Opps, this fellow fled, so he ain't as whacked as he would like people to believe.. Also this fellow collected tons of info on the case, so he knows he is giving misleading info... and I assume it is on purpose. I think they may have their man. IMHO...
Yeah, crazy like a fox. If he was writing a book about and had previously written a research paper in college about the Ramsey case then he knows the publicly released version of the autopsy says no drugs detected.
OTH, an actual toxicology report page is missing from the nine page autopsy report and the two lines on the first (summary) page showing nothing found looks inserted after the fact. JMO
The thing that tweaks me is his ex-wife's statement that he was with them on Christmas Day in 96. They had 3 young children, so I think a father's absence on that day would be easily remembered, so I don't really see how he could have done it unless she is lying.
She got a divorce decree that does not allow him any contact with the kids and that says something about how she feels about his character right there.
You can bet LE in every jurisdiction with a missing or murdered girl of similar age range is looking at him hard now and his DNA is going to get compared to a lot of cold cases.
I agree. He said what he wanted you to hear: "It was an accident". He even said "That makes it 2nd degree". But he also said "no comment" to some questions. If you answer the big questions, why avoid the little ones with "no comment". His resume lists writer/actor as hobbies.