Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NORM: Wynn accidentally damages Picasso
Reviewjournal.com ^ | Oct. 17, 2006 | Norm Clarke

Posted on 10/17/2006 9:34:51 AM PDT by Abathar

Pablo Picasso's "dream" painting has turned into a $139 million nightmare for Steve Wynn.

In an accident witnessed by a group that included Barbara Walters and screenwriters Nora Ephron and Nicholas Pileggi, Wynn accidentally poked a hole in Picasso's 74-year-old painting, "Le Reve," French for "The Dream."

A day earlier, Wynn had finalized a record $139 million deal for the painting of Picasso's mistress, Wynn told The New Yorker magazine

The accident occurred as a gesturing Wynn, who suffers from retinitis pigmentosa, an eye disease that affects peripheral vision, struck the painting with his right elbow, leaving a hole the size of a silver dollar in the left forearm of Marie-Theresa Walter, Picasso's 21-year-old mistress.

"Oh shit, look what I've done," Wynn said, according to Ephron, who gave her account in a blog published on Monday.

Wynn paid $48.4 million for the Picasso in 1997 and had agreed to sell it to art collector Steven Cohen. The $139 million would have been $4 million higher than the previous high for a work of art, according to The New Yorker.

Cosmetics magnate Ronald Lauder paid $135 million in July for Gustav Klimt's 1907 portrait "Adele Bloch-Bauer I."

Wynn plans to restore "Le Reve" and keep it.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: theDentist

It is indeed. I had the pleasure of seeing it in its former owners home, where it had been for decades. As with so many works, repro's never do it justice.


41 posted on 10/17/2006 10:33:43 AM PDT by whatexit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
Picasso is probably one of the greatest artist in the last century. He could paint in any style...this is an example of his painting when he was about 15 or 16 years of age . Notice the shading and color in the background that adds depth to the portrait... the kid was real real talented. He just got tired of the impressionistic style...looked around and basically found his own style...

Please don't think that he was "made" ..... the guy could flat out paint, sketch draw and create....

he was bred like Tiger Woods to be a great artist, but was also a shrewd businessman and took the styles of many types to develop what is the Picasso type he is famous for. He was an artist...no more no less... As for the kiddie style that is a matter of interpretation... It's a lot harder than it seems. I think..

42 posted on 10/17/2006 10:45:56 AM PDT by Dick Vomer (liberals suck......... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

Holy crap! How on earth did he manage to screw that painting up like that with just an elbow poke?

43 posted on 10/17/2006 11:11:50 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Peace begins in the womb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dick Vomer
Picasso is probably one of the greatest artist in the last century.

Fine. But why did he pick a Mistress with a penis growing out of her chin?

44 posted on 10/17/2006 11:44:52 AM PDT by Michael.SF. (Liberals would let Mark Foley be a Boy Scout leader.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Dick Vomer

Have seen his pencil drawing. As perfect as one could imagine. An excellent draftsman, which is the main prerequisite to being a great artist. Got to be able to execute.


45 posted on 10/17/2006 11:51:12 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

That is so %*#$% funny I am glad I was not drinking something at the time.


46 posted on 10/17/2006 1:40:14 PM PDT by sine_nomine (Vote for the Democrats? - the party of Studds and Frank - the new family values party?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: bunches

I did the same with the famous statue of the ballerina. I just had to touch the dress. The guard was polite. He said if everyone did what I did, there would be no dress left.


47 posted on 10/17/2006 1:41:24 PM PDT by sine_nomine (Vote for the Democrats? - the party of Studds and Frank - the new family values party?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

ROTFL!!!!!Perfection!


48 posted on 10/17/2006 4:28:27 PM PDT by leilani (Dimmi, dimmi se mai fu fatta cosa alcuna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
"But that was a priceless Picasso!"

"Not anymore."

49 posted on 10/17/2006 4:30:27 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

A little duct tape on the back, and it will be as good as new.


50 posted on 10/17/2006 5:36:28 PM PDT by ViLaLuz (Stop the ACLU - Support the Public Expression of Religion Act 2005 - Call your congressmen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

As someone who thinks that paying more than $100 for a work of art is absurd, I find this story hilarious


51 posted on 10/17/2006 9:09:25 PM PDT by Carling (It's Danny, Sir)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #52 Removed by Moderator

To: Dick Vomer
but was also a shrewd businessman and took the styles of many types to develop what is the Picasso type he is famous for.

Picasso was, from what I can tell, reasonably competant when he tried to be. Unfortunately, once he discovered that he could produce dreck and use his 'expertise' to convince people it was prestigious art, he seems to have lost interest in quality forms that require hard work.

You may like the Picasso picture you showed, and I'll agree it's not bad, but I like much batter something like Iman Maleki's A Girl by the Window (available here Maybe I'm just old-fashioned, but to me a good painting shouldn't make one overtly aware that it's a painting, but should instead be more real even than a photograph. Bouguereau achieved this pretty consistently. Some artists achieve it somewhat today. Picasso, for the most part, didn't try.

53 posted on 10/17/2006 9:48:11 PM PDT by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

lol ;o


54 posted on 10/17/2006 10:20:33 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: bunches
My little 3 year old boy, years ago, accidentally sat on a chair at the Toledo Museum of Art that was a replica of a medieval lord's chair or something. It wasn't roped off so he plopped right on it and said "Hi Mommy!".

Lol. I witnessed something similar while on a tour of San Simeon, aka Hearst Castle.

An elderly gentleman sat down on some antique piece of furniture. No harm intended or done. The tour guide wasn't too pleased though.

55 posted on 10/18/2006 5:55:36 AM PDT by csvset (Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil & inhumane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: lakeman
Reminds me of a show I saw on the toob of a guy showing an original clay recording(round tube shaped) the poor fellow had the shakes or something and grabbed to hard and it crushed. He was visibly devastated.

Video of man accidentally crushing one-of-a-kind antique Edison cylinder gramophone recording

56 posted on 10/18/2006 12:10:53 PM PDT by TChris (The United Nations is suffering from delusions of relevance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: csvset

My kid sat on an original chair at Beauvoir, Jefferson Davis' home. The tour guide got quite upset, pulled out this preservation kit, put on gloves and cleaned the chair.


57 posted on 10/19/2006 4:04:38 AM PDT by ViLaLuz (Stop the ACLU - Support the Public Expression of Religion Act 2005 - Call your congressmen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
"But that was a priceless Picasso!"

Not anymore.

"Look, don't try to be funny with me, monsieur. This is a very serious matter... and everyone in this rheum is under the suspicions...

58 posted on 10/27/2006 10:42:28 AM PDT by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson