Skip to comments.
Airbus' A380 is a huge jet, but lacks 747's glamour
Seattle Post-Intelligencer ^
| Last updated April 6, 2007 3:35 p.m. PT
| CHRISTINE NEGRONI
Posted on 04/08/2007 9:40:26 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: GeorgiaDawg32
Except for the B-1B.
21
posted on
04/08/2007 11:11:20 AM PDT
by
onedoug
To: Pukin Dog
Puking Dog
Do you have any numbers on seat mile fuel burn of the A380 as compared to Boeings 787 Dreamliner?
22
posted on
04/08/2007 11:15:10 AM PDT
by
cpdiii
(Pharmacist, Pilot, Geologist, Oil Field Trash and proud of it.)
To: daviddennis; gotribe; KarlInOhio
Karl, I think these airlines are trying to figure out ways to fill these planes, and they are obviously worried that they won’t be able to, thus the tactic of not pushing the plane to its highest capacity. I think they’d rather have passengers more comfortable than fly with empty seats, particularly since comfort might be a competitive advantage. But the passengers that matter most to airlines are flying business or first class anyway. Those seats are just as comfortable on an A330, A340, 787, 777, or 747. Given equal comfort levels, scheduling is more important than the size of the aircraft. Two 787's can carry the same number of passengers as one A380 while carrying over three times the revenue cargo and having more flexibility in scheduling.
To: GeorgiaDawg32
And will continue to for decades to come with the next generation 747-8 which already has orders for both the passenger and freighter versions. Truely the queen of the skies.
24
posted on
04/08/2007 11:21:07 AM PDT
by
Proud_USA_Republican
(We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
To: Paleo Conservative
25
posted on
04/08/2007 11:21:20 AM PDT
by
phantomworker
(COURAGE is not the lack of fear, but knowing there is something more important .)
To: cpdiii; Pukin Dog
Do you have any numbers on seat mile fuel burn of the A380 as compared to Boeings 787 Dreamliner?
Supposedly two 787-10's (the 787-10 hasn't been launched yet) would have slightly more passengers while having lower CASM and more cargo. One 787-10 would have about 1.8 times more revenue cargo than an A380. Having two decks full of passengers with baggage eats into the space available for cargo.
To: phantomworker; Pukin Dog; KarlInOhio; BurbankKarl
Or here! LAX Landing
The pilot sure used a lot of rudder on that landing. I see what you mean about yaw on landing.
To: cpdiii
Its 'Pukin' It aint poor English like this sentence.
The Dreamliner blows everything away in terms of seat-mile costs. The A-380 gets its efficiency from stuffing it with people like a cattle car. It really isn't very efficient at all.
28
posted on
04/08/2007 11:35:08 AM PDT
by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: Pukin Dog
How about this plane ?
Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird.
29
posted on
04/08/2007 11:56:36 AM PDT
by
Prophet in the wilderness
(PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
To: phantomworker
WOW... I can only imagine what it looked like from the cockpit.
30
posted on
04/08/2007 11:58:41 AM PDT
by
Little_shoe
("For Sailor MEN in Battle fair since fighting days of old have earned the right.to the blue and gold)
To: Rockpile; Pukin Dog
Can the landing gear be adjusted help compensate for landing in strong crosswinds?
I think the B-52's can turn up to 15 degrees off center.
To: Little_shoe
That’s why they provide barf bags for the pilots.
32
posted on
04/08/2007 12:33:24 PM PDT
by
Prophet in the wilderness
(PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
To: Paleo Conservative
I think it is inherent and deeply embedded in Boeing to design towards the cruise and Boeing knows how to the most out of that regime of flight.
IMO it shows in the airplanes such as the 747-400, 777, and even more so for the 787 and the SuperSonic Cruiser (if they ever build it)
33
posted on
04/08/2007 12:51:14 PM PDT
by
RunningWolf
(2-1 Cav 1975)
To: RunningWolf
I cant wait for the dreamliner to arrive in MIA. What a beautiful plane! Try to get the screensaver from Boeing.com of the dreamliner. Beautiful! I will never, ever set foot on a A380. They might as well just name them Flying Titanics.
34
posted on
04/08/2007 1:00:30 PM PDT
by
FreeManWhoCan
(I hate it when spellcheck tells me to capitalize islam and allah.)
To: KarlInOhio
I heard this one story and I don't know if it was an urban legend or not, but a pilot had made a really hard landing and during departation of the plane no one said a word to him about it until and 80’sh year old woman asked if they were they shot down on the way in :-)
I was on a really hard one back in 1988 or and I wont blame it on the pilot it was just one of those things. We were coming into Denver and in that last 50’ or so a huge gust of wind picked the airplane up and then the bottom dropped out. I was like %^$## here it comes! I was seated over the center wing box area and as hard as we hit (KWHAM!!) I knew there was bound to be a few fuel leaks to come out of that later, and maybe some broken fasteners to be found during HMV open up.
35
posted on
04/08/2007 1:11:01 PM PDT
by
RunningWolf
(2-1 Cav 1975)
To: KarlInOhio
Oh I forgot, that was a 727-200 (stretch) airplane we were on.
36
posted on
04/08/2007 1:13:31 PM PDT
by
RunningWolf
(2-1 Cav 1975)
To: RunningWolf; KarlInOhio
My favorite plane of all time. It especially looked good in Braniff’s liveries.
To: Paleo Conservative
Yes it did.
I wish they had made it. One of their very top people taught one of my airline mgt courses and I learned more from him and that one course than some multiple (3, 4, 5?) of what other courses were brought to me.
Not for him, but for another course I did a study paper on the topic of age 60 mandatory retirement for Pilots.
I know you career pilot guys wont like my answer, but my conclusion was that while there are exceptions, overall it is correct policy esp when the exponentially raising probability of stroke/heart attack occurring becomes a factor.
38
posted on
04/08/2007 1:32:32 PM PDT
by
RunningWolf
(2-1 Cav 1975)
To: Prophet in the wilderness
I knew I used to carry a ziplock bag in the top part of my Gsuit when I was doing flight school. The only thing that could shake up my stomach like nothing out was spinning the airplane.
39
posted on
04/08/2007 1:41:21 PM PDT
by
Little_shoe
("For Sailor MEN in Battle fair since fighting days of old have earned the right.to the blue and gold)
To: Calvin Locke
Can the landing gear be adjusted help compensate for landing in strong crosswinds? I think the B-52's can turn up to 15 degrees off center. I believe the 747 gear also compensates.
40
posted on
04/08/2007 1:47:42 PM PDT
by
MistrX
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson