Posted on 08/21/2006 5:13:48 AM PDT by NapkinUser
...and the MSM [all members of the CFR] isn't saying a word about it. It's all part of the plan.
Well, think about it. We'd have all the oil we'd need (Mexico and Canada) All the Natural Gas, too. All the cheap labor, all the cheap votes, and all the Cuban cigars we could smoke!..................
"North American Union Threatens U.S. Sovereignty"
It certainly does, Ollie!
Welcome aboard and good morning.
Council on Foreign Affairs? Did the CFR change its name?.........
"Moreover, it would involve our government in so many common regulatory mandates with these two nations as to render the sovereignty of the United States a memory of what national self-governance is supposed to be."
Sounds just like the European Union.
It appears as though Jerome Corsi exhausted himself finding new ways to type the same thing, so someone else has taken over.
Ping.
As this does not come from the hated WorldNetDailey and from the often "dissed" Corsi, cannot wait for the "W" apologists and "My President--Right or Wrong" crowd to come up with ways to attack this article.
I voted for Bush (twice) and generally like him. Nevertheless, in issues such as this (as well as his continued disregard for our safety and security thru his intransigence in promoting this Shamnesty proposals) I wholeheartedly disagree with him and I have (AND WILL) continue to criticize him, when deserved--regardless of all the crap I (and others) get when we have the temerity of taking exception with their (and OUR'S, don't forget) "glorious leader."
Here ya' go, I'll start: "articles" usually have examples . . . since this has none, it's more of an opinion-piece.
Freudian slip? Did you mean to type Wilhelm?
There is an easy resolution to this problem.
Simply annex all of Canada, with the exception of Quebec (which would be allowed to declare sovereignity), then admit each of the provinces individually as states.
Then annex all of Mexico, admitting each each of their states on an individual basis as well, as soon as they have achieved a basic competence in English for the majority of their citizens, and the legal code is reformed so it comforms with, or at least eliminates the parts that conflict with, common law in the United States.
Now, stop bothering us about that. We got a global war to fight.
Quebec could be treated the same as Texas. They can join provisionally. If they don't like it, then they can leave the union...........
That's a perfect idea.
(sarcasm)
If I hadn't heard of this before, I'd just see it as the rant of some paranoid reactionary.
But I HAVE seen this before, and now I'm starting to wonder if the outrageous leaps that these and similar articles have made are accurate (open borders, unified currency, etc.).
If so, it's a suicide pact with Canada to drink the Mexico kool-aid.
It seems that regardless of the subject matter of an issue, the author seems to carry more weight than the substance, especially for those inclined to be blinded by prejudice.
You neglected to bring into play Net World Daily, which in itself (along with Corsi) is automatic grounds for denigration and derision.
See my post #9
Here ya' go, I'll start: "articles" usually have examples . . . since this has none, it's more of an opinion-piece.
Ah, exactly what would you call the following, if not an "example," the author's "imagination?"
"The SPP didnt start out as an idea the presidents of the three nations started kicking around on March 23, 2005 in Waco, Texas, but it became the official policy of the United States at a special summit convened by President Bush and joined by then Mexican President Vicente Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin."b>
In addition, you know what they say about opinions, right? There just like a**holes, everyone's got one, which I attribute to all those who refuse to EVEN consider the possibility that our President--who whatever faults or virtues he may possess--one CANNOT DISSMIS his desire and support for a North American Union, as false, when considering the fact that he has done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to help secure our borders, and is OPENLY ADVOCATING, amnesty for ALL illegal aliens.
As my pappy used to say, "where there's smoke ......" or if it "walks like a duck, talks like a duck......."
There was talk of this North American Union on talk radio a couple of weeks ago.
A couple of truck drivers called and said they had there trucks inspected and instead of a state sticker the inspectors put a North American Union sticker on the truck. The sticker had three crossed flages, that's right, the U S; Canada and Mexico flags.
It's already started folks.
You may complain all you wish about the methods used by this author's (or Corsi's) detractors, but he leaves them no other choice but to respond the way they do. From a rhetorical standpoint, it's comic. This "article" is a virtual "kick me" sign.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.