Posted on 03/19/2007 2:18:25 AM PDT by Man50D
Not to mention more economical. Can you imagine the amount of "AlGore" carbon credits that would be needed to operate that many M1's? /sarc
Michael Savage is a very strong candidate compared to the rest of the pitiful bunch of Republicans we have so far. He is also the only one who would NOT submit his questions in advance for Hillary in any debate.
I can't help thinking that a great many problems around the world would be solved if your President was not - as he is - urbane and restrained, but was in fact a disgruntled ex-dockworker with poor impulse control.
Michael Savage is angry, but so are a whole lot of contemporary Americans. Half of them want to destroy America, the other half want to destroy America's enemies. The two groups are like gas and a match. Our current crop of Republicans don't see this, and their "moderate" leftist trends are worsening the divide because they are increasingly aiding America's enemies and hastening its implosion. Without sane conservatism in our government, insanity will prevail and we could be headed for an internal struggle the likes of which hasn't been seen since Stalin or Hitler. Passions are mounting and we need a leader. Currently, we have none, and none in the making. Voids are often filled, badly.
Mine also, but I think Weiner is mentally deranged.
There currently is no real penalty for making the attempt to cross. If you get caught and sent back, you just try again. We will continue to get illegal immigration as long as the rewards (working in US for better wages than Mexico) exceed the penalties
"I've listened to his show off and on since his days as a fill-in at KGO, and I have to agree with that. I also could not bring myself to vote for a guy who lacks control over his emotions to the degree that I'd worry about him trying to launch strategic weapons out of a fit of personal rage."
I believe you've just described Hillary!
Lot's of people say that without providing proof, other than he "sounds" crazy at times.
I've heard enough of him to know.
I certainly have my disagreements with Bush, but if we're going to nominate a San Francisco talk-show host- my pick would be Lee Rogers. He's deadly right-on, without the screaming antics. I have never heard a moonbat caller call his show that didn't get shot down in flames.
Oh, joy. Another Ross Perot.
Yes, his ego is quite large, but I think he would mainly be trying to influence the type of ideas that would emerge as the electioneering goes into full force.
That's fine, you're entitled to your opinion. But don't expect everyone else to agree with you.
Your name isn't Amelia Erhardt by any chance is it?
;o)
placemark
Peace.
BTW, I don't think he'll be leaving the airwaves any time soon.
The pay's too good.
It's like I tell my wife. I'm always right ;-).
Sounding crazy every day he is on the air, is substantial proof that he is indeed, crazy. If he could make it three hours in one setting without sounding crazy, then, I might give him the benefit of the doubt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.