Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North American Union threat gets attention of congressmen
WorldNetdaily.com ^ | October 1, 2006

Posted on 10/02/2006 3:55:59 AM PDT by Man50D

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-357 next last

1 posted on 10/02/2006 3:56:00 AM PDT by Man50D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Man50D; admin

Thanks for posting this!

Release of the FOIA information and now a Resolution being requested by Congress certainly ought to warrant that these discussions on North American Union / SPP be taken seriously and remain in 'news' rather than the usual immediate move to 'chat'?


2 posted on 10/02/2006 4:17:41 AM PDT by Kimberly GG (Tancredo '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D; All

Beware of the Stonecutters...


3 posted on 10/02/2006 4:19:21 AM PDT by KevinDavis (Nancy you ignorant Slut!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smartass; JustPiper

*ping*

I saw that you posted this within a thread, but was glad to see that someone designated a thread for it. It is a HUGE step forward!


4 posted on 10/02/2006 4:19:43 AM PDT by Kimberly GG (Tancredo '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

There was a time in the USA when borders, language, and culture mattered. The very idea of a North American Union is anathema to me! It is nothing more than another step toward one world government IMO. Our country has already lost its identity; we should be working on legislation to recover our culture, our language, and protect our borders!


5 posted on 10/02/2006 4:21:14 AM PDT by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

This is starting to get my attention- need to study to get some facts.


6 posted on 10/02/2006 4:23:00 AM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Hey, doubters and skeptics: Congress is moving against something you said didn't exist.


7 posted on 10/02/2006 4:24:55 AM PDT by RoadTest ( Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution. -2 Tim. 3:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Unfortunately, you cannot pass a law which binds future Congresses, or even the current Congress... Unless it is a Constitutional Amendment, and even that might not work, given the predilection of judges to rewrite the Constitution to suit their fancy.


8 posted on 10/02/2006 4:25:14 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Virgil Goode is a lightweight in terms of clout. This is a calculated sop to the outcry.


9 posted on 10/02/2006 4:26:36 AM PDT by OpusatFR ( ALEA IACTA EST. We have just crossed the Rubicon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom
This is starting to get my attention- need to study to get some facts.

Go to this link North American Union, and scroll down for several articles.

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
10 posted on 10/02/2006 5:02:43 AM PDT by GarySpFc (Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RoadTest

"Hey, doubters and skeptics: Congress is moving against something you said didn't exist"


It was all a well organized game they played to silence any discussion on the subject, I suspect for the same reason all information about this seems to have been kept secret.


11 posted on 10/02/2006 5:04:08 AM PDT by Kimberly GG (Tancredo '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RoadTest
Hey, doubters and skeptics: Congress is moving against something you said didn't exist.

Perfectly stated. My voice is hoarse from arguing with FReepers who constantly pull out the tinfoil hat slam against those of us who have been warning about this for months.

Their next line will be...'WorldNutDaily' reported this story, blah, blah, blah.

12 posted on 10/02/2006 5:18:07 AM PDT by processing please hold
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
I'm glad this is coming to the forefront. No doubt this will shake the psyche of some here on the FR.
13 posted on 10/02/2006 5:32:01 AM PDT by wolfcreek (You can spit in our tacos and you can rape our dogs but, you can't take away our freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
What is least understandable about this is why so many Freepers can be sucked into something that's simply a transparent attempt to force a cut in Interstate Highway funds for Indiana, Tennessee, Arkansas, Kentucky, Illinois, Oklahoma, Kansas, and Texas.

Those guys won't be able to approve zoning for a new gravel driveway if this keeps up.

Rather than "stopping a conspiracy", you all are engaged in a conspiracy.

14 posted on 10/02/2006 5:32:26 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D; Tolerance Sucks Rocks

It's time to stop this in Texas.

15 posted on 10/02/2006 5:52:18 AM PDT by Sarajevo (AAAh! Baghdad-dust, heat, more heat and more dust. I wish I had a beer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

"What is least understandable about this is why so many Freepers can be sucked into something that's simply a transparent attempt to force a cut in Interstate Highway funds for Indiana, Tennessee, Arkansas, Kentucky, Illinois, Oklahoma, Kansas, and Texas."

Which one of us do you think is going to fall for THAT explanation? LMAO


16 posted on 10/02/2006 5:58:26 AM PDT by Kimberly GG (Tancredo '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

"I'm glad this is coming to the forefront. No doubt this will shake the psyche of some here on the FR."

I doubt it. They've made a much too well-organized attempt to silence all discussion on this issue, including being permitted to make personal attacks against anyone involved on the threads. My guess is that with this news, they are re-grouping or looking for direction on what to do next.

Perhaps they will come clean about being in AGREEMENT with what's being proposed instead of denying what's being proposed exists?


17 posted on 10/02/2006 6:09:23 AM PDT by Kimberly GG (Tancredo '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

It's reassuring to know that Dr. Jerome Corsi is on the case. But where is Dr. Paul Craig Roberts?


18 posted on 10/02/2006 6:12:40 AM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG
My guess is that with this news, they are re-grouping or looking for direction on what to do next.

That would be my guess as well.

19 posted on 10/02/2006 6:13:10 AM PDT by processing please hold
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG

The merits of the project aside, my initial objection is the anti-democratic nature of having something that affects the country so much not being the subject of congressional oversight, or even free and open discussion of the plans, goals, and participants in the plan. No matter what the project, we the people should have government in the sunshine, with a chance to see what it is we are paying for, and what will affect our lives.
I don't believe that the private organizations involved are sufficient to keep the faith with anything other than their own interests. I would prefer that the administration not force people to beg for information. All it does is creates suspician when no suspician is warranted, or it creates confidence that the government can do know wrong, when in fact it certainly can.

Where is the opportunity for public imput into what is at least being alleged as one of the most significant policies to affect American commerce in many years?

Private organizations, no matter what they publish for or against, are not a protection of the public. There is no guarantee that what is published by them is true, accurtate and complete, and being private, they have no oversight.

I don't think web sites by private organizations constitues public involvement in the decision making process at all.

I don't trust any government that says,, "Hey, if you nwant to know what's going on, demand a hearing in congress!" Maybe we'll hold a hearing before this all becomes a fait accompli. Yeah, right...government in the sunshine by true men of the people...

After all, we're all to stupid to vote and run the country, right?


20 posted on 10/02/2006 6:17:25 AM PDT by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-357 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson