Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mysterious quasar casts doubt on black holes
NewScientistSpace ^ | 27 July 2006 | David Shiga

Posted on 07/28/2006 5:45:35 PM PDT by annie laurie

A controversial alternative to black hole theory has been bolstered by observations of an object in the distant universe, researchers say. If their interpretation is correct, it might mean black holes do not exist and are in fact bizarre and compact balls of plasma called MECOs.

Rudolph Schild of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts, US, led a team that observed a quasar situated 9 billion light years from Earth. A quasar is a very bright, compact object, whose radiation is usually thought to be generated by a giant black hole devouring its surrounding matter.

A rare cosmological coincidence allowed Schild and his colleagues to probe the structure of the quasar in much finer detail than is normally possible. Those details suggest that the central object is not a black hole. "The structure of the quasar is not at all what had been theorised," Schild told New Scientist.

A black hole, as traditionally understood, is an object with such a powerful gravitational field that even light is not fast enough to escape it. Anything that gets within a certain distance of the black hole's centre, called the event horizon, will be trapped.

A well accepted property of black holes is that they cannot sustain a magnetic field of their own. But observations of quasar Q0957+561 indicate that the object powering it does have a magnetic field, Schild's team says. For this reason, they believe that rather than a black hole, this quasar contains something called a magnetospheric eternally collapsing object (MECO). If so, it would be best evidence yet for such an object. Flickering clues

The researchers used gravitational lensing to make their close observation of the quasar. This technique exploits rare coincidences that can occur when a galaxy sits directly between a distant object and observers on Earth.

The gravity of the intervening galaxy acts like a lens. As the intervening galaxy's individual stars pass in front of the quasar, this bending varies, making the quasar appear to flicker.

Carefully scrutinising this flickering allowed the researchers to probe fine details of the quasar's structure that are normally far too small to be resolved by even the most powerful telescopes. Magnetic sweep

The researchers found that the disc of material surrounding the central object has a hole in it with a width of about 4000 Astronomical Units (1 AU is the distance between the Earth and the Sun). This gap suggests that material has been swept out by magnetic forces from the central object, the researchers say, and must therefore be a MECO, not a black hole.

"I believe this is the first evidence that the whole black hole paradigm is incorrect," says Darryl Leiter of the Marwood Astrophysics Research Center in Charottesville, Virginia, US, who co-authored the study. He says that where astronomers think they see black holes, they are actually looking at MECOs.

According to the MECO theory, objects in our universe can never actually collapse to form black holes. When an object gets very dense and hot, subatomic particles start popping in and out of existence inside it in huge numbers, producing copious amounts of radiation. Outward pressure from this radiation halts the collapse so the object remains a hot ball of plasma rather than becoming a black hole. Extremely complex

But Chris Reynolds of the University of Maryland, in College Park, US, says the evidence for a MECO inside this quasar is not convincing. The apparent hole in the disc could be filled with very hot, tenuous gas, which would not radiate much and would be hard to see, he says. "Especially if you're looking with an optical telescope, which is how these observations were made, you wouldn't see that gas at all," he told New Scientist.

Leiter says this scenario would leave other things unexplained, however. The observations show that a small ring at the inner edge of the disc is glowing, which is a sign that it has been heated by a strong magnetic field, he says. In Reynolds's scenario, one would expect a much broader section of the disc to be heated, he says.

In any case, says Reynolds, it is difficult to draw conclusions from the team's detailed comparisons of their observations with models of black holes because those models are far from definitive. "We know the accretion of gas into black holes is an extremely complex phenomenon," he says. "We don’t know precisely what that would look like."

"It would be truly exciting if there was compelling evidence found for a non-black-hole object in these quasars," Reynolds adds. "I just don't think that this fits."

Journal reference: The Astronomical Journal (vol 132, p 420)

TOPICS: Astronomy
KEYWORDS: astronomy; blackholes; haltonarp; quasar; space

1 posted on 07/28/2006 5:45:36 PM PDT by annie laurie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis


2 posted on 07/28/2006 5:45:52 PM PDT by annie laurie (All that is gold does not glitter, not all those who wander are lost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annie laurie

Black holes == hollow shells of their former selves, unendingly spinning and collpasing at the same time.

3 posted on 07/28/2006 5:49:13 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annie laurie

I could see if it was casting a shadow but doubt? I don't know!

4 posted on 07/28/2006 5:50:04 PM PDT by Khepera (Do not remove by penalty of law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Khepera
What's with this racist Mysterious Quasar? He can't be related to Queasy Mfume, can he? Queasy Mfume/Mysterious Quasar - pretty similar, I'd say.

And why isn't Jesse, The Adulterer, Jackson all over Mysterious Quasar for denigrating black holes? Black holes should be treated with the same respect as white holes, or Asian holes, or any other hole.

5 posted on 07/28/2006 6:01:15 PM PDT by 69ConvertibleFirebird (Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv


6 posted on 07/28/2006 6:02:17 PM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 69ConvertibleFirebird

There's a hole lot o dissin goin on in the MSM.

7 posted on 07/28/2006 6:03:38 PM PDT by Khepera (Do not remove by penalty of law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: annie laurie
magnetospheric eternally collapsing object

There's an interesting physics discussion in there as well as a philosophical one.

And now for the joke

magnetospheric eternally collapsing object

Kinda like the democratic party.
8 posted on 07/28/2006 6:10:34 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Everybody's entitled to my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annie laurie

I'd like to know the answer, but at 9 billion light years from earth, that answer is going to be more for curiosity than necessity.

9 posted on 07/28/2006 6:15:02 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Gnip. ;') Thanks!

10 posted on 07/28/2006 10:24:36 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Thursday, July 27, 2006.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Astronomers Baffled by Mysterious New Object
By John Maynard and Jamie Stensrud
April 24, 2000

Magnetars Exert Strong Pull on Astronomers
By Dave Dooling
Special to
Oct 20 1999 09:22:29 ET

Meet the Indian who took on Stephen Hawking | August 03, 2004 10:06 IST |
Posted on 08/02/2004 10:16:56 PM PDT by CarrotAndStick

Mystery over star that’s out of control
This Is Wiltshire
10:50am Monday 1st May 2006

Fast-spinning neutron star smashes speed limit
19:00 12 January 2006 news service
Maggie McKee

Stealing Energy from a Black Hole
Scientists have found energy escaping from a distant, supermassive black hole.
by Vanessa Thomas
(2000 or 2001)

Black Holes Spin?
By Robert Kunzig
DISCOVER Vol. 23 No. 7 (July 2002)

Scientists watch black hole rip a star apart
By Robert Roy Britt
Senior Science Writer
Updated: 3:26 p.m. ET Feb. 18, 2004

11 posted on 07/28/2006 11:49:03 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Thursday, July 27, 2006.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson