Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North American Union Threatens U.S. Sovereignty
HumanEventsOnline ^ | Aug 21, 2006 | Alan Caruba

Posted on 08/21/2006 5:13:48 AM PDT by NapkinUser

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last

1 posted on 08/21/2006 5:13:49 AM PDT by NapkinUser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
"Like termites eating away at the sovereignty of the United States of America, this grandiose scheme is a major threat to American security and prosperity."

...and the MSM [all members of the CFR] isn't saying a word about it. It's all part of the plan.

2 posted on 08/21/2006 5:17:48 AM PDT by patriot_wes (Law of Unintended Consequences; Infant Baptism = an unbelieving, unsaved church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriot_wes

Well, think about it. We'd have all the oil we'd need (Mexico and Canada) All the Natural Gas, too. All the cheap labor, all the cheap votes, and all the Cuban cigars we could smoke!..................


3 posted on 08/21/2006 5:24:18 AM PDT by Red Badger (Is Castro dead yet?........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

"North American Union Threatens U.S. Sovereignty"

It certainly does, Ollie!

Welcome aboard and good morning.


4 posted on 08/21/2006 5:24:38 AM PDT by RoadTest (I will not be afraid of ten thousands of people, that have set themselves against me round about.Ps3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

Council on Foreign Affairs? Did the CFR change its name?.........


5 posted on 08/21/2006 5:25:39 AM PDT by Red Badger (Is Castro dead yet?........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

"Moreover, it would involve our government in so many common regulatory mandates with these two nations as to render the sovereignty of the United States a memory of what national self-governance is supposed to be."

Sounds just like the European Union.


6 posted on 08/21/2006 5:26:20 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot; expat_panama; nopardons; Mase

It appears as though Jerome Corsi exhausted himself finding new ways to type the same thing, so someone else has taken over.


7 posted on 08/21/2006 5:28:40 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Ping.


8 posted on 08/21/2006 5:30:05 AM PDT by NapkinUser (CNN/Fox News: Blah blah Israel blah blah Lebanon blah blah Palestine blah blah Middle East blah...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
Yippee. Got to love this.

As this does not come from the hated WorldNetDailey and from the often "dissed" Corsi, cannot wait for the "W" apologists and "My President--Right or Wrong" crowd to come up with ways to attack this article.

I voted for Bush (twice) and generally like him. Nevertheless, in issues such as this (as well as his continued disregard for our safety and security thru his intransigence in promoting this Shamnesty proposals) I wholeheartedly disagree with him and I have (AND WILL) continue to criticize him, when deserved--regardless of all the crap I (and others) get when we have the temerity of taking exception with their (and OUR'S, don't forget) "glorious leader."

9 posted on 08/21/2006 5:33:06 AM PDT by seasoned traditionalist (ALL MUSLIMS ARE NOT TERRORISTS, BUT ALL TERRORISTS WHO WANT TO DESTROY OUR COUNTRY, ARE MUSLIMS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: seasoned traditionalist
. . . cannot wait for the "W" apologists and "My President--Right or Wrong" crowd to come up with ways to attack this article.

Here ya' go, I'll start: "articles" usually have examples . . . since this has none, it's more of an opinion-piece.

11 posted on 08/21/2006 5:37:23 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Architect Howard Roark
. . . by Willam [sic] Norman Grigg.

Freudian slip? Did you mean to type Wilhelm?

12 posted on 08/21/2006 5:38:58 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

There is an easy resolution to this problem.

Simply annex all of Canada, with the exception of Quebec (which would be allowed to declare sovereignity), then admit each of the provinces individually as states.

Then annex all of Mexico, admitting each each of their states on an individual basis as well, as soon as they have achieved a basic competence in English for the majority of their citizens, and the legal code is reformed so it comforms with, or at least eliminates the parts that conflict with, common law in the United States.

Now, stop bothering us about that. We got a global war to fight.


13 posted on 08/21/2006 5:39:38 AM PDT by alloysteel (When in doubt, forge ahead anyway. To outsiders, it looks the same as boldness. Or plain crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

Quebec could be treated the same as Texas. They can join provisionally. If they don't like it, then they can leave the union...........


14 posted on 08/21/2006 5:41:58 AM PDT by Red Badger (Is Castro dead yet?........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

That's a perfect idea.

(sarcasm)


15 posted on 08/21/2006 5:42:40 AM PDT by NapkinUser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

If I hadn't heard of this before, I'd just see it as the rant of some paranoid reactionary.
But I HAVE seen this before, and now I'm starting to wonder if the outrageous leaps that these and similar articles have made are accurate (open borders, unified currency, etc.).
If so, it's a suicide pact with Canada to drink the Mexico kool-aid.


16 posted on 08/21/2006 5:43:01 AM PDT by Know Thine Enemy (Islam is a warrior code masquerading as a religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
It appears as though Jerome Corsi exhausted himself finding new ways to type the same thing, so someone else has taken over.

It seems that regardless of the subject matter of an issue, the author seems to carry more weight than the substance, especially for those inclined to be blinded by prejudice.

You neglected to bring into play Net World Daily, which in itself (along with Corsi) is automatic grounds for denigration and derision.

See my post #9

17 posted on 08/21/2006 5:57:16 AM PDT by seasoned traditionalist (ALL MUSLIMS ARE NOT TERRORISTS, BUT ALL TERRORISTS WHO WANT TO DESTROY OUR COUNTRY, ARE MUSLIMS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
. . . cannot wait for the "W" apologists and "My President--Right or Wrong" crowd to come up with ways to attack this article.

Here ya' go, I'll start: "articles" usually have examples . . . since this has none, it's more of an opinion-piece.

Ah, exactly what would you call the following, if not an "example," the author's "imagination?"

"The SPP didn’t start out as an idea the presidents of the three nations started kicking around on March 23, 2005 in Waco, Texas, but it became the official policy of the United States at a special summit convened by President Bush and joined by then Mexican President Vicente Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin."b>

In addition, you know what they say about opinions, right? There just like a**holes, everyone's got one, which I attribute to all those who refuse to EVEN consider the possibility that our President--who whatever faults or virtues he may possess--one CANNOT DISSMIS his desire and support for a North American Union, as false, when considering the fact that he has done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to help secure our borders, and is OPENLY ADVOCATING, amnesty for ALL illegal aliens.

As my pappy used to say, "where there's smoke ......" or if it "walks like a duck, talks like a duck......."

18 posted on 08/21/2006 6:11:59 AM PDT by seasoned traditionalist (ALL MUSLIMS ARE NOT TERRORISTS, BUT ALL TERRORISTS WHO WANT TO DESTROY OUR COUNTRY, ARE MUSLIMS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: seasoned traditionalist

There was talk of this North American Union on talk radio a couple of weeks ago.

A couple of truck drivers called and said they had there trucks inspected and instead of a state sticker the inspectors put a North American Union sticker on the truck. The sticker had three crossed flages, that's right, the U S; Canada and Mexico flags.

It's already started folks.


19 posted on 08/21/2006 6:25:58 AM PDT by abseaman (I stand befor the alter of almighty God and swear to fight tyranny in allits forms. TJefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: seasoned traditionalist
Here's a quick primer on "examples." If the theme of the piece is "we are losing our sovereignty because of these agreements," then providing an example of the same would be appropriate. Then folks could debate the propriety of the example, instead of attacking the author for his unsupported opinion.

You may complain all you wish about the methods used by this author's (or Corsi's) detractors, but he leaves them no other choice but to respond the way they do. From a rhetorical standpoint, it's comic. This "article" is a virtual "kick me" sign.

20 posted on 08/21/2006 6:28:51 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson