Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Congressman Calls For DA Probe In Duke Rape Case
WRAL TV ^ | December 12, 2006

Posted on 12/12/2006 11:20:19 AM PST by Howlin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 last
To: JLS; All

Tables turned for nifong

up next on FOX.


101 posted on 12/13/2006 8:44:20 AM PST by xoxoxox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: xoxoxox

What did they say?


102 posted on 12/13/2006 11:52:20 AM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: JLS

Agree all the way, including Ted and Bernie. I can guarantee you both of them would feel differently if any of the boys showed up at their respective offices seeking representation.

I had always liked Ted, too, but his racist position in this case has caused me to lose a lot of respect for him. It seems like for most or many American blacks, even the middle class, skin color means everything and nothing else counts. So much for Dr. King's dream that every person be judged for his character and not the color of his skin.


103 posted on 12/13/2006 12:20:31 PM PST by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Jezebelle
BREAKING NEWS ON FOX!! Nifong has had the report from the private lab since OCTOBER which found "MULTIPLE men's semen in the accuseer (but not from her boyfriend) and the DNA matches NOBODY ON THE LACROSS TEAM.

Can you put up a separate thread about this? This news needs to be shouted from the roof tops imo.

104 posted on 12/13/2006 12:25:55 PM PST by Carolinamom ("I don't have time to be fingerpointing." ---President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: JLS

Shep reporting that DNA Securities, the private lab that Liefong sent the DNA samples to after SBI did their testing, issued a report indicating that they found multiple DNA semen samples in and on Mangum, and not one of them matched any player and Liefong has had the report since at least October.


105 posted on 12/13/2006 12:30:20 PM PST by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom
BREAKING NEWS on WRAL: According to a defense motion filed Wednesday, a private laboratory hired by the prosecution did not find DNA evidence on an alleged rape victim from any member of the Duke lacrosse team. The woman alleged that she was raped by three members of the team at an off-campus party in March.
106 posted on 12/13/2006 12:32:32 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: JLS

Oh, and it was emphasized that Mangum told authorities that she did not have sex with anyone for a week before the alleged rape.

Two prosecutors on, one defending Liefong, the other stating he needs to be gone and the governor should appoint the AG to investigate.


107 posted on 12/13/2006 12:34:20 PM PST by Jezebelle (Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Jezebelle; All

Lab in lacrosse case found many DNA sources

By Joseph Neff and Benjamin Niolet, Staff Writers, N&O, Modified: Dec 13, 2006 02:54 PM

A private laboratory hired by the prosecution in the Duke lacrosse case failed to report that it found DNA from multiple males in the accuser's body and underwear, according to a defense motion filed today.

The lab, DNA Security of Burlington, found that the DNA did not match the three defendants, their lacrosse teammates or anyone else who submitted their DNA to police, including the accuser's boyfriend.

The new evidence emerged in thousands of documents handed over to the defense in October.

"This is strong evidence of innocence in a case in which the accuser denied engaging in any sexual activity in the days before the alleged assault, told police she last had consensual sexual intercourse a week before the assault, and claimed that her attackers did not use condoms and ejaculated," said the motion, which was signed by lawyers for all three defendants.

"There is not a single mention of this obviously exculpatory evidence in the final DNA Security report."

Three former players -- Dave Evans, 23, of Bethesda, Md.; Collin Finnerty, 20, of Garden City, N.Y.; and Reade Seligmann, 20, of Essex Fells, N.J. -- are charged with rape, kidnapping and sexual offense. The three have said they are innocent.

The accuser, an escort service worker, was one of two women hired to dance at a lacrosse team party in March. The accuser said she was gang-raped by three men in a bathroom over a 30-minute period. She told nurses that she was raped anally, orally and vaginally, that one or more of the men ejaculated, and that her assailants did not wear condoms.

Early on the morning of March 14, a few hours after the party, a doctor and nurse at Duke Hospital examined the woman and collected standard evidence for a rape kit: a pair of panties, hair and swabs of the woman's orifices.

On March 28, the lab at the State Bureau of Investigation tested the rape kit items and found no evidence of semen, blood or saliva, according to SBI records.

On April 4, after meeting with District Attorney Mike Nifong, Durham police investigator Michele Soucie called DNA Security to ask whether the laboratory could do any additional testing of the evidence, according to Soucie's handwritten notes.

Dr. Brian Meehan, director of DNA Security, said his lab could do Y-chromosome testing, which is more sensitive than the tests performed by the SBI lab. The tests isolate cells containing a Y chromosome from the sample, thereby analyzing only DNA contributed by males.

The lab would test the swabs and panty stains for DNA and match any results to the 46 players, the accuser and any other DNA samples collected by police.

Meehan told the investigator that he "can possibly adjust prices because they would really like to be involved in case," Soucie's notes say.

On April 8, 9 and 10, DNA Security found DNA from multiple males on the panties and rectal swab from the rape kit; none matched the lacrosse players.

On April 10, Meehan met in his office with Nifong and the two lead investigators in the case, Sgt. Mark Gottlieb and Investigator Benjamin Himan.

On April 18 and 19, DNA Security ran tests on pubic hair from rape kit; multiple male DNA was found that did not match the players or any other sample taken by police, the motion said.

On April 20 or 21, Meehan again met with Nifong and the two investigators in his Burlington office.

Meehan included none of these DNA results in his final report to Nifong on May 12.

The report violated DNA Security's own policies, which state that reports shall include "results of every DNA test," according to a copy of the policy filed with the motion.

Citing the state's open-file discovery law and the U.S. Supreme Court's requirement for prosecutors to hand over all helpful evidence to the defense, the defense lawyers asked the judge to order Nifong and the lab to provide copies of all laboratory analyses, including those performed after May 12.

Nifong did not immediately return calls for comment. Meehan said he could not comment on the case without first carefully reviewing his files.

http://www.newsobserver.com/1005/story/521017.html


108 posted on 12/13/2006 12:49:06 PM PST by xoxoxox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom; Howlin

Whoa! Well isn't that interesting!

This guy has done horrible things to race relations and is your basic exploitive white Dem. I hope they really and truly nail him. They won't do it unless we keep this going, though.


109 posted on 12/13/2006 12:51:43 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: xoxoxox

D-Day for the DA ! ! !

Thank you DNA.


110 posted on 12/13/2006 12:52:08 PM PST by xoxoxox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: xoxoxox

This is what we have been saying here for a long time. Now that lab and certainly that person is useless in court cases. They have been shown to violate policy and to color results to satisfy clients.

Defense or prosecution attorneys will pound them with this every time they ever go into court? I wonder if they are publically traded and I can run out and short their stock?

Again as we have said here over and over, Nifong is doing great damage to the judical system in NC and beyond. And it has now spilled over to private firms associated with this judicial system. Why the governor or AG can not see this and won't act is beyond me?


111 posted on 12/13/2006 1:52:25 PM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: All

New thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1753040/posts


112 posted on 12/13/2006 1:54:06 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Jezebelle

The sad thing about Ted is that he was so good on this case at first pumping his Durham PD sources to hint that Mangum had all sorts of problems. Then maybe someone got to him or he broke under general political pressure.

The excuse I could come up for him is that maybe to get someone on the Nifong side, they drew straws among the regulars and Ted lost and had to take the Nifong side? I doubt this is the case given the dumb racist things he has said since his good early start.


113 posted on 12/13/2006 1:56:54 PM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: JLS

"Why the governor or AG can not see this
and won't act is beyond me?"

Because they are all Crooks?


114 posted on 12/13/2006 3:38:03 PM PST by xoxoxox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom


I'm sure Walter Jones knows about this. The move on Nifong should go full speed from here, right? (she asks with her fingers crossed).


115 posted on 12/13/2006 3:42:55 PM PST by onyx (Phillip Rivers, LT and the San Diego Chargers! WOO-HOO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson