OMG!! It's L. Ron HUBBARD!!!! It TOOK!!
Posted on 08/10/2006 2:01:16 PM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet
One of the most elusive figures in Hollywood since the heyday of Howard Hughes may be about to make her debut.
The New York Post reported on Wednesday that Vanity Fair magazine has landed the first photos of Suri Cruise, the baby born to actor Tom Cruise and actress Katie Holmes last April 18 and who has never been seen by the public, although family friend Penelope Cruz says she is "beautiful."
The Post said the pictures were taken by celebrity photographer Annie Leibovitz and will be published this fall.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
OMG!! It's L. Ron HUBBARD!!!! It TOOK!!
Rosemary's baby?
yeah...heh heh.
fringe with the Suri on top.
I feel sorry for the kid.
Ah, my eyes!!
Certainly not Tom Tom's.
IMHO, you can't get pregnant the way he likes to have sex.
(No, no insider knowledge.)
Tom's gonna let his kid out of the closet?
.....groan.....
"IMHO, you can't get pregnant the way he likes to have sex."
According to Mimi Rogers, Tom doesn't like to have sex:
"HOLLYWOOD - Hollywood actress Mimi Rogers split from her ex-husband Tom Cruise because he refused to have sex and wanted to become a monk. Rogers, who was the actor's first wife in the 1980s before he married and subsequently divorced Nicole Kidman, ended up getting a divorce from Cruise in 1990 when his desire to make love became non-existent.
She says, "He was seriously thinking of becoming a monk.
"He thought he had to be celibate to maintain the purity of his instrument, but my instrument needed tuning, and we had to split."
http://www.hollywood.com/news/detail/id/2443576
lol. not bad....not bad. caught me off guard for a second. check the head for the six's.
And here is a recent picture of the proud father.
.jpg)
Maybe it was a Scientology "group" effort to ensure the take.
I don't support hollywood celebrities and their knee jerk causes to all things liberal but there is more evidence that Hillary digs girls than there is that Cruise takes his deliveries in the back door. Flame on if you need to but this is basically just rumor-mongering with no point to it. Can't we just wait to roast him when he does something liberal and stupid (sorry for the redundancy in that sentence)? And seriously, who gives a f**k what this kid looks like? Any magazine who pays for pictures of a newborn should be boycotted by all sane, intelligent people! (What? That already happened? Oh, sorry. My bad....)
"Flame on if you need to"
No flame here. I hope the kid turns out fine. Just messing around with his bizarre behavior of not showing the kid except through controlled photos. But, hey, its his and kate's kid.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.