Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FR Spellcheck Contractions
Me | 4/5/07 | Me

Posted on 04/05/2007 7:51:03 PM PDT by conservative in nyc

Has anyone noticed that the Free Republic spellcheck function isn't recognizing some contractions as spelled correctly?


TOPICS: Focus Software
KEYWORDS: contractions; spellcheck
I don't understand this - "don't" and "I'm" are shown as spelled correctly, but many other contractions aren't. That shouldn't be. But I'm sure some FReepers couldn't care less,since they don't use spellcheck. Ain't that a shame?
1 posted on 04/05/2007 7:51:04 PM PDT by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

I’s two ignern’t ta notice.


2 posted on 04/05/2007 7:52:22 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Peace without victory is a temporary illusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

Good thing I don’t make mistakes.


3 posted on 04/05/2007 8:01:27 PM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc
Is this the correct spelling for these three below?

didn’t
hadn’t
isn’t

4 posted on 04/05/2007 8:13:19 PM PDT by Esther Ruth (Psalm 137:5 If I forget thee, O Jerusalem......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth; John Robinson

All three of those show up as spelled incorrectly when I spell check them, for some reason. “I’m”, “don’t” and “can’t” work, probably because “I”, “don” and “can” are actual words.

I don’t remember this being an issue until the past month or so.


5 posted on 04/05/2007 8:15:49 PM PDT by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc
spellcheck dose not like spellcheck
6 posted on 04/05/2007 8:21:33 PM PDT by ThomasThomas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThomasThomas
spellcheck dose not like spellcheck

Probably because spell check is two words, not one. I misspelled spell check because spell check isn't available for original posts.

I really need the spell check function.
7 posted on 04/05/2007 8:25:13 PM PDT by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc
Someone somewhere perhaps did a study and found out a good portion of folks can’t remember where to put that do-dad thingy and so they are at this very moment, as we speak, attempting to make contractions obsolete worldwide. It’s for the children. They’ll have more time to learn more important global citizenship stuff.
8 posted on 04/05/2007 8:27:17 PM PDT by Esther Ruth (Psalm 137:5 If I forget thee, O Jerusalem......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

Halp us, Jon Karry, fix thee spell checkr.


9 posted on 04/05/2007 8:28:41 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Prevent Glo-Ball Warming ... turn out the sun when not in use)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth
Seen the following at FR lately?...

they're / their /there

whose / who's

you're / your

10 posted on 04/05/2007 8:30:17 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you've had life support. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth

Well, if it is for the children, I will not use contractions. It is a good thing that the Free Republic spell checker is not recognizing contractions as words if it is for the children. After all, it is for the children.


11 posted on 04/05/2007 8:35:16 PM PDT by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc
Like bain’t, tha’r and fo'sachee? Yeah, I get that too.
12 posted on 04/05/2007 8:58:38 PM PDT by LongElegantLegs (Wake me up when everyone is ready to self-identify as "earthling.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Happens all the time when fingers are flying across the keyboard.

Contractions and homonyms are the buggars in the English language.

Spell check off.


13 posted on 04/06/2007 2:01:52 AM PDT by Goldie Lurks (professional moonbat catcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Right, we need Grammar check on here!


14 posted on 04/06/2007 4:48:20 AM PDT by Shimmer128 (I am extraordinarily patient as long as I get my way in the end.-Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Shimmer128

Grammar check is off when the pajama patrol is on duty.


15 posted on 04/06/2007 10:06:56 AM PDT by Goldie Lurks (professional moonbat catcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

Ah, the recent change to add typographer’s marks has come back to haunt me. The spell check doesn’t like the curly quotes. Hm. I’ll see what can be done about that.


16 posted on 04/06/2007 12:54:55 PM PDT by John Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: John Robinson

Ouch, double-encoded UTF-8. I hate Unicode. :-(


17 posted on 04/06/2007 12:55:23 PM PDT by John Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

I noticed it yesterday, then today it told me that Freeper wasn’t a word. I just ignored it.


18 posted on 04/06/2007 1:03:36 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Robinson

Thanks for your work here.


19 posted on 04/06/2007 1:44:09 PM PDT by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson