Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brad Pitt is a Genius (uses gay marriage ban as excuse to not wed Jolie)
Federal Review ^ | Saturday, September 09, 2006

Posted on 09/09/2006 1:04:09 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines

HOLLYWOOD--Brad Pitt has found a way to stay a bachelor forever, while still burnishing his image as a sensitive man of the new millennium.

The associated Press reports that Pitt has come up with a brilliant excuse to avoid another trip to the alter:

Brad Pitt, ever the social activist, says he won't be marrying Angelina Jolie until the restrictions on who can marry whom are dropped.

"Angie and I will consider tying the knot when everyone else in the country who wants to be married is legally able," the 42-year-old actor reveals in Esquire magazine's October issue, on newsstands September. 19.

Obviously, this won't happen for a long time. Too many people in America oppose gay marriage.

And, even if gays are allowed to marry, siblings won't be able to. Neither will minors, or people who want to marry their pets.

Therefore, Pitt will probably never see "everyone...in the country who wants to be married...legally able" to do so in his lifetime.

As a result, Pitt can continue to shtup one of the hottest women on the planet, without having to ever marry her, and his excuse makes him look like a "social activist" in a town that values left wing politics above all other values.

Genius I tells ya. Genius.


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: hollyweird; hollywood; homosexualagenda; jolie; media; pitt

1 posted on 09/09/2006 1:04:11 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
One man's genius is another man's POS.
2 posted on 09/09/2006 1:05:36 PM PDT by Vision (God did not give us a spirit of timidity, but a spirit of power, love and self-discipline 2Timothy1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Tell that to Our Heavenly Father in the here after...


3 posted on 09/09/2006 1:06:12 PM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

He didn't specifically say the gay marriage ban. Do you suppose he might be holding out for multiple paretners and / or farm animals?


4 posted on 09/09/2006 1:06:58 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Katherine Harris for US Senate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

LOL!! Who would want to marry a girl that was TATTOOED??? YUK!!


5 posted on 09/09/2006 1:08:35 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kabooms"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

And your just using Brad Pitt as an excuse to post Jolie pictures.


6 posted on 09/09/2006 1:08:41 PM PDT by sully777 (You have flies in your eyes--Catch-22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

I wouldn't marry that skank either!


7 posted on 09/09/2006 1:10:22 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vision
A Pitt... is a-hole.
8 posted on 09/09/2006 1:18:12 PM PDT by johnny7 (“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy

I couldn't agree more


9 posted on 09/09/2006 1:21:13 PM PDT by Lib-Lickers 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
He didn't specifically say the gay marriage ban. Do you suppose he might be holding out for multiple paretners and / or farm animals?

In fact, the article posits the very same theory.

10 posted on 09/09/2006 1:23:30 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sully777
And your just using Brad Pitt as an excuse to post Jolie pictures.

And if I hadn't, half the thread would be people complaining "where are the pictures?". ;-)

11 posted on 09/09/2006 1:24:34 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

Definitely the "multiple partners" thing ~ she's gay, and no doubt Brad's going to want to be interested in what that drags in eh!


12 posted on 09/09/2006 1:24:50 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

You are right. The way I read it, it was everyone with anyone. Throw out incest laws, age limits, and number of spouses, and yes let's include animals.


13 posted on 09/09/2006 1:24:55 PM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vision
'One man's genius is another man's POS."
What he is as a character bears no relation to the degree of creaive ingenuity demonstrated by him on this occasion [or by whomever wrote or told him these words to use]. It is apples and oranges. Similarly, the Unabomber Kaszinsky [spelling?] used to be a mathematician; and his quality as a mathematician is not connected with his "unabombity", nor could one be judged by another. .
14 posted on 09/09/2006 1:27:45 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Where are the pictures?


15 posted on 09/09/2006 1:28:05 PM PDT by sully777 (You have flies in your eyes--Catch-22)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

The real reason is because of all the body and face hardware she wears.

She cannot get past a metal detector at the courthouse for the marriage license.


16 posted on 09/09/2006 1:32:30 PM PDT by Inge_CAV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

If THAT was the only reason the jerk won't marry the skank -- he's even stupider that I had imagined..

