Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Old_Mil
...It's important that this information is out there. Rudy Guliani is a Clinton liberal and frankly would be no better than the Hildebeest as President.

He'd be a whole lot better than McKook.

52 posted on 11/13/2006 10:24:42 PM PST by freespirited (The MSM is the root of all evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: freespirited
He'd be a whole lot better than McKook.

This is a very serious question. On a whole host of issues, McCain is far more conservative than Guiliani, but I have to agree. McCain's a very dangerous person who would explode under the kind of media barrage that a president is subject to.

I'm not fond of Guiliani, I don't think he'd expend any capital for constitutionalist judges (I think he'd rather find common-sense, wise jurists...like himself) and despite his fondness for the social left, it's not that he'd be a activist leftist, but he wouldn't fight any of the wacky new ideas that they come up with.

That being said, McCrazy is just dangerous.

58 posted on 11/14/2006 5:47:46 AM PST by AmishDude (Libertarians didn't lose it for us. They're losers who work against what they claim to want.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson