Skip to comments.JonBenet Ramsey Murder Suspect Karr - Case Thread 2
Posted on 08/28/2006 9:01:50 AM PDT by Rte66
click here to read article
So, where does this leave the case against JMK?.....not that I expected a match....
Nah, you just seem to know what you're talking about. Since we don't have any evidence yet (maybe a toxo will show up later on the pineapple) we're back to our list of 7. Anyone?
1.) JMK alibi is undocumented
2.) JMK confessed to culpable knowledge of the crime
3.) JMK 'fits the profile'
4.) JMK's 1st ex-wife indicates letters signed SBTC
5.) "Shall Be The Conquerer" signature in HS annual
6.) Yes, crazies falsely confess, but real perps also involve themselves in investigations for thrills. It happens both ways. JMK tried to communicate with PR.
7.) the DA *must* have more on him
actually, that angle wasn't exhausted.
one twist that may come from a trial of Karr - it may finally allow a full public disclosure of all of the evidence in the case.
well let's wait and see if they release him or give him back to California.
I'd love to see the info the preoffesor ptovided to DA Lacy.
In limbo. He is wanted in CA, but now what? I do not know.
Can they access who he has been in contact with through the internet if it was done at an internet cafe?
Ohhh boy. I'm glad I don't work for the Boulder DA right now...What pains me about this is if the DA doesn't really have a smoking gun then it's just more tragedy in this case, tragedy that's been dragging on for 10 years.
I would too.
But, but, bu, Nancy Grace complained that the judge issued a gag order on everyone and anybody associated with this case.
So much for gag orders --- gag.
Car battery charger....Mine is smaller than my handbag.
It all goes back to that mendacious Professor Tracey.
I wander what Karr will say to convince us that he did, in fact, do it?
I also wander if charges will be brought for the false confession? Would that be considered obstruction?
he didn't confess to anything. "I was with her when she died" can mean alot of things.
True. Are false statements considered obstruction?
I don't know, Boukder jumped the gun and the media kept firing the shots. He's apparently delusional and might really think he did it. 15 minutes of fame and a lifetime of shame, hopefully.
Do you know if DNA was ever run on the housekeeper's husband?
No charges against JMK. Might be released shortly.
Anybody know what sample they tested against? What was it, where was it, etc.? Just want to clear that up.
but seriously, Karr is a sicko and a pervert. these are the only facts not in doubt. the best thing the Boulder DA could do for this society - is to drop this quickly if there is nothing to it, and let him be charged in California.
yep, the writing was on the wall
well, I assume from last night's discussion - its the full 13 marker sample.
Let me try this again. I accidentally posted to myself the first time.
Do you know if DNA was ever run on the housekeeper's husband.
Well, I guess all the blogs and forums are right back to the parents or brother did it.
JMK goes to prison on pornography charges, sentenced to 5 years, out in 22 months. Writes a book while he's there.
Wonder if the arrest affadavit will have any interesting "unknown" information when it's unsealed?
Give polygraphs to both the profssor and to Karr.
See who's the bigger liar, just for the hell of it.
Thanks. Where was it found? Was it mixed with something else?
Not necessarily. I'm interested in where that DNA came from. Do you know?
That would be interesting to see if there are unknown facts in there. That's why I'm wondering about the possibility of Karr being in contact with the perp. I wonder if any effort is being made to see who all he was corresponding with through the internet?
I still don't think it was anyone in JonBenet's immediate family.
That's a saga by itself. I think what might be germane to this case is to see if it can be traced back to...you know who. We know the Boulder DA and the prof were a little too chummy but, I wonder?
No now NG also said that the DA LACY will nOT be filing shcarges....lol.
Thanks for the ride lady!
Yeeepppp. Whew, I bet there's a lot sweaty foreheads in Boulder right now.
who is the leaker?
There should be... he was brought back on "evidence" that Proffessor Tracey provided to Mary Lacy.
I think we are entitled to see it.
Likely they she let us --- might "harm" the case for future suspects, I mean crackpots.
the problem is, his contacts with the professor and the police (thinking it was Patsy) - provided him with a conduit for details about the case, being fed back to him.
he would have to posess some physical evidence from the crime scene to tie him to it.
A TV station.... leaker in her office? Dunno. Maybe herself. Too ashamed to face the media camera?
Do you know where the sample they tested against was found? Was it mixed with something else? Thanks
the only way to ever get the truth in this case - would be for the state of colorado to appoint a special prosecutor. that's been true for a long time now.
Yea, I think she's leaked. In more ways that one.
that = than
I doubt it. Seriously.
Agree. They need a jury pooled from the entire state. Can a special prosecutor do that?
also true. I think Tracey may have some explain'n to do.
It was a leak... hopefully they find out who leaked it.
Until the Colorado DA's office comes out and makes a statement I am not going buy into it.
Yes, we do need to see it. And we need some kind of investigation into this independent of Boulder authorities.
You'll like to have to wait untik cocktail hour concludes.
I reckon the stiff stuff is flowing freely in Lacy's office.