Plus-- who gives a shit?

Semper Fi


17 posted on 09/09/2006 1:35:29 PM PDT by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Advice from his lawyer and/or accountant,no doubt.


18 posted on 09/09/2006 1:42:12 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative ("An empty limousine pulled up and Hillary Clinton got out")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy
" LOL!! Who would want to marry a girl that was TATTOOED??? YUK!!"

Euw yuck, not me;

I think tats generally add an interesting edge to someone who’s very pretty. But I agree that they subtract from women who struggle with femininity, hurting her after she ages, (having made tens of millions from her looks and edgy style). Poor girl.

19 posted on 09/09/2006 1:44:36 PM PDT by elfman2 (An army of amateurs doing the media's job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Marriage is a vocation from God. Somehow after reading Mr. Pitt's idiotic words of widsom, I do not think he could ever live up to such a vocation.


20 posted on 09/09/2006 1:53:58 PM PDT by Gerish (Feed your faith and your doubts will starve to death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
In fact, the article posits the very same theory.

Yeah, but who here reads the fill article? :) (just kidding)

21 posted on 09/09/2006 2:24:37 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Katherine Harris for US Senate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: elfman2

There is NO tatoo that is pretty...NONE...when men in the service get them I can understand, but a WOMAN???? YIKES...SKANKY....would you want a wife that had her picture taken like the one you posted??? Disgusting.


22 posted on 09/09/2006 2:27:27 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kabooms"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

The writer wasn't aware that this would only be funny if Pitt was more of a man, but in his case the joke just doesn't seem to apply.

The men that should be amused by this writer's take, are just as likely to believe that Jolie told him that.


23 posted on 09/09/2006 2:31:19 PM PDT by ansel12 (Life is exquisite... of great beauty, keenly felt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
I could fricken care less.
24 posted on 09/09/2006 2:36:22 PM PDT by Dallas59 (ISLAMOFASCISM!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

You cared enough to post. ;-)


25 posted on 09/09/2006 2:45:56 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy

LOL, Our tastes may vary in many ways. If my wife was as complex, gorgeous, and head strong as Angelina, I'd figure the tats went with the package.

I don't follow Hollywood and don't know much about her. As I recall she had a rough adolescents and some kind of bipolar issues. She looks interesting. Marry? Fasten those seatbelts!


26 posted on 09/09/2006 2:48:16 PM PDT by elfman2 (An army of amateurs doing the media's job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

It seems to me to be his very best 'cover' for the likelihood that Angelina Jolie doesn't want to marry this empty fool under any circumstances.


27 posted on 09/09/2006 2:53:21 PM PDT by Continental Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Continental Soldier

"It seems to me to be his very best 'cover' for the likelihood that Angelina Jolie doesn't want to marry this empty fool under any circumstances."

Good observation!


28 posted on 09/09/2006 3:09:36 PM PDT by elfman2 (An army of amateurs doing the media's job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

WHAT is the attraction to Angelina Jolie?? Man, in that picture she looks like a real woof!!

In most pictures she looks like a woof.

(Okay, she has boobs & over inflated lips, but is that all men attracted too)


29 posted on 09/09/2006 3:13:54 PM PDT by KosmicKitty (WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KosmicKitty

The interesting part of all this, that the looks of women have nothing to do with their sexuality. None, nada, zip.

Gabor


30 posted on 09/09/2006 4:16:40 PM PDT by Casio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Brad Pitt should march in the Gay Pride parade.


31 posted on 09/09/2006 4:53:54 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

MOhammed had a 6-year old bride (who he had sex with when she turned 8) and several OTHER wives.

Muslims cannot follow the actions of their leader within the US so I think that Brad can milk this "protest" thing a lot further.

Funny how at ONE TIME he was able to get married without protest.


32 posted on 09/10/2006 1:03:47 AM PDT by weegee (Remember "Remember the Maine"? Well in the current war "Remember the Baby Milk Factory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Are you sure he's not referring to vampires?

Jolie's a pervert, and about the ugliest excuse for a sex symbol I've ever seen. Her lips are just like Daffy Duck's....


33 posted on 09/10/2006 4:26:16 PM PDT by Imnotalib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KosmicKitty
(Okay, she has boobs & over inflated lips, but is that all men attracted too)

Actually, her lips are part of what turns me off when looking at her. Throw in the tatoos(I agree with those who don't like them on women), and Angelina is a non-starter for me. What really surprises me is that Pitt dumped Jennifer Anniston for that skank.

34 posted on 09/10/2006 4:35:31 PM PDT by ABG(anybody but Gore) ("By the time I'm finished with you, you're gonna wish you felt this good again" - Jack Bauer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy

Me! I've been trying to talk my wife into a tatoo for 16 straight years now. I happen to love tats on women.


35 posted on 09/10/2006 9:09:34 PM PDT by Melas (Offending stupid people since 1963)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KosmicKitty

"WHAT is the attraction to Angelina Jolie?? "

You've got me. From my own observation, maybe 1 in 3 guys think that she's attractive, whereas around 4 of 5 women think she is.

I'm one of the 2 in 3 guys who think she's a dog.


36 posted on 09/10/2006 9:26:52 PM PDT by Ursine_East_Facing_North
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Ursine_East_Facing_North

Gimme Catherine Zeta Jones or Sarah Michelle Gellar over that overrated tramp any day.


37 posted on 09/10/2006 9:40:23 PM PDT by ABG(anybody but Gore) ("By the time I'm finished with you, you're gonna wish you felt this good again" - Jack Bauer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: elfman2

she has HUGE ugly feet! - she has man feet!


38 posted on 09/10/2006 9:51:39 PM PDT by stlnative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: stlnative
she has HUGE ugly feet! - she has man feet!

I've known women for years before I even learned that they had feet. I don't get this thread. Jolie for all her faults is smoking hot. Scratch that, she's beyond smoking hot and well into that "I'd die for a night" category. Men have given up body parts for lesser women.

39 posted on 09/11/2006 5:55:44 AM PDT by Melas (Offending stupid people since 1963)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ABG(anybody but Gore)

You really think vanilla Aniston is sexier than Jolie? Really, or are you just saying that for this thread? Aniston is marginally cute, but neuter. Physically attractive with zero sex appeal. Jolie could survive an industrial accident and still excude sex appeal from her remaining pores.


40 posted on 09/11/2006 5:57:46 AM PDT by Melas (Offending stupid people since 1963)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy

Completely wrong. Tattoos are extremely attractive on women and utterly enticing. I swear, every now and then I get the feeling that more and more FReepers are 90 years old. I guess I should just be thankful that this isn't one of those threads that make ME feel old.


41 posted on 09/11/2006 6:01:22 AM PDT by Melas (Offending stupid people since 1963)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Melas

Maybe for you. I've never really found Jolie attractive. And yes, I'd definitely take Anniston over her.


42 posted on 09/11/2006 6:12:14 AM PDT by ABG(anybody but Gore) ("By the time I'm finished with you, you're gonna wish you felt this good again" - Jack Bauer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Melas

Your wife has sense...Tattoos ruin a body.


43 posted on 09/11/2006 8:02:35 AM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kabooms"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Melas

Don't worry...we know you are young....and dumb...to think that tattoos are pretty. It's TRIBAL maybe, but pretty it's NEVER.


44 posted on 09/11/2006 9:11:45 AM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kabooms"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy
What are you talking about? When people with tattoos age and the colors all merge into one messy looking stain they are true art!
45 posted on 09/11/2006 9:18:02 AM PDT by linn37 (Have you hugged your Phlebotomist today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: linn37

LOL!!


46 posted on 09/11/2006 9:22:52 AM PDT by Suzy Quzy ("When Cabals Go Kabooms"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy
Don't worry...we know you are young....and dumb...to think that tattoos are pretty. It's TRIBAL maybe, but pretty it's NEVER.

Lady, that little angel in my arms on my homepage is my granddaughter. I'm a lot of things, but young is no longer numbered amongst them. Quite, the contrary, I'm a happily married, educated, financially stable, church going, middle aged man who happens to find tattoos extremely alluring.

It would seem that you have some stereotypes to get past.

47 posted on 09/11/2006 6:00:21 PM PDT by Melas (Offending stupid people since 1963)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson