasersmensclub.com/


140 posted on 07/29/2006 6:39:34 AM PDT by abb (The Dinosaur Media: A One-Way Medium in a Two-Way World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 401-420 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